Internalized weight bias and psychological wellbeing: An exploratory investigation of a preliminary model.

Although a growing body of literature demonstrates negative effects of internalized weight bias (IWB), the relationships between IWB and relevant social, psychological, and behavioral variables have not yet been evaluated systematically. The purpose of the present study was to create and assess a mo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Morgan S Lee, Brian D Gonzalez, Brent J Small, Joel Kevin Thompson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216324
id doaj-3561252e08bd4cfa80f9533abaa23e63
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3561252e08bd4cfa80f9533abaa23e632021-03-03T20:41:32ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01145e021632410.1371/journal.pone.0216324Internalized weight bias and psychological wellbeing: An exploratory investigation of a preliminary model.Morgan S LeeBrian D GonzalezBrent J SmallJoel Kevin ThompsonAlthough a growing body of literature demonstrates negative effects of internalized weight bias (IWB), the relationships between IWB and relevant social, psychological, and behavioral variables have not yet been evaluated systematically. The purpose of the present study was to create and assess a model of hypothesized risks and outcomes of IWB. In an online survey, 650 adult males and females completed self-report measures of IWB, self-esteem, weight-related stigma experiences, body-related shame, body satisfaction, societal influence on body image, appearance comparisons, binge eating, distress, and weight-related quality of life. The originally hypothesized model did not provide an adequate fit to the data. Iterative modifications were undertaken, and the resulting model, in which social factors were associated with IWB and body image-related constructs which were in turn associated with psychological and behavioral outcomes, provided excellent fit to the data (CFI > .99, SRMR = .02, and RMSEA = .03). Most model paths were similar for underweight or normal weight participants versus participants with overweight or obesity. This study represents an initial effort at constructing a comprehensive model of IWB that can be further refined in future research and used to help guide the development of related interventions.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216324
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Morgan S Lee
Brian D Gonzalez
Brent J Small
Joel Kevin Thompson
spellingShingle Morgan S Lee
Brian D Gonzalez
Brent J Small
Joel Kevin Thompson
Internalized weight bias and psychological wellbeing: An exploratory investigation of a preliminary model.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Morgan S Lee
Brian D Gonzalez
Brent J Small
Joel Kevin Thompson
author_sort Morgan S Lee
title Internalized weight bias and psychological wellbeing: An exploratory investigation of a preliminary model.
title_short Internalized weight bias and psychological wellbeing: An exploratory investigation of a preliminary model.
title_full Internalized weight bias and psychological wellbeing: An exploratory investigation of a preliminary model.
title_fullStr Internalized weight bias and psychological wellbeing: An exploratory investigation of a preliminary model.
title_full_unstemmed Internalized weight bias and psychological wellbeing: An exploratory investigation of a preliminary model.
title_sort internalized weight bias and psychological wellbeing: an exploratory investigation of a preliminary model.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Although a growing body of literature demonstrates negative effects of internalized weight bias (IWB), the relationships between IWB and relevant social, psychological, and behavioral variables have not yet been evaluated systematically. The purpose of the present study was to create and assess a model of hypothesized risks and outcomes of IWB. In an online survey, 650 adult males and females completed self-report measures of IWB, self-esteem, weight-related stigma experiences, body-related shame, body satisfaction, societal influence on body image, appearance comparisons, binge eating, distress, and weight-related quality of life. The originally hypothesized model did not provide an adequate fit to the data. Iterative modifications were undertaken, and the resulting model, in which social factors were associated with IWB and body image-related constructs which were in turn associated with psychological and behavioral outcomes, provided excellent fit to the data (CFI > .99, SRMR = .02, and RMSEA = .03). Most model paths were similar for underweight or normal weight participants versus participants with overweight or obesity. This study represents an initial effort at constructing a comprehensive model of IWB that can be further refined in future research and used to help guide the development of related interventions.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216324
work_keys_str_mv AT morganslee internalizedweightbiasandpsychologicalwellbeinganexploratoryinvestigationofapreliminarymodel
AT briandgonzalez internalizedweightbiasandpsychologicalwellbeinganexploratoryinvestigationofapreliminarymodel
AT brentjsmall internalizedweightbiasandpsychologicalwellbeinganexploratoryinvestigationofapreliminarymodel
AT joelkevinthompson internalizedweightbiasandpsychologicalwellbeinganexploratoryinvestigationofapreliminarymodel
_version_ 1714821128721006592