Multidimensionaliteit en die multikulturele situasie

Multidimensionality and the multicultural situation Most societies and social institutions are currently characterised by the presence of a multitude of cultures which is an indication of a multicultural situation. Two opposite reductionist proposals for dealing with this situation are those of ho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: M. Heyns
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: Scriber Editorial Systems 2006-07-01
Series:Koers : Bulletin for Christian Scholarship
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.koersjournal.org.za/index.php/koers/article/view/242
id doaj-35fc1c38b4cd4ee7bf19b5d65492dfa0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-35fc1c38b4cd4ee7bf19b5d65492dfa02020-11-25T02:09:30ZafrScriber Editorial SystemsKoers : Bulletin for Christian Scholarship0023-270X2304-85572006-07-01712-410.4102/koers.v71i2-4.242Multidimensionaliteit en die multikulturele situasieM. Heyns0Skool vir Filosofie, Potchefstroomkampus, Noordwes-UniversiteitMultidimensionality and the multicultural situation Most societies and social institutions are currently characterised by the presence of a multitude of cultures which is an indication of a multicultural situation. Two opposite reductionist proposals for dealing with this situation are those of homogenisers/ universalists and fragmentists/particularists. There is also a dualistic in-between group. The question of this article has two sides: diagnostically it asks about the nature of the reductionism of the three groups. Therapeutically the question is about the conditions for overcoming this reductionism. Diagnostically it is argued that the reductionists deal in a one-sided way with two sets of abstractions of the multicultural situation. More precisely: they do not succeed in holding simultaneously onto important dimensions like coherence and diversity, as well as universality and particularity. Therapeutically it is argued that the latter dimensions of the multicultural situation must be mutually engaged in order for them to empower one another. It is proposed that this can be accomplished by a clear distinction between universal types like culture, justice, morality and so on, and also between these types and their particular manifestations. Furthermore, reductionisms as well as the disengagements of dualism can be avoided if the relationprinciples of parataxis, complementarity and acculturation are adhered to.https://www.koersjournal.org.za/index.php/koers/article/view/242CoherenceDiversityMulticulturalityParticularityUniversality
collection DOAJ
language Afrikaans
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M. Heyns
spellingShingle M. Heyns
Multidimensionaliteit en die multikulturele situasie
Koers : Bulletin for Christian Scholarship
Coherence
Diversity
Multiculturality
Particularity
Universality
author_facet M. Heyns
author_sort M. Heyns
title Multidimensionaliteit en die multikulturele situasie
title_short Multidimensionaliteit en die multikulturele situasie
title_full Multidimensionaliteit en die multikulturele situasie
title_fullStr Multidimensionaliteit en die multikulturele situasie
title_full_unstemmed Multidimensionaliteit en die multikulturele situasie
title_sort multidimensionaliteit en die multikulturele situasie
publisher Scriber Editorial Systems
series Koers : Bulletin for Christian Scholarship
issn 0023-270X
2304-8557
publishDate 2006-07-01
description Multidimensionality and the multicultural situation Most societies and social institutions are currently characterised by the presence of a multitude of cultures which is an indication of a multicultural situation. Two opposite reductionist proposals for dealing with this situation are those of homogenisers/ universalists and fragmentists/particularists. There is also a dualistic in-between group. The question of this article has two sides: diagnostically it asks about the nature of the reductionism of the three groups. Therapeutically the question is about the conditions for overcoming this reductionism. Diagnostically it is argued that the reductionists deal in a one-sided way with two sets of abstractions of the multicultural situation. More precisely: they do not succeed in holding simultaneously onto important dimensions like coherence and diversity, as well as universality and particularity. Therapeutically it is argued that the latter dimensions of the multicultural situation must be mutually engaged in order for them to empower one another. It is proposed that this can be accomplished by a clear distinction between universal types like culture, justice, morality and so on, and also between these types and their particular manifestations. Furthermore, reductionisms as well as the disengagements of dualism can be avoided if the relationprinciples of parataxis, complementarity and acculturation are adhered to.
topic Coherence
Diversity
Multiculturality
Particularity
Universality
url https://www.koersjournal.org.za/index.php/koers/article/view/242
work_keys_str_mv AT mheyns multidimensionaliteitendiemultikulturelesituasie
_version_ 1724923384150622208