Mental health assessments in refugees and asylum seekers: evaluation of a tablet-assisted screening software

Abstract Background Mental health problems resulting from persecution and forced migration are very common among refugees and asylum seekers and evolve into a major public health challenge in hosting societies. Language barriers often prevent timely access to appropriate health care, leading to chro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Naser Morina, Simon M. Ewers, Sandra Passardi, Ulrich Schnyder, Christine Knaevelsrud, Julia Müller, Richard A. Bryant, Angela Nickerson, Matthis Schick
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-10-01
Series:Conflict and Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13031-017-0120-2
id doaj-35ee69644ff94286be292df98f661d77
record_format Article
spelling doaj-35ee69644ff94286be292df98f661d772020-11-24T20:57:13ZengBMCConflict and Health1752-15052017-10-011111910.1186/s13031-017-0120-2Mental health assessments in refugees and asylum seekers: evaluation of a tablet-assisted screening softwareNaser Morina0Simon M. Ewers1Sandra Passardi2Ulrich Schnyder3Christine Knaevelsrud4Julia Müller5Richard A. Bryant6Angela Nickerson7Matthis Schick8Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Zurich, University of ZurichDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Zurich, University of ZurichDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Zurich, University of ZurichDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Zurich, University of ZurichDepartment of Clinical Psychological Intervention, Freie UniversitätPsychiatric Services ThurgauSchool of Psychology, University of New South WalesSchool of Psychology, University of New South WalesDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Zurich, University of ZurichAbstract Background Mental health problems resulting from persecution and forced migration are very common among refugees and asylum seekers and evolve into a major public health challenge in hosting societies. Language barriers often prevent timely access to appropriate health care, leading to chronic trajectories and abortive social integration. Tools for multilingual screening and assessment could be of great benefit for this particularly vulnerable population as well as for policy makers. This study aimed at testing the reliability, feasibility and usability of the Multi-Adaptive Psychological Screening Software (MAPSS), a newly developed Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interview Software (ACASI) for touchscreen devices, for screening purposes in a clinical setting. Methods In a randomized cross-over design including both MAPSS and paper-pencil clinician-administered interviews, 30 treatment-seeking refugees completed clinical measures and a feasibility questionnaire to rate the user interface of MAPSS. Five professionals performed given tasks in MAPSS and completed usability questionnaires for the administration interface. Results Results showed no differences between the two assessment modalities with regard to symptom scores. The findings suggest good feasibility and usability of MAPSS in traumatized refugees. The administration via MAPSS was significantly shorter than the paper-pencil interview. Conclusion MAPSS may be a cost-effective, flexible and valid alternative to interpreter-based psychometric screening and assessment.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13031-017-0120-2RefugeesACASIInterviewScreeningClinical settingUsability
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Naser Morina
Simon M. Ewers
Sandra Passardi
Ulrich Schnyder
Christine Knaevelsrud
Julia Müller
Richard A. Bryant
Angela Nickerson
Matthis Schick
spellingShingle Naser Morina
Simon M. Ewers
Sandra Passardi
Ulrich Schnyder
Christine Knaevelsrud
Julia Müller
Richard A. Bryant
Angela Nickerson
Matthis Schick
Mental health assessments in refugees and asylum seekers: evaluation of a tablet-assisted screening software
Conflict and Health
Refugees
ACASI
Interview
Screening
Clinical setting
Usability
author_facet Naser Morina
Simon M. Ewers
Sandra Passardi
Ulrich Schnyder
Christine Knaevelsrud
Julia Müller
Richard A. Bryant
Angela Nickerson
Matthis Schick
author_sort Naser Morina
title Mental health assessments in refugees and asylum seekers: evaluation of a tablet-assisted screening software
title_short Mental health assessments in refugees and asylum seekers: evaluation of a tablet-assisted screening software
title_full Mental health assessments in refugees and asylum seekers: evaluation of a tablet-assisted screening software
title_fullStr Mental health assessments in refugees and asylum seekers: evaluation of a tablet-assisted screening software
title_full_unstemmed Mental health assessments in refugees and asylum seekers: evaluation of a tablet-assisted screening software
title_sort mental health assessments in refugees and asylum seekers: evaluation of a tablet-assisted screening software
publisher BMC
series Conflict and Health
issn 1752-1505
publishDate 2017-10-01
description Abstract Background Mental health problems resulting from persecution and forced migration are very common among refugees and asylum seekers and evolve into a major public health challenge in hosting societies. Language barriers often prevent timely access to appropriate health care, leading to chronic trajectories and abortive social integration. Tools for multilingual screening and assessment could be of great benefit for this particularly vulnerable population as well as for policy makers. This study aimed at testing the reliability, feasibility and usability of the Multi-Adaptive Psychological Screening Software (MAPSS), a newly developed Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interview Software (ACASI) for touchscreen devices, for screening purposes in a clinical setting. Methods In a randomized cross-over design including both MAPSS and paper-pencil clinician-administered interviews, 30 treatment-seeking refugees completed clinical measures and a feasibility questionnaire to rate the user interface of MAPSS. Five professionals performed given tasks in MAPSS and completed usability questionnaires for the administration interface. Results Results showed no differences between the two assessment modalities with regard to symptom scores. The findings suggest good feasibility and usability of MAPSS in traumatized refugees. The administration via MAPSS was significantly shorter than the paper-pencil interview. Conclusion MAPSS may be a cost-effective, flexible and valid alternative to interpreter-based psychometric screening and assessment.
topic Refugees
ACASI
Interview
Screening
Clinical setting
Usability
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13031-017-0120-2
work_keys_str_mv AT nasermorina mentalhealthassessmentsinrefugeesandasylumseekersevaluationofatabletassistedscreeningsoftware
AT simonmewers mentalhealthassessmentsinrefugeesandasylumseekersevaluationofatabletassistedscreeningsoftware
AT sandrapassardi mentalhealthassessmentsinrefugeesandasylumseekersevaluationofatabletassistedscreeningsoftware
AT ulrichschnyder mentalhealthassessmentsinrefugeesandasylumseekersevaluationofatabletassistedscreeningsoftware
AT christineknaevelsrud mentalhealthassessmentsinrefugeesandasylumseekersevaluationofatabletassistedscreeningsoftware
AT juliamuller mentalhealthassessmentsinrefugeesandasylumseekersevaluationofatabletassistedscreeningsoftware
AT richardabryant mentalhealthassessmentsinrefugeesandasylumseekersevaluationofatabletassistedscreeningsoftware
AT angelanickerson mentalhealthassessmentsinrefugeesandasylumseekersevaluationofatabletassistedscreeningsoftware
AT matthisschick mentalhealthassessmentsinrefugeesandasylumseekersevaluationofatabletassistedscreeningsoftware
_version_ 1716788479032033280