Modernising the regulation of medical migration: moving from national monopolies to international markets

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Traditional top-down national regulation of internationally mobile doctors and nurses is fast being rendered obsolete by the speed of globalisation and digitisation. Here we propose a bottom-up system in which responsibility for hiri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Epstein Richard J, Epstein Stephen D
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-10-01
Series:BMC Medical Ethics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/13/26
id doaj-35dc4679c1524045b271fa5c9483d939
record_format Article
spelling doaj-35dc4679c1524045b271fa5c9483d9392020-11-25T03:51:28ZengBMCBMC Medical Ethics1472-69392012-10-011312610.1186/1472-6939-13-26Modernising the regulation of medical migration: moving from national monopolies to international marketsEpstein Richard JEpstein Stephen D<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Traditional top-down national regulation of internationally mobile doctors and nurses is fast being rendered obsolete by the speed of globalisation and digitisation. Here we propose a bottom-up system in which responsibility for hiring and accrediting overseas staff begins to be shared by medical employers, managers, and insurers.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>In this model, professional Boards would retain authority for disciplinary proceedings in response to local complaints, but would lose their present power of veto over foreign practitioners recruited by employers who have independently evaluated and approved such candidates' ability. Evaluations of this kind could be facilitated by globally accessible National Registers of professional work and conduct. A decentralised system of this kind could also dispense with time-consuming national oversight of continuing professional education and license revalidation, which tasks could be replaced over time by tighter institutional audit supported by stronger powers to terminate underperforming employees.</p> <p>Summary</p> <p>Market forces based on the reputation (and, hence, financial and political viability) of employers and institutions could continue to ensure patient safety in the future, while at the same time improving both national system efficiency and international professional mobility.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/13/26RegistrationMedical councilsGlobalisationBureaucracyCME/CPDRevalidation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Epstein Richard J
Epstein Stephen D
spellingShingle Epstein Richard J
Epstein Stephen D
Modernising the regulation of medical migration: moving from national monopolies to international markets
BMC Medical Ethics
Registration
Medical councils
Globalisation
Bureaucracy
CME/CPD
Revalidation
author_facet Epstein Richard J
Epstein Stephen D
author_sort Epstein Richard J
title Modernising the regulation of medical migration: moving from national monopolies to international markets
title_short Modernising the regulation of medical migration: moving from national monopolies to international markets
title_full Modernising the regulation of medical migration: moving from national monopolies to international markets
title_fullStr Modernising the regulation of medical migration: moving from national monopolies to international markets
title_full_unstemmed Modernising the regulation of medical migration: moving from national monopolies to international markets
title_sort modernising the regulation of medical migration: moving from national monopolies to international markets
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Ethics
issn 1472-6939
publishDate 2012-10-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Traditional top-down national regulation of internationally mobile doctors and nurses is fast being rendered obsolete by the speed of globalisation and digitisation. Here we propose a bottom-up system in which responsibility for hiring and accrediting overseas staff begins to be shared by medical employers, managers, and insurers.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>In this model, professional Boards would retain authority for disciplinary proceedings in response to local complaints, but would lose their present power of veto over foreign practitioners recruited by employers who have independently evaluated and approved such candidates' ability. Evaluations of this kind could be facilitated by globally accessible National Registers of professional work and conduct. A decentralised system of this kind could also dispense with time-consuming national oversight of continuing professional education and license revalidation, which tasks could be replaced over time by tighter institutional audit supported by stronger powers to terminate underperforming employees.</p> <p>Summary</p> <p>Market forces based on the reputation (and, hence, financial and political viability) of employers and institutions could continue to ensure patient safety in the future, while at the same time improving both national system efficiency and international professional mobility.</p>
topic Registration
Medical councils
Globalisation
Bureaucracy
CME/CPD
Revalidation
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/13/26
work_keys_str_mv AT epsteinrichardj modernisingtheregulationofmedicalmigrationmovingfromnationalmonopoliestointernationalmarkets
AT epsteinstephend modernisingtheregulationofmedicalmigrationmovingfromnationalmonopoliestointernationalmarkets
_version_ 1724487619220340736