Individual Learning in Construction Projects: Professions and their Approaches
<p style="line-height: normal; margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt;"><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 12pt;">New materials, use of sophisticated technologies and increased customer demands, in combination with</span><span style="...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
UTS ePRESS
2010-10-01
|
Series: | Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building |
Online Access: | https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/AJCEB/article/view/1811 |
id |
doaj-35734221edaf46fc92c6b4338dfaeb96 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-35734221edaf46fc92c6b4338dfaeb962020-11-24T22:47:15ZengUTS ePRESSAustralasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building1835-63541837-91332010-10-0110310.5130/ajceb.v10i3.18111123Individual Learning in Construction Projects: Professions and their ApproachesIngeborg Wasif0Per-Erik Josephson1Alexander Styhre2Chalmers University of TechnologyChalmers University of TechnologyChalmers University of Technology<p style="line-height: normal; margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt;"><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 12pt;">New materials, use of sophisticated technologies and increased customer demands, in combination with</span><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"> </span></span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 12pt;">growing competition among construction companies, have led to a high organizational boundaries. The results indicate that personal networks are the most common source of learning for all professions. While clients, architects, and designers also engage in reading and attending courses, site managers and workers are less engaged in these activities. Experimenting and organizing for learning appear to be underutilized strategies by all professions. This leads to the conclusion that attempts to increase learning have to address the differences in learning behaviours of the various groups. Further, focus on experimenting and organizing for learning is a possibility to change the learning behaviour from learning as a consequence of problems to learning for future improvement.degree of specialization. For successful integration of the different professional specialists, there is a need for shared learning between project co-workers. Based on twenty eight interviews in six different Swedish construction projects, this paper illustrates strategies for individual and shared learning, among different actors and across various </span></p>https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/AJCEB/article/view/1811 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ingeborg Wasif Per-Erik Josephson Alexander Styhre |
spellingShingle |
Ingeborg Wasif Per-Erik Josephson Alexander Styhre Individual Learning in Construction Projects: Professions and their Approaches Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building |
author_facet |
Ingeborg Wasif Per-Erik Josephson Alexander Styhre |
author_sort |
Ingeborg Wasif |
title |
Individual Learning in Construction Projects: Professions and their Approaches |
title_short |
Individual Learning in Construction Projects: Professions and their Approaches |
title_full |
Individual Learning in Construction Projects: Professions and their Approaches |
title_fullStr |
Individual Learning in Construction Projects: Professions and their Approaches |
title_full_unstemmed |
Individual Learning in Construction Projects: Professions and their Approaches |
title_sort |
individual learning in construction projects: professions and their approaches |
publisher |
UTS ePRESS |
series |
Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building |
issn |
1835-6354 1837-9133 |
publishDate |
2010-10-01 |
description |
<p style="line-height: normal; margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt;"><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 12pt;">New materials, use of sophisticated technologies and increased customer demands, in combination with</span><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"> </span></span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 12pt;">growing competition among construction companies, have led to a high organizational boundaries. The results indicate that personal networks are the most common source of learning for all professions. While clients, architects, and designers also engage in reading and attending courses, site managers and workers are less engaged in these activities. Experimenting and organizing for learning appear to be underutilized strategies by all professions. This leads to the conclusion that attempts to increase learning have to address the differences in learning behaviours of the various groups. Further, focus on experimenting and organizing for learning is a possibility to change the learning behaviour from learning as a consequence of problems to learning for future improvement.degree of specialization. For successful integration of the different professional specialists, there is a need for shared learning between project co-workers. Based on twenty eight interviews in six different Swedish construction projects, this paper illustrates strategies for individual and shared learning, among different actors and across various </span></p> |
url |
https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/AJCEB/article/view/1811 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ingeborgwasif individuallearninginconstructionprojectsprofessionsandtheirapproaches AT pererikjosephson individuallearninginconstructionprojectsprofessionsandtheirapproaches AT alexanderstyhre individuallearninginconstructionprojectsprofessionsandtheirapproaches |
_version_ |
1725682393908510720 |