Effect of Motor Imagery Training on Motor Learning in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
<i>Background</i>: There is an urgent need to systematically analyze the growing body of literature on the effect of motor imagery (MI) training in children and adolescents. <i>Methods</i>: Seven databases and clinicaltrials.gov were searched. Two reviewers independently scre...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-09-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9467 |
id |
doaj-35965fd1cd4242cda44b7112a367c2e1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-35965fd1cd4242cda44b7112a367c2e12021-09-26T00:17:38ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1661-78271660-46012021-09-01189467946710.3390/ijerph18189467Effect of Motor Imagery Training on Motor Learning in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisFrank Behrendt0Valerie Zumbrunnen1Lynn Brem2Zorica Suica3Szabina Gäumann4Carina Ziller5Ulrich Gerth6Corina Schuster-Amft7Reha Rheinfelden, Research Department, 4310 Rheinfelden, SwitzerlandReha Rheinfelden, Research Department, 4310 Rheinfelden, SwitzerlandReha Rheinfelden, Research Department, 4310 Rheinfelden, SwitzerlandReha Rheinfelden, Research Department, 4310 Rheinfelden, SwitzerlandReha Rheinfelden, Research Department, 4310 Rheinfelden, SwitzerlandReha Rheinfelden, Research Department, 4310 Rheinfelden, SwitzerlandReha Rheinfelden, Research Department, 4310 Rheinfelden, SwitzerlandReha Rheinfelden, Research Department, 4310 Rheinfelden, Switzerland<i>Background</i>: There is an urgent need to systematically analyze the growing body of literature on the effect of motor imagery (MI) training in children and adolescents. <i>Methods</i>: Seven databases and clinicaltrials.gov were searched. Two reviewers independently screened references and full texts, and extracted data (studies’ methodology, MI elements, temporal parameters). Two studies were meta-analyzed providing the standard mean difference (SDM). Selected studies were evaluated with the risk of bias (RoB) and GRADE tools. <i>Results</i>: A total of 7238 references were retrieved. The sample size of the 22 included studies, published between 1995 and 2021, ranged from 18 to 136 participants, totaling 934 (nine to 18 years). Studies included healthy pupils, mentally retarded adolescents, children with motor coordination difficulties or with mild mental disabilities. The motor learning tasks focused on upper, lower and whole body movements. SMDs for the primary outcome of pooled studies varied between 0.83 to 1.87 (95% CI, I<sup>2</sup>, T<sup>2</sup> varied 0.33–3.10; <i>p</i> = 0.001; 0–74%; 0–0.59). RoB varied between some concerns and high risk. GRADE rating was low. <i>Conclusions</i>: MI combined with physical practice (PP) might have a high potential for healthy and impaired children and adolescents. However, important reporting recommendations (PETTLEP, TIDieR, CONSORT) should be followed. The systematic review was registered with PROSPERO: CRD42021237361.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9467motor imagery trainingmental practicePETTLEPchildren and adolescentsrandomized controlled trialsystematic review and meta-analysis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Frank Behrendt Valerie Zumbrunnen Lynn Brem Zorica Suica Szabina Gäumann Carina Ziller Ulrich Gerth Corina Schuster-Amft |
spellingShingle |
Frank Behrendt Valerie Zumbrunnen Lynn Brem Zorica Suica Szabina Gäumann Carina Ziller Ulrich Gerth Corina Schuster-Amft Effect of Motor Imagery Training on Motor Learning in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health motor imagery training mental practice PETTLEP children and adolescents randomized controlled trial systematic review and meta-analysis |
author_facet |
Frank Behrendt Valerie Zumbrunnen Lynn Brem Zorica Suica Szabina Gäumann Carina Ziller Ulrich Gerth Corina Schuster-Amft |
author_sort |
Frank Behrendt |
title |
Effect of Motor Imagery Training on Motor Learning in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short |
Effect of Motor Imagery Training on Motor Learning in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full |
Effect of Motor Imagery Training on Motor Learning in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr |
Effect of Motor Imagery Training on Motor Learning in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of Motor Imagery Training on Motor Learning in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort |
effect of motor imagery training on motor learning in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
issn |
1661-7827 1660-4601 |
publishDate |
2021-09-01 |
description |
<i>Background</i>: There is an urgent need to systematically analyze the growing body of literature on the effect of motor imagery (MI) training in children and adolescents. <i>Methods</i>: Seven databases and clinicaltrials.gov were searched. Two reviewers independently screened references and full texts, and extracted data (studies’ methodology, MI elements, temporal parameters). Two studies were meta-analyzed providing the standard mean difference (SDM). Selected studies were evaluated with the risk of bias (RoB) and GRADE tools. <i>Results</i>: A total of 7238 references were retrieved. The sample size of the 22 included studies, published between 1995 and 2021, ranged from 18 to 136 participants, totaling 934 (nine to 18 years). Studies included healthy pupils, mentally retarded adolescents, children with motor coordination difficulties or with mild mental disabilities. The motor learning tasks focused on upper, lower and whole body movements. SMDs for the primary outcome of pooled studies varied between 0.83 to 1.87 (95% CI, I<sup>2</sup>, T<sup>2</sup> varied 0.33–3.10; <i>p</i> = 0.001; 0–74%; 0–0.59). RoB varied between some concerns and high risk. GRADE rating was low. <i>Conclusions</i>: MI combined with physical practice (PP) might have a high potential for healthy and impaired children and adolescents. However, important reporting recommendations (PETTLEP, TIDieR, CONSORT) should be followed. The systematic review was registered with PROSPERO: CRD42021237361. |
topic |
motor imagery training mental practice PETTLEP children and adolescents randomized controlled trial systematic review and meta-analysis |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9467 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT frankbehrendt effectofmotorimagerytrainingonmotorlearninginchildrenandadolescentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT valeriezumbrunnen effectofmotorimagerytrainingonmotorlearninginchildrenandadolescentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lynnbrem effectofmotorimagerytrainingonmotorlearninginchildrenandadolescentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zoricasuica effectofmotorimagerytrainingonmotorlearninginchildrenandadolescentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT szabinagaumann effectofmotorimagerytrainingonmotorlearninginchildrenandadolescentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT carinaziller effectofmotorimagerytrainingonmotorlearninginchildrenandadolescentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ulrichgerth effectofmotorimagerytrainingonmotorlearninginchildrenandadolescentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT corinaschusteramft effectofmotorimagerytrainingonmotorlearninginchildrenandadolescentsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |
_version_ |
1717366490291765248 |