Dynamic Network Connectedness of Bitcoin Markets: Evidence from Realized Volatility

In this paper, we explore the volatility spillovers across different Bitcoin markets. We decompose the realized volatility into common and idiosyncratic volatilities, as well as the good and bad volatilities. Then the asymmetry in volatility spillovers between Bitcoin markets is measured by the DY (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shuanglian Chen, Hao Dong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Physics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphy.2020.582817/full
id doaj-35e3fe2136744de6a24a1beeac8dd4ab
record_format Article
spelling doaj-35e3fe2136744de6a24a1beeac8dd4ab2020-12-08T08:42:44ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physics2296-424X2020-11-01810.3389/fphy.2020.582817582817Dynamic Network Connectedness of Bitcoin Markets: Evidence from Realized VolatilityShuanglian Chen0Hao Dong1Guangzhou International Institute of Finance and Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, ChinaSchool of Economics and Statistics, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, ChinaIn this paper, we explore the volatility spillovers across different Bitcoin markets. We decompose the realized volatility into common and idiosyncratic volatilities, as well as the good and bad volatilities. Then the asymmetry in volatility spillovers between Bitcoin markets is measured by the DY (Diebold and Yilmaz) index. In addition, we construct statistics to test the asymmetry in volatility spillovers between different Bitcoin markets. The results are achieved as follows. The spillovers of systematic and idiosyncratic volatilities dominate the connectedness among different Bitcoin markets. In addition, the idiosyncratic volatility spillovers are more easily influenced by policies. Good volatility spillovers dominate the Bitcoin markets and change over time. The further results suggest that there is significant asymmetry between systematic and idiosyncratic volatility spillovers in the Bitcoin markets, while the asymmetries between good and bad volatility spillovers are heterogeneous in different markets. The findings in this paper can provide some suggestions for regulators controlling market stability and investors generating investment strategies.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphy.2020.582817/fullasymmetricconnectednessbitcoinrealized volatilitygood and bad volatilitycommon and idiosyncratic volatility
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shuanglian Chen
Hao Dong
spellingShingle Shuanglian Chen
Hao Dong
Dynamic Network Connectedness of Bitcoin Markets: Evidence from Realized Volatility
Frontiers in Physics
asymmetric
connectedness
bitcoin
realized volatility
good and bad volatility
common and idiosyncratic volatility
author_facet Shuanglian Chen
Hao Dong
author_sort Shuanglian Chen
title Dynamic Network Connectedness of Bitcoin Markets: Evidence from Realized Volatility
title_short Dynamic Network Connectedness of Bitcoin Markets: Evidence from Realized Volatility
title_full Dynamic Network Connectedness of Bitcoin Markets: Evidence from Realized Volatility
title_fullStr Dynamic Network Connectedness of Bitcoin Markets: Evidence from Realized Volatility
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic Network Connectedness of Bitcoin Markets: Evidence from Realized Volatility
title_sort dynamic network connectedness of bitcoin markets: evidence from realized volatility
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Physics
issn 2296-424X
publishDate 2020-11-01
description In this paper, we explore the volatility spillovers across different Bitcoin markets. We decompose the realized volatility into common and idiosyncratic volatilities, as well as the good and bad volatilities. Then the asymmetry in volatility spillovers between Bitcoin markets is measured by the DY (Diebold and Yilmaz) index. In addition, we construct statistics to test the asymmetry in volatility spillovers between different Bitcoin markets. The results are achieved as follows. The spillovers of systematic and idiosyncratic volatilities dominate the connectedness among different Bitcoin markets. In addition, the idiosyncratic volatility spillovers are more easily influenced by policies. Good volatility spillovers dominate the Bitcoin markets and change over time. The further results suggest that there is significant asymmetry between systematic and idiosyncratic volatility spillovers in the Bitcoin markets, while the asymmetries between good and bad volatility spillovers are heterogeneous in different markets. The findings in this paper can provide some suggestions for regulators controlling market stability and investors generating investment strategies.
topic asymmetric
connectedness
bitcoin
realized volatility
good and bad volatility
common and idiosyncratic volatility
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphy.2020.582817/full
work_keys_str_mv AT shuanglianchen dynamicnetworkconnectednessofbitcoinmarketsevidencefromrealizedvolatility
AT haodong dynamicnetworkconnectednessofbitcoinmarketsevidencefromrealizedvolatility
_version_ 1724390266763214848