Liberté religieuse contre liberté d’expression ? Pressions de conformité et rhétorique politiquement correcte

The dangers to freedom of expression are not always linked to frontal attacks, as is the charge of blasphemy. The freedom-destroying rhetoric increasingly takes on the appearance of the defence of human rights. Thus, religious freedom, the rejection of hate speech and the right to reputation (a corr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Guy Haarscher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Presses universitaires de Strasbourg 2020-11-01
Series:Revue du Droit des Religions
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/rdr/1211
id doaj-358e2dfce90d48dc8ccb5a629f5e015a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-358e2dfce90d48dc8ccb5a629f5e015a2021-05-03T04:44:50ZengPresses universitaires de StrasbourgRevue du Droit des Religions2493-86372534-74622020-11-0110335310.4000/rdr.1211Liberté religieuse contre liberté d’expression ? Pressions de conformité et rhétorique politiquement correcteGuy HaarscherThe dangers to freedom of expression are not always linked to frontal attacks, as is the charge of blasphemy. The freedom-destroying rhetoric increasingly takes on the appearance of the defence of human rights. Thus, religious freedom, the rejection of hate speech and the right to reputation (a correlative of the concept of defamation) – to name but three notions – can serve to endanger freedom of expression. This is almost invisible for those who do not seriously criticize the concepts used, since the “ugly word” of blasphemy is no longer pronounced and very politically correct concepts come to play the role of “censors” of free expression in its place. In this article I would like to provide some elements of deconstruction of this perilous rhetoric for freedoms.http://journals.openedition.org/rdr/1211
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Guy Haarscher
spellingShingle Guy Haarscher
Liberté religieuse contre liberté d’expression ? Pressions de conformité et rhétorique politiquement correcte
Revue du Droit des Religions
author_facet Guy Haarscher
author_sort Guy Haarscher
title Liberté religieuse contre liberté d’expression ? Pressions de conformité et rhétorique politiquement correcte
title_short Liberté religieuse contre liberté d’expression ? Pressions de conformité et rhétorique politiquement correcte
title_full Liberté religieuse contre liberté d’expression ? Pressions de conformité et rhétorique politiquement correcte
title_fullStr Liberté religieuse contre liberté d’expression ? Pressions de conformité et rhétorique politiquement correcte
title_full_unstemmed Liberté religieuse contre liberté d’expression ? Pressions de conformité et rhétorique politiquement correcte
title_sort liberté religieuse contre liberté d’expression ? pressions de conformité et rhétorique politiquement correcte
publisher Presses universitaires de Strasbourg
series Revue du Droit des Religions
issn 2493-8637
2534-7462
publishDate 2020-11-01
description The dangers to freedom of expression are not always linked to frontal attacks, as is the charge of blasphemy. The freedom-destroying rhetoric increasingly takes on the appearance of the defence of human rights. Thus, religious freedom, the rejection of hate speech and the right to reputation (a correlative of the concept of defamation) – to name but three notions – can serve to endanger freedom of expression. This is almost invisible for those who do not seriously criticize the concepts used, since the “ugly word” of blasphemy is no longer pronounced and very politically correct concepts come to play the role of “censors” of free expression in its place. In this article I would like to provide some elements of deconstruction of this perilous rhetoric for freedoms.
url http://journals.openedition.org/rdr/1211
work_keys_str_mv AT guyhaarscher libertereligieusecontrelibertedexpressionpressionsdeconformiteetrhetoriquepolitiquementcorrecte
_version_ 1721483641826050048