Evaluation of inhibitor-resistant real-time PCR methods for diagnostics in clinical and environmental samples.
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is commonly used for pathogen detection in clinical and environmental samples. These sample matrices often contain inhibitors of PCR, which is a primary reason for sample processing; however, the purification process is highly inefficient, becoming unacceptable at low...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2013-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3767612?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-35518715e11a43b79b6023324d811c64 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-35518715e11a43b79b6023324d811c642020-11-24T21:54:20ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0189e7384510.1371/journal.pone.0073845Evaluation of inhibitor-resistant real-time PCR methods for diagnostics in clinical and environmental samples.Adrienne Trombley HallAshley McKay ZovanyiDeanna Rose ChristensenJeffrey William KoehlerTimothy Devins MinoguePolymerase chain reaction (PCR) is commonly used for pathogen detection in clinical and environmental samples. These sample matrices often contain inhibitors of PCR, which is a primary reason for sample processing; however, the purification process is highly inefficient, becoming unacceptable at lower signature concentrations. One potential solution is direct PCR assessment without sample processing. Here, we evaluated nine inhibitor-resistant PCR reagents for direct detection of Francisella tularensis in seven different clinical and environmental samples using an established real-time PCR assay to assess ability to overcome PCR inhibition. While several of these reagents were designed for standard PCR, the described inhibitor resistant properties (ex. Omni Klentaq can amplify target DNA samples of up to 20% whole blood or soil) led to our evaluation with real-time PCR. A preliminary limit of detection (LOD) was determined for each chemistry in whole blood and buffer, and LODs (20 replicates) were determined for the top five chemistries in each matrix (buffer, whole blood, sputum, stool, swab, soil, and sand). Not surprisingly, no single chemistry performed the best across all of the different matrices evaluated. For instance, Phusion Blood Direct PCR Kit, Phire Hot Start DNA polymerase, and Phire Hot Start DNA polymerase with STR Boost performed best for direct detection in whole blood while Phire Hot Start DNA polymerase with STR Boost were the only reagents to yield an LOD in the femtogram range for soil. Although not the best performer across all matrices, KAPA Blood PCR kit produced the most consistent results among the various conditions assessed. Overall, while these inhibitor resistant reagents show promise for direct amplification of complex samples by real-time PCR, the amount of template required for detection would not be in a clinically relevant range for most matrices.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3767612?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Adrienne Trombley Hall Ashley McKay Zovanyi Deanna Rose Christensen Jeffrey William Koehler Timothy Devins Minogue |
spellingShingle |
Adrienne Trombley Hall Ashley McKay Zovanyi Deanna Rose Christensen Jeffrey William Koehler Timothy Devins Minogue Evaluation of inhibitor-resistant real-time PCR methods for diagnostics in clinical and environmental samples. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Adrienne Trombley Hall Ashley McKay Zovanyi Deanna Rose Christensen Jeffrey William Koehler Timothy Devins Minogue |
author_sort |
Adrienne Trombley Hall |
title |
Evaluation of inhibitor-resistant real-time PCR methods for diagnostics in clinical and environmental samples. |
title_short |
Evaluation of inhibitor-resistant real-time PCR methods for diagnostics in clinical and environmental samples. |
title_full |
Evaluation of inhibitor-resistant real-time PCR methods for diagnostics in clinical and environmental samples. |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of inhibitor-resistant real-time PCR methods for diagnostics in clinical and environmental samples. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of inhibitor-resistant real-time PCR methods for diagnostics in clinical and environmental samples. |
title_sort |
evaluation of inhibitor-resistant real-time pcr methods for diagnostics in clinical and environmental samples. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2013-01-01 |
description |
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is commonly used for pathogen detection in clinical and environmental samples. These sample matrices often contain inhibitors of PCR, which is a primary reason for sample processing; however, the purification process is highly inefficient, becoming unacceptable at lower signature concentrations. One potential solution is direct PCR assessment without sample processing. Here, we evaluated nine inhibitor-resistant PCR reagents for direct detection of Francisella tularensis in seven different clinical and environmental samples using an established real-time PCR assay to assess ability to overcome PCR inhibition. While several of these reagents were designed for standard PCR, the described inhibitor resistant properties (ex. Omni Klentaq can amplify target DNA samples of up to 20% whole blood or soil) led to our evaluation with real-time PCR. A preliminary limit of detection (LOD) was determined for each chemistry in whole blood and buffer, and LODs (20 replicates) were determined for the top five chemistries in each matrix (buffer, whole blood, sputum, stool, swab, soil, and sand). Not surprisingly, no single chemistry performed the best across all of the different matrices evaluated. For instance, Phusion Blood Direct PCR Kit, Phire Hot Start DNA polymerase, and Phire Hot Start DNA polymerase with STR Boost performed best for direct detection in whole blood while Phire Hot Start DNA polymerase with STR Boost were the only reagents to yield an LOD in the femtogram range for soil. Although not the best performer across all matrices, KAPA Blood PCR kit produced the most consistent results among the various conditions assessed. Overall, while these inhibitor resistant reagents show promise for direct amplification of complex samples by real-time PCR, the amount of template required for detection would not be in a clinically relevant range for most matrices. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3767612?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT adriennetrombleyhall evaluationofinhibitorresistantrealtimepcrmethodsfordiagnosticsinclinicalandenvironmentalsamples AT ashleymckayzovanyi evaluationofinhibitorresistantrealtimepcrmethodsfordiagnosticsinclinicalandenvironmentalsamples AT deannarosechristensen evaluationofinhibitorresistantrealtimepcrmethodsfordiagnosticsinclinicalandenvironmentalsamples AT jeffreywilliamkoehler evaluationofinhibitorresistantrealtimepcrmethodsfordiagnosticsinclinicalandenvironmentalsamples AT timothydevinsminogue evaluationofinhibitorresistantrealtimepcrmethodsfordiagnosticsinclinicalandenvironmentalsamples |
_version_ |
1725867559498022912 |