Pediatric SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence during mitigation procedures in Southwestern Pennsylvania

• Main Authors: Glenn J. Rapsinski, MD, PhD, Megan Culler Freeman, MD, PhD, Ghady Haidar, MD, Steven H Belle, PhD, MScHyg, Joanne H Hasskamp, MS, Sarah E. Wheeler, PhD
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier 2021-09-01
• Series: Journal of Clinical Virology Plus
• Subjects: SARS-CoV-2; Antibodies; Epidemiology; Seroprevalence
• Online Access: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667038021000181

Background: Children infected with SARS-CoV-2 are often asymptomatic or have only mild symptoms, leading to underestimation of disease prevalence in symptom-based testing strategies. Objectives: This study sought to determine pediatric SARS-CoV-2 disease burden during local mitigation efforts by using antibody testing to compare seroprevalence estimates to cumulative PCR prevalence estimates. Study design: In this cross-sectional study, we collected 1142 strict phase and 1196 relaxed phase remnant blood specimens from patients less than 19-years-old in southwestern Pennsylvania (SWPA). Patients were excluded if their residential zip code was outside the region of interest, if they were under 6-months-old, or they had recently received antibody-modifying treatments. Demographic, encounter, and laboratory electronic medical record information was extracted. Samples were tested for SARS-CoV-2 spike protein IgG using an EUA ELISA, and PCR results were recorded from county health department data. Seroprevalence and Clopper-Pearson exact 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Results: The observed seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibodies in children during strictest mitigation was 0.53% (95% CI 0.19, 1.14) and 0.92% (95% CI 0.46,1.64) during moderately relaxed. Strict and relaxed phase PCR-based prevalence were significantly higher, 2.87% (95% CI 1.95, 4.08) and 3.64 (95% CI 3.01, 4.38), respectively. Conclusions: Estimates of pediatric seroprevalence were significantly lower than cumulative PCR prevalence estimates, and less than adult seroprevalence estimates, potentially due to biological, population, or sampling differences. Biological differences in pediatric immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 may make serosurvey interpretation challenging and these differences warrant further study.