Is corneal sensitivity sex dependent?
Purpose: To determine whether corneal sensitivity is different between the two genders. Methods: Corneal sensitivity of 130 normal volunteers, including 77 women and 53 men aged 20-35 years, with no history of previous ocular surgery was measured using the Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer. Measurements w...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Knowledge E
2015-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jovr.org/article.asp?issn=2008-322X;year=2015;volume=10;issue=2;spage=102;epage=105;aulast=Khezri |
id |
doaj-35dc550df61b4b5ebc77eda683bea513 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-35dc550df61b4b5ebc77eda683bea5132020-11-24T22:06:22ZengKnowledge EJournal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research2008-322X2015-01-0110210210510.4103/2008-322X.163772Is corneal sensitivity sex dependent?Fatemeh KhezriAli MirzajaniFarid KarimianEbrahim JafarzadehpurPurpose: To determine whether corneal sensitivity is different between the two genders. Methods: Corneal sensitivity of 130 normal volunteers, including 77 women and 53 men aged 20-35 years, with no history of previous ocular surgery was measured using the Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer. Measurements were done on five corneal regions: central, nasal, inferior, temporal and superior. The findings were compared between men and women using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Mean age of male subjects was 28.0 years and that of female participants was 26.8 years (P = 0.063). There was a significant difference in corneal sensitivity between men and women in the superior (P = 0.013), temporal (P = 0.020) and inferior (P = 0.046) regions. There was no significant difference in corneal sensitivity in the central (P = 0.862) and nasal (P = 0.273) regions. Conclusion: Except for the central and nasal regions, corneal sensitivity is significantly higher in men as compared to women. The reason for this difference is not yet evident.http://www.jovr.org/article.asp?issn=2008-322X;year=2015;volume=10;issue=2;spage=102;epage=105;aulast=KhezriCorneal Sensitivity; Esthesiometery; Sex |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Fatemeh Khezri Ali Mirzajani Farid Karimian Ebrahim Jafarzadehpur |
spellingShingle |
Fatemeh Khezri Ali Mirzajani Farid Karimian Ebrahim Jafarzadehpur Is corneal sensitivity sex dependent? Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research Corneal Sensitivity; Esthesiometery; Sex |
author_facet |
Fatemeh Khezri Ali Mirzajani Farid Karimian Ebrahim Jafarzadehpur |
author_sort |
Fatemeh Khezri |
title |
Is corneal sensitivity sex dependent? |
title_short |
Is corneal sensitivity sex dependent? |
title_full |
Is corneal sensitivity sex dependent? |
title_fullStr |
Is corneal sensitivity sex dependent? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is corneal sensitivity sex dependent? |
title_sort |
is corneal sensitivity sex dependent? |
publisher |
Knowledge E |
series |
Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research |
issn |
2008-322X |
publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
description |
Purpose: To determine whether corneal sensitivity is different between the two genders.
Methods: Corneal sensitivity of 130 normal volunteers, including 77 women and 53 men aged 20-35 years, with no history of previous ocular surgery was measured using the Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer. Measurements were done on five corneal regions: central, nasal, inferior, temporal and superior. The findings were compared between men and women using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test.
Results: Mean age of male subjects was 28.0 years and that of female participants was 26.8 years (P = 0.063). There was a significant difference in corneal sensitivity between men and women in the superior (P = 0.013), temporal (P = 0.020) and inferior (P = 0.046) regions. There was no significant difference in corneal sensitivity in the central (P = 0.862) and nasal (P = 0.273) regions.
Conclusion: Except for the central and nasal regions, corneal sensitivity is significantly higher in men as compared to women. The reason for this difference is not yet evident. |
topic |
Corneal Sensitivity; Esthesiometery; Sex |
url |
http://www.jovr.org/article.asp?issn=2008-322X;year=2015;volume=10;issue=2;spage=102;epage=105;aulast=Khezri |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fatemehkhezri iscornealsensitivitysexdependent AT alimirzajani iscornealsensitivitysexdependent AT faridkarimian iscornealsensitivitysexdependent AT ebrahimjafarzadehpur iscornealsensitivitysexdependent |
_version_ |
1725823964356280320 |