Emission ratios of trace gases and particles for Siberian forest fires on the basis of mobile ground observations

• Main Authors: A. Vasileva, K. Moiseenko, A. Skorokhod, I. Belikov, V. Kopeikin, O. Lavrova
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Copernicus Publications 2017-10-01
• Series: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
• Online Access: https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/17/12303/2017/acp-17-12303-2017.pdf
• ISSN: 1680-7316; 1680-7324

Boreal forest fires are currently recognized as a significant factor in climate change and air quality problems. Although emissions of biomass burning products are widely measured in many regions, there is still lack of information on the composition of wildfire emissions in Siberia, a region known for its severe wildfire activity. Emission ratios (ERs) are important characteristics of wildfire emissions as they may be used to calculate the mass of species emitted into the atmosphere due to combustion of a known mass of biomass fuel. We analyze observations of carbon dioxide (CO₂), carbon monoxide (CO), methane (CH₄), total nonmethane hydrocarbons (NMHCs), nitrogen oxides NO_<i>x</i> ( =  NO + NO₂), particulate matter (PM₃), and black carbon (BC) within two forest fire plume transects made by the moving railway observatory during TRanscontinental Observations Into the Chemistry of the Atmosphere (TROICA) expeditions. Slopes in linear regressions of excess levels of the pollutants are used to obtain ER_{CO ∕ CO₂} = 10–15 %, ER_{CH₄ ∕ CO} = 8–10 %, ER_{NMHC ∕ CO} = 0.11–0.21 % ppmC ppmC⁻¹, ER_{NO_<i>x</i> ∕ CO} = 1.5–3.0  ppb ppm⁻¹, ER_{PM₃ ∕ CO} = 320–385 ng m⁻³ (µg m⁻³)⁻¹, and ER_{BC ∕ CO} =  6.1–6.3 µg m⁻³ ppm⁻¹, which fall within the range of uncertainty of the previous estimates, being at the higher edge for ER_{CH₄ ∕ CO}, ER_{NMHC ∕ CO}, and ER_{PM₃ ∕ CO} and at the lower edge for ER_{NO_<i>x</i> ∕ CO}. The relative uncertainties comprise 5–15 % of the estimated ER_{CH₄ ∕ CO}, ER_{NMHC ∕ CO}, and ER_{PM ∕ CO} and 10–20 % of ER_{NO_<i>x</i> ∕ CO}, ER_{CO ∕ CO₂}, and ER_{BC ∕ CO}. The uncertainties are lower than in many other similar studies and associated mainly with natural variability of wildfire emissions.