Evaluation of Above Ground Biomass Estimation Accuracy for Alpine Meadow Based on MODIS Vegetation Indices

Animal husbandry is the main agricultural type over the Tibetan Plateau, above ground biomass (AGB) is very important to monitor the productivity for administration of grassland resources and grazing balance. The MODIS vegetation indices have been successfully used in numerous studies on grassland A...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Meng Bao-Ping, Liang Tian-Gang, Ge Jing, Gao Jin-Long, Yin Jian-Peng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2017-01-01
Series:ITM Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20171202003
Description
Summary:Animal husbandry is the main agricultural type over the Tibetan Plateau, above ground biomass (AGB) is very important to monitor the productivity for administration of grassland resources and grazing balance. The MODIS vegetation indices have been successfully used in numerous studies on grassland AGB estimation in the Tibetan Plateau area. However, there are considerable differences of AGB estimation models both in the form of the models and the accuracy of estimation. In this study, field measurements of AGB data at Sangke Town, Gansu Province, China in four years (2013-2016) and MODIS indices (NDVI and EVI) are combined to construct AGB estimation models of alpine meadow grassland. The field measured AGB are also used to evaluate feasibility of models developed for large scale in applying to small area. The results show that (1) the differences in biomass were relatively large among the 5 sample areas of alpine meadow grassland in the study area during 2013-2016, with the maximum and minimum biomass values of 3,963 kg DW/ha and 745.5 kg DW/ha, respectively, and mean value of 1,907.7 kg DW/ha; the mean of EVI value range (0.42-0.60) are slightly smaller than the NDVI’s (0.59-0.75); (2) the optimum estimation model of grassland AGB in the study area is the exponential model based on MODIS EVI, with root mean square error of 656.6 kg DW/ha and relative estimation errors (REE) of 36.3%; (3) the estimation errors of grassland AGB models previously constructed at different spatial scales (the Tibetan Plateau, the Gannan Prefecture, and Xiahe County) are higher than those directly constructed based on the small area of this study by 9.5%–31.7%, with the increase of the modeling study area scales, the REE increasing as well. This study presents an improved monitoring algorithm of alpine natural grassland AGB estimation and provides a clear direction for future improvement of the grassland AGB estimation and grassland productivity from remote sensing technology.
ISSN:2271-2097