Effect of constant light and immobilization stress on rat submandibular saliva secretory response induced by cholinergic and peptidergic agonists

The aim of this work was to analyse the parasympathetic control of submandibular saliva secretory response to cholinergic and peptidergic agonists in rats chronically exposed to constant light or repeated immobilization. Thirty two adult male Wistar rats were used: LL (8 rats exposed to constant lig...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Raquel Gallará, Rubén Ponce, Viviana Centeno, Salvador Bellavía
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad de Concepción. 2018-01-01
Series:Journal of Oral Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://joralres.com/index.php/JOR/article/view/joralres.2018.008/379
id doaj-35da8799d11a47bd87dd9e44f5bb57fc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-35da8799d11a47bd87dd9e44f5bb57fc2020-11-24T22:04:44ZengUniversidad de Concepción.Journal of Oral Research0719-24600719-24792018-01-0171161910.17126/JORALRES.2018.008Effect of constant light and immobilization stress on rat submandibular saliva secretory response induced by cholinergic and peptidergic agonistsRaquel Gallará0Rubén Ponce1Viviana Centeno2Salvador Bellavía3Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Odontología. Departamento de Biología Oral. Córdoba, ArgentinaUniversidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Odontología. Departamento de Biología Oral. Córdoba, ArgentinaUniversidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Odontología. Departamento de Biología Oral. Córdoba, ArgentinaUniversidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Odontología. Departamento de Biología Oral. Córdoba, ArgentinaThe aim of this work was to analyse the parasympathetic control of submandibular saliva secretory response to cholinergic and peptidergic agonists in rats chronically exposed to constant light or repeated immobilization. Thirty two adult male Wistar rats were used: LL (8 rats exposed to constant light for 20 days), IMO (8 rats submitted to 14:10 h light: dark cycle and immobilized 2 hours daily for 7 days), and control (16 rats not exposed to stress and submitted to 14:10 hours light:dark cycle). Saliva was collected under anesthesia from the salivary ducts of submandibular glands under increasing doses of methacholine and substance P. Secretory responses (μg/saliva/mg dry weight gland) to methacholine were significantly higher in LL and IMO groups compared to control for the following doses (μg/kg body weight): 3 (153±9 versus 46±3, p<0.001 and 76±3 versus 40±3, p<0.001), 10 (379±23 versus 277±8, p<0.001 and 275±19 versus 250±10, p<0.01) and 30 (729±25 versus 695±19, p<0.05 and 1008±39 versus 640±20, p<0.001). Also, responses to substance P were significantly increased in LL and IMO groups compared to control for the following doses: 0.2 (80±3 versus 30±3, p<0.01 and 94±16 versus 31±3, p<0.001), 0.5 (328±20 versus 231±16, p<0.01 and 531±31 versus 219±25,p<0.001), 1 (681±35 versus 547±30, p<0.01 and 1031±63 versus 563±53, p<0.001), and 5 (2222±88 versus 1868±59, p<0.01 and 3230±145 versus 1921±218, p<0.001). In conclusion, supersensitivity of secretory response to both agonists suggests that chronic exposure of rats to stressors capable of activating the sympathetic adrenal system promotes inhibition of the parasympathetic control of salivary secretionhttp://joralres.com/index.php/JOR/article/view/joralres.2018.008/379submandibular glandsalivasubstance Pmethacholineadverse effect
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Raquel Gallará
Rubén Ponce
Viviana Centeno
Salvador Bellavía
spellingShingle Raquel Gallará
Rubén Ponce
Viviana Centeno
Salvador Bellavía
Effect of constant light and immobilization stress on rat submandibular saliva secretory response induced by cholinergic and peptidergic agonists
Journal of Oral Research
submandibular gland
saliva
substance P
methacholine
adverse effect
author_facet Raquel Gallará
Rubén Ponce
Viviana Centeno
Salvador Bellavía
author_sort Raquel Gallará
title Effect of constant light and immobilization stress on rat submandibular saliva secretory response induced by cholinergic and peptidergic agonists
title_short Effect of constant light and immobilization stress on rat submandibular saliva secretory response induced by cholinergic and peptidergic agonists
title_full Effect of constant light and immobilization stress on rat submandibular saliva secretory response induced by cholinergic and peptidergic agonists
title_fullStr Effect of constant light and immobilization stress on rat submandibular saliva secretory response induced by cholinergic and peptidergic agonists
title_full_unstemmed Effect of constant light and immobilization stress on rat submandibular saliva secretory response induced by cholinergic and peptidergic agonists
title_sort effect of constant light and immobilization stress on rat submandibular saliva secretory response induced by cholinergic and peptidergic agonists
publisher Universidad de Concepción.
series Journal of Oral Research
issn 0719-2460
0719-2479
publishDate 2018-01-01
description The aim of this work was to analyse the parasympathetic control of submandibular saliva secretory response to cholinergic and peptidergic agonists in rats chronically exposed to constant light or repeated immobilization. Thirty two adult male Wistar rats were used: LL (8 rats exposed to constant light for 20 days), IMO (8 rats submitted to 14:10 h light: dark cycle and immobilized 2 hours daily for 7 days), and control (16 rats not exposed to stress and submitted to 14:10 hours light:dark cycle). Saliva was collected under anesthesia from the salivary ducts of submandibular glands under increasing doses of methacholine and substance P. Secretory responses (μg/saliva/mg dry weight gland) to methacholine were significantly higher in LL and IMO groups compared to control for the following doses (μg/kg body weight): 3 (153±9 versus 46±3, p<0.001 and 76±3 versus 40±3, p<0.001), 10 (379±23 versus 277±8, p<0.001 and 275±19 versus 250±10, p<0.01) and 30 (729±25 versus 695±19, p<0.05 and 1008±39 versus 640±20, p<0.001). Also, responses to substance P were significantly increased in LL and IMO groups compared to control for the following doses: 0.2 (80±3 versus 30±3, p<0.01 and 94±16 versus 31±3, p<0.001), 0.5 (328±20 versus 231±16, p<0.01 and 531±31 versus 219±25,p<0.001), 1 (681±35 versus 547±30, p<0.01 and 1031±63 versus 563±53, p<0.001), and 5 (2222±88 versus 1868±59, p<0.01 and 3230±145 versus 1921±218, p<0.001). In conclusion, supersensitivity of secretory response to both agonists suggests that chronic exposure of rats to stressors capable of activating the sympathetic adrenal system promotes inhibition of the parasympathetic control of salivary secretion
topic submandibular gland
saliva
substance P
methacholine
adverse effect
url http://joralres.com/index.php/JOR/article/view/joralres.2018.008/379
work_keys_str_mv AT raquelgallara effectofconstantlightandimmobilizationstressonratsubmandibularsalivasecretoryresponseinducedbycholinergicandpeptidergicagonists
AT rubenponce effectofconstantlightandimmobilizationstressonratsubmandibularsalivasecretoryresponseinducedbycholinergicandpeptidergicagonists
AT vivianacenteno effectofconstantlightandimmobilizationstressonratsubmandibularsalivasecretoryresponseinducedbycholinergicandpeptidergicagonists
AT salvadorbellavia effectofconstantlightandimmobilizationstressonratsubmandibularsalivasecretoryresponseinducedbycholinergicandpeptidergicagonists
_version_ 1725829038465875968