Evaluation of inhibitor-resistant real-time PCR methods for diagnostics in clinical and environmental samples.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is commonly used for pathogen detection in clinical and environmental samples. These sample matrices often contain inhibitors of PCR, which is a primary reason for sample processing; however, the purification process is highly inefficient, becoming unacceptable at low...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adrienne Trombley Hall, Ashley McKay Zovanyi, Deanna Rose Christensen, Jeffrey William Koehler, Timothy Devins Minogue
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3767612?pdf=render
id doaj-35518715e11a43b79b6023324d811c64
record_format Article
spelling doaj-35518715e11a43b79b6023324d811c642020-11-24T21:54:20ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0189e7384510.1371/journal.pone.0073845Evaluation of inhibitor-resistant real-time PCR methods for diagnostics in clinical and environmental samples.Adrienne Trombley HallAshley McKay ZovanyiDeanna Rose ChristensenJeffrey William KoehlerTimothy Devins MinoguePolymerase chain reaction (PCR) is commonly used for pathogen detection in clinical and environmental samples. These sample matrices often contain inhibitors of PCR, which is a primary reason for sample processing; however, the purification process is highly inefficient, becoming unacceptable at lower signature concentrations. One potential solution is direct PCR assessment without sample processing. Here, we evaluated nine inhibitor-resistant PCR reagents for direct detection of Francisella tularensis in seven different clinical and environmental samples using an established real-time PCR assay to assess ability to overcome PCR inhibition. While several of these reagents were designed for standard PCR, the described inhibitor resistant properties (ex. Omni Klentaq can amplify target DNA samples of up to 20% whole blood or soil) led to our evaluation with real-time PCR. A preliminary limit of detection (LOD) was determined for each chemistry in whole blood and buffer, and LODs (20 replicates) were determined for the top five chemistries in each matrix (buffer, whole blood, sputum, stool, swab, soil, and sand). Not surprisingly, no single chemistry performed the best across all of the different matrices evaluated. For instance, Phusion Blood Direct PCR Kit, Phire Hot Start DNA polymerase, and Phire Hot Start DNA polymerase with STR Boost performed best for direct detection in whole blood while Phire Hot Start DNA polymerase with STR Boost were the only reagents to yield an LOD in the femtogram range for soil. Although not the best performer across all matrices, KAPA Blood PCR kit produced the most consistent results among the various conditions assessed. Overall, while these inhibitor resistant reagents show promise for direct amplification of complex samples by real-time PCR, the amount of template required for detection would not be in a clinically relevant range for most matrices.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3767612?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Adrienne Trombley Hall
Ashley McKay Zovanyi
Deanna Rose Christensen
Jeffrey William Koehler
Timothy Devins Minogue
spellingShingle Adrienne Trombley Hall
Ashley McKay Zovanyi
Deanna Rose Christensen
Jeffrey William Koehler
Timothy Devins Minogue
Evaluation of inhibitor-resistant real-time PCR methods for diagnostics in clinical and environmental samples.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Adrienne Trombley Hall
Ashley McKay Zovanyi
Deanna Rose Christensen
Jeffrey William Koehler
Timothy Devins Minogue
author_sort Adrienne Trombley Hall
title Evaluation of inhibitor-resistant real-time PCR methods for diagnostics in clinical and environmental samples.
title_short Evaluation of inhibitor-resistant real-time PCR methods for diagnostics in clinical and environmental samples.
title_full Evaluation of inhibitor-resistant real-time PCR methods for diagnostics in clinical and environmental samples.
title_fullStr Evaluation of inhibitor-resistant real-time PCR methods for diagnostics in clinical and environmental samples.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of inhibitor-resistant real-time PCR methods for diagnostics in clinical and environmental samples.
title_sort evaluation of inhibitor-resistant real-time pcr methods for diagnostics in clinical and environmental samples.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is commonly used for pathogen detection in clinical and environmental samples. These sample matrices often contain inhibitors of PCR, which is a primary reason for sample processing; however, the purification process is highly inefficient, becoming unacceptable at lower signature concentrations. One potential solution is direct PCR assessment without sample processing. Here, we evaluated nine inhibitor-resistant PCR reagents for direct detection of Francisella tularensis in seven different clinical and environmental samples using an established real-time PCR assay to assess ability to overcome PCR inhibition. While several of these reagents were designed for standard PCR, the described inhibitor resistant properties (ex. Omni Klentaq can amplify target DNA samples of up to 20% whole blood or soil) led to our evaluation with real-time PCR. A preliminary limit of detection (LOD) was determined for each chemistry in whole blood and buffer, and LODs (20 replicates) were determined for the top five chemistries in each matrix (buffer, whole blood, sputum, stool, swab, soil, and sand). Not surprisingly, no single chemistry performed the best across all of the different matrices evaluated. For instance, Phusion Blood Direct PCR Kit, Phire Hot Start DNA polymerase, and Phire Hot Start DNA polymerase with STR Boost performed best for direct detection in whole blood while Phire Hot Start DNA polymerase with STR Boost were the only reagents to yield an LOD in the femtogram range for soil. Although not the best performer across all matrices, KAPA Blood PCR kit produced the most consistent results among the various conditions assessed. Overall, while these inhibitor resistant reagents show promise for direct amplification of complex samples by real-time PCR, the amount of template required for detection would not be in a clinically relevant range for most matrices.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3767612?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT adriennetrombleyhall evaluationofinhibitorresistantrealtimepcrmethodsfordiagnosticsinclinicalandenvironmentalsamples
AT ashleymckayzovanyi evaluationofinhibitorresistantrealtimepcrmethodsfordiagnosticsinclinicalandenvironmentalsamples
AT deannarosechristensen evaluationofinhibitorresistantrealtimepcrmethodsfordiagnosticsinclinicalandenvironmentalsamples
AT jeffreywilliamkoehler evaluationofinhibitorresistantrealtimepcrmethodsfordiagnosticsinclinicalandenvironmentalsamples
AT timothydevinsminogue evaluationofinhibitorresistantrealtimepcrmethodsfordiagnosticsinclinicalandenvironmentalsamples
_version_ 1725867559498022912