Accurate autocorrelation modeling substantially improves fMRI reliability
There has been recent controversy over the validity of commonly-used software packages for functional MRI (fMRI) data analysis. Here, the authors compare the performance of three leading packages (AFNI, FSL, SPM) in terms of temporal autocorrelation modeling, a key statistical step in fMRI analysis.
Main Authors: | Wiktor Olszowy, John Aston, Catarina Rua, Guy B. Williams |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Publishing Group
2019-03-01
|
Series: | Nature Communications |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09230-w |
Similar Items
-
Publisher Correction: Accurate autocorrelation modeling substantially improves fMRI reliability
by: Wiktor Olszowy, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01) -
Robust and Unbiased Variance of GLM Coefficients for Misspecified Autocorrelation and Hemodynamic Response Models in fMRI
by: Lourens Waldorp
Published: (2009-01-01) -
A protocol for ultra-high field laminar fMRI in the human brain
by: Ke Jia, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01) -
Impact of concatenating fMRI data on reliability for functional connectomics
by: Jae Wook Cho, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01) -
Improving the Test-Retest Reliability of Resting State fMRI by Removing the Impact of Sleep
by: Jiahui Wang, et al.
Published: (2017-05-01)