Effect of Motor Imagery Training on Motor Learning in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

<i>Background</i>: There is an urgent need to systematically analyze the growing body of literature on the effect of motor imagery (MI) training in children and adolescents. <i>Methods</i>: Seven databases and clinicaltrials.gov were searched. Two reviewers independently scre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frank Behrendt, Valerie Zumbrunnen, Lynn Brem, Zorica Suica, Szabina Gäumann, Carina Ziller, Ulrich Gerth, Corina Schuster-Amft
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-09-01
Series:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9467
id doaj-35965fd1cd4242cda44b7112a367c2e1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-35965fd1cd4242cda44b7112a367c2e12021-09-26T00:17:38ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1661-78271660-46012021-09-01189467946710.3390/ijerph18189467Effect of Motor Imagery Training on Motor Learning in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisFrank Behrendt0Valerie Zumbrunnen1Lynn Brem2Zorica Suica3Szabina Gäumann4Carina Ziller5Ulrich Gerth6Corina Schuster-Amft7Reha Rheinfelden, Research Department, 4310 Rheinfelden, SwitzerlandReha Rheinfelden, Research Department, 4310 Rheinfelden, SwitzerlandReha Rheinfelden, Research Department, 4310 Rheinfelden, SwitzerlandReha Rheinfelden, Research Department, 4310 Rheinfelden, SwitzerlandReha Rheinfelden, Research Department, 4310 Rheinfelden, SwitzerlandReha Rheinfelden, Research Department, 4310 Rheinfelden, SwitzerlandReha Rheinfelden, Research Department, 4310 Rheinfelden, SwitzerlandReha Rheinfelden, Research Department, 4310 Rheinfelden, Switzerland<i>Background</i>: There is an urgent need to systematically analyze the growing body of literature on the effect of motor imagery (MI) training in children and adolescents. <i>Methods</i>: Seven databases and clinicaltrials.gov were searched. Two reviewers independently screened references and full texts, and extracted data (studies’ methodology, MI elements, temporal parameters). Two studies were meta-analyzed providing the standard mean difference (SDM). Selected studies were evaluated with the risk of bias (RoB) and GRADE tools. <i>Results</i>: A total of 7238 references were retrieved. The sample size of the 22 included studies, published between 1995 and 2021, ranged from 18 to 136 participants, totaling 934 (nine to 18 years). Studies included healthy pupils, mentally retarded adolescents, children with motor coordination difficulties or with mild mental disabilities. The motor learning tasks focused on upper, lower and whole body movements. SMDs for the primary outcome of pooled studies varied between 0.83 to 1.87 (95% CI, I<sup>2</sup>, T<sup>2</sup> varied 0.33–3.10; <i>p</i> = 0.001; 0–74%; 0–0.59). RoB varied between some concerns and high risk. GRADE rating was low. <i>Conclusions</i>: MI combined with physical practice (PP) might have a high potential for healthy and impaired children and adolescents. However, important reporting recommendations (PETTLEP, TIDieR, CONSORT) should be followed. The systematic review was registered with PROSPERO: CRD42021237361.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9467motor imagery trainingmental practicePETTLEPchildren and adolescentsrandomized controlled trialsystematic review and meta-analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Frank Behrendt
Valerie Zumbrunnen
Lynn Brem
Zorica Suica
Szabina Gäumann
Carina Ziller
Ulrich Gerth
Corina Schuster-Amft
spellingShingle Frank Behrendt
Valerie Zumbrunnen
Lynn Brem
Zorica Suica
Szabina Gäumann
Carina Ziller
Ulrich Gerth
Corina Schuster-Amft
Effect of Motor Imagery Training on Motor Learning in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
motor imagery training
mental practice
PETTLEP
children and adolescents
randomized controlled trial
systematic review and meta-analysis
author_facet Frank Behrendt
Valerie Zumbrunnen
Lynn Brem
Zorica Suica
Szabina Gäumann
Carina Ziller
Ulrich Gerth
Corina Schuster-Amft
author_sort Frank Behrendt
title Effect of Motor Imagery Training on Motor Learning in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Effect of Motor Imagery Training on Motor Learning in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Effect of Motor Imagery Training on Motor Learning in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Effect of Motor Imagery Training on Motor Learning in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Motor Imagery Training on Motor Learning in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort effect of motor imagery training on motor learning in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
issn 1661-7827
1660-4601
publishDate 2021-09-01
description <i>Background</i>: There is an urgent need to systematically analyze the growing body of literature on the effect of motor imagery (MI) training in children and adolescents. <i>Methods</i>: Seven databases and clinicaltrials.gov were searched. Two reviewers independently screened references and full texts, and extracted data (studies’ methodology, MI elements, temporal parameters). Two studies were meta-analyzed providing the standard mean difference (SDM). Selected studies were evaluated with the risk of bias (RoB) and GRADE tools. <i>Results</i>: A total of 7238 references were retrieved. The sample size of the 22 included studies, published between 1995 and 2021, ranged from 18 to 136 participants, totaling 934 (nine to 18 years). Studies included healthy pupils, mentally retarded adolescents, children with motor coordination difficulties or with mild mental disabilities. The motor learning tasks focused on upper, lower and whole body movements. SMDs for the primary outcome of pooled studies varied between 0.83 to 1.87 (95% CI, I<sup>2</sup>, T<sup>2</sup> varied 0.33–3.10; <i>p</i> = 0.001; 0–74%; 0–0.59). RoB varied between some concerns and high risk. GRADE rating was low. <i>Conclusions</i>: MI combined with physical practice (PP) might have a high potential for healthy and impaired children and adolescents. However, important reporting recommendations (PETTLEP, TIDieR, CONSORT) should be followed. The systematic review was registered with PROSPERO: CRD42021237361.
topic motor imagery training
mental practice
PETTLEP
children and adolescents
randomized controlled trial
systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9467
work_keys_str_mv AT frankbehrendt effectofmotorimagerytrainingonmotorlearninginchildrenandadolescentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT valeriezumbrunnen effectofmotorimagerytrainingonmotorlearninginchildrenandadolescentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lynnbrem effectofmotorimagerytrainingonmotorlearninginchildrenandadolescentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zoricasuica effectofmotorimagerytrainingonmotorlearninginchildrenandadolescentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT szabinagaumann effectofmotorimagerytrainingonmotorlearninginchildrenandadolescentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT carinaziller effectofmotorimagerytrainingonmotorlearninginchildrenandadolescentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ulrichgerth effectofmotorimagerytrainingonmotorlearninginchildrenandadolescentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT corinaschusteramft effectofmotorimagerytrainingonmotorlearninginchildrenandadolescentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1717366490291765248