How haptic size sensations improve distance perception.

Determining distances to objects is one of the most ubiquitous perceptual tasks in everyday life. Nevertheless, it is challenging because the information from a single image confounds object size and distance. Though our brains frequently judge distances accurately, the underlying computations emplo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter W Battaglia, Daniel Kersten, Paul R Schrater
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011-06-01
Series:PLoS Computational Biology
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3127804?pdf=render
id doaj-359e39bb76084bc88dac70cf11b5d0a9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-359e39bb76084bc88dac70cf11b5d0a92020-11-24T21:51:15ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582011-06-0176e100208010.1371/journal.pcbi.1002080How haptic size sensations improve distance perception.Peter W BattagliaDaniel KerstenPaul R SchraterDetermining distances to objects is one of the most ubiquitous perceptual tasks in everyday life. Nevertheless, it is challenging because the information from a single image confounds object size and distance. Though our brains frequently judge distances accurately, the underlying computations employed by the brain are not well understood. Our work illuminates these computions by formulating a family of probabilistic models that encompass a variety of distinct hypotheses about distance and size perception. We compare these models' predictions to a set of human distance judgments in an interception experiment and use Bayesian analysis tools to quantitatively select the best hypothesis on the basis of its explanatory power and robustness over experimental data. The central question is: whether, and how, human distance perception incorporates size cues to improve accuracy. Our conclusions are: 1) humans incorporate haptic object size sensations for distance perception, 2) the incorporation of haptic sensations is suboptimal given their reliability, 3) humans use environmentally accurate size and distance priors, 4) distance judgments are produced by perceptual "posterior sampling". In addition, we compared our model's estimated sensory and motor noise parameters with previously reported measurements in the perceptual literature and found good correspondence between them. Taken together, these results represent a major step forward in establishing the computational underpinnings of human distance perception and the role of size information.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3127804?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peter W Battaglia
Daniel Kersten
Paul R Schrater
spellingShingle Peter W Battaglia
Daniel Kersten
Paul R Schrater
How haptic size sensations improve distance perception.
PLoS Computational Biology
author_facet Peter W Battaglia
Daniel Kersten
Paul R Schrater
author_sort Peter W Battaglia
title How haptic size sensations improve distance perception.
title_short How haptic size sensations improve distance perception.
title_full How haptic size sensations improve distance perception.
title_fullStr How haptic size sensations improve distance perception.
title_full_unstemmed How haptic size sensations improve distance perception.
title_sort how haptic size sensations improve distance perception.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Computational Biology
issn 1553-734X
1553-7358
publishDate 2011-06-01
description Determining distances to objects is one of the most ubiquitous perceptual tasks in everyday life. Nevertheless, it is challenging because the information from a single image confounds object size and distance. Though our brains frequently judge distances accurately, the underlying computations employed by the brain are not well understood. Our work illuminates these computions by formulating a family of probabilistic models that encompass a variety of distinct hypotheses about distance and size perception. We compare these models' predictions to a set of human distance judgments in an interception experiment and use Bayesian analysis tools to quantitatively select the best hypothesis on the basis of its explanatory power and robustness over experimental data. The central question is: whether, and how, human distance perception incorporates size cues to improve accuracy. Our conclusions are: 1) humans incorporate haptic object size sensations for distance perception, 2) the incorporation of haptic sensations is suboptimal given their reliability, 3) humans use environmentally accurate size and distance priors, 4) distance judgments are produced by perceptual "posterior sampling". In addition, we compared our model's estimated sensory and motor noise parameters with previously reported measurements in the perceptual literature and found good correspondence between them. Taken together, these results represent a major step forward in establishing the computational underpinnings of human distance perception and the role of size information.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3127804?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT peterwbattaglia howhapticsizesensationsimprovedistanceperception
AT danielkersten howhapticsizesensationsimprovedistanceperception
AT paulrschrater howhapticsizesensationsimprovedistanceperception
_version_ 1725879718996082688