Dynamic Network Connectedness of Bitcoin Markets: Evidence from Realized Volatility
In this paper, we explore the volatility spillovers across different Bitcoin markets. We decompose the realized volatility into common and idiosyncratic volatilities, as well as the good and bad volatilities. Then the asymmetry in volatility spillovers between Bitcoin markets is measured by the DY (...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-11-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Physics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphy.2020.582817/full |
id |
doaj-35e3fe2136744de6a24a1beeac8dd4ab |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-35e3fe2136744de6a24a1beeac8dd4ab2020-12-08T08:42:44ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physics2296-424X2020-11-01810.3389/fphy.2020.582817582817Dynamic Network Connectedness of Bitcoin Markets: Evidence from Realized VolatilityShuanglian Chen0Hao Dong1Guangzhou International Institute of Finance and Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, ChinaSchool of Economics and Statistics, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, ChinaIn this paper, we explore the volatility spillovers across different Bitcoin markets. We decompose the realized volatility into common and idiosyncratic volatilities, as well as the good and bad volatilities. Then the asymmetry in volatility spillovers between Bitcoin markets is measured by the DY (Diebold and Yilmaz) index. In addition, we construct statistics to test the asymmetry in volatility spillovers between different Bitcoin markets. The results are achieved as follows. The spillovers of systematic and idiosyncratic volatilities dominate the connectedness among different Bitcoin markets. In addition, the idiosyncratic volatility spillovers are more easily influenced by policies. Good volatility spillovers dominate the Bitcoin markets and change over time. The further results suggest that there is significant asymmetry between systematic and idiosyncratic volatility spillovers in the Bitcoin markets, while the asymmetries between good and bad volatility spillovers are heterogeneous in different markets. The findings in this paper can provide some suggestions for regulators controlling market stability and investors generating investment strategies.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphy.2020.582817/fullasymmetricconnectednessbitcoinrealized volatilitygood and bad volatilitycommon and idiosyncratic volatility |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Shuanglian Chen Hao Dong |
spellingShingle |
Shuanglian Chen Hao Dong Dynamic Network Connectedness of Bitcoin Markets: Evidence from Realized Volatility Frontiers in Physics asymmetric connectedness bitcoin realized volatility good and bad volatility common and idiosyncratic volatility |
author_facet |
Shuanglian Chen Hao Dong |
author_sort |
Shuanglian Chen |
title |
Dynamic Network Connectedness of Bitcoin Markets: Evidence from Realized Volatility |
title_short |
Dynamic Network Connectedness of Bitcoin Markets: Evidence from Realized Volatility |
title_full |
Dynamic Network Connectedness of Bitcoin Markets: Evidence from Realized Volatility |
title_fullStr |
Dynamic Network Connectedness of Bitcoin Markets: Evidence from Realized Volatility |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dynamic Network Connectedness of Bitcoin Markets: Evidence from Realized Volatility |
title_sort |
dynamic network connectedness of bitcoin markets: evidence from realized volatility |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Physics |
issn |
2296-424X |
publishDate |
2020-11-01 |
description |
In this paper, we explore the volatility spillovers across different Bitcoin markets. We decompose the realized volatility into common and idiosyncratic volatilities, as well as the good and bad volatilities. Then the asymmetry in volatility spillovers between Bitcoin markets is measured by the DY (Diebold and Yilmaz) index. In addition, we construct statistics to test the asymmetry in volatility spillovers between different Bitcoin markets. The results are achieved as follows. The spillovers of systematic and idiosyncratic volatilities dominate the connectedness among different Bitcoin markets. In addition, the idiosyncratic volatility spillovers are more easily influenced by policies. Good volatility spillovers dominate the Bitcoin markets and change over time. The further results suggest that there is significant asymmetry between systematic and idiosyncratic volatility spillovers in the Bitcoin markets, while the asymmetries between good and bad volatility spillovers are heterogeneous in different markets. The findings in this paper can provide some suggestions for regulators controlling market stability and investors generating investment strategies. |
topic |
asymmetric connectedness bitcoin realized volatility good and bad volatility common and idiosyncratic volatility |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphy.2020.582817/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shuanglianchen dynamicnetworkconnectednessofbitcoinmarketsevidencefromrealizedvolatility AT haodong dynamicnetworkconnectednessofbitcoinmarketsevidencefromrealizedvolatility |
_version_ |
1724390266763214848 |