Individual Learning in Construction Projects: Professions and their Approaches

<p style="line-height: normal; margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;; font-size: 12pt;">New materials, use of sophisticated technologies and increased customer demands, in combination with</span><span style="...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ingeborg Wasif, Per-Erik Josephson, Alexander Styhre
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UTS ePRESS 2010-10-01
Series:Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building
Online Access:https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/AJCEB/article/view/1811
id doaj-35734221edaf46fc92c6b4338dfaeb96
record_format Article
spelling doaj-35734221edaf46fc92c6b4338dfaeb962020-11-24T22:47:15ZengUTS ePRESSAustralasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building1835-63541837-91332010-10-0110310.5130/ajceb.v10i3.18111123Individual Learning in Construction Projects: Professions and their ApproachesIngeborg Wasif0Per-Erik Josephson1Alexander Styhre2Chalmers University of TechnologyChalmers University of TechnologyChalmers University of Technology<p style="line-height: normal; margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;; font-size: 12pt;">New materials, use of sophisticated technologies and increased customer demands, in combination with</span><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"> </span></span><span style="font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;; font-size: 12pt;">growing competition among construction companies, have led to a high organizational boundaries. The results indicate that personal networks are the most common source of learning for all professions. While clients, architects, and designers also engage in reading and attending courses, site managers and workers are less engaged in these activities. Experimenting and organizing for learning appear to be underutilized strategies by all professions. This leads to the conclusion that attempts to increase learning have to address the differences in learning behaviours of the various groups. Further, focus on experimenting and organizing for learning is a possibility to change the learning behaviour from learning as a consequence of problems to learning for future improvement.degree of specialization. For successful integration of the different professional specialists, there is a need for shared learning between project co-workers. Based on twenty eight interviews in six different Swedish construction projects, this paper illustrates strategies for individual and shared learning, among different actors and across various </span></p>https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/AJCEB/article/view/1811
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ingeborg Wasif
Per-Erik Josephson
Alexander Styhre
spellingShingle Ingeborg Wasif
Per-Erik Josephson
Alexander Styhre
Individual Learning in Construction Projects: Professions and their Approaches
Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building
author_facet Ingeborg Wasif
Per-Erik Josephson
Alexander Styhre
author_sort Ingeborg Wasif
title Individual Learning in Construction Projects: Professions and their Approaches
title_short Individual Learning in Construction Projects: Professions and their Approaches
title_full Individual Learning in Construction Projects: Professions and their Approaches
title_fullStr Individual Learning in Construction Projects: Professions and their Approaches
title_full_unstemmed Individual Learning in Construction Projects: Professions and their Approaches
title_sort individual learning in construction projects: professions and their approaches
publisher UTS ePRESS
series Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building
issn 1835-6354
1837-9133
publishDate 2010-10-01
description <p style="line-height: normal; margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;; font-size: 12pt;">New materials, use of sophisticated technologies and increased customer demands, in combination with</span><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="font-family: Arial;"> </span></span><span style="font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;; font-size: 12pt;">growing competition among construction companies, have led to a high organizational boundaries. The results indicate that personal networks are the most common source of learning for all professions. While clients, architects, and designers also engage in reading and attending courses, site managers and workers are less engaged in these activities. Experimenting and organizing for learning appear to be underutilized strategies by all professions. This leads to the conclusion that attempts to increase learning have to address the differences in learning behaviours of the various groups. Further, focus on experimenting and organizing for learning is a possibility to change the learning behaviour from learning as a consequence of problems to learning for future improvement.degree of specialization. For successful integration of the different professional specialists, there is a need for shared learning between project co-workers. Based on twenty eight interviews in six different Swedish construction projects, this paper illustrates strategies for individual and shared learning, among different actors and across various </span></p>
url https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/AJCEB/article/view/1811
work_keys_str_mv AT ingeborgwasif individuallearninginconstructionprojectsprofessionsandtheirapproaches
AT pererikjosephson individuallearninginconstructionprojectsprofessionsandtheirapproaches
AT alexanderstyhre individuallearninginconstructionprojectsprofessionsandtheirapproaches
_version_ 1725682393908510720