Four statements questioning the EU control strategy against Xylella fastidiosa

Abstract This opinion addresses questions concerning the EU control strategy against Xylella fastidiosa: i) factors affecting symptom expression and spread of X. fastidiosa; ii) the aetiology of the CoDiRO (Complesso del Disseccamento Rapido dell'Olivo) disease; iii) host plant removal as an op...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-03-01
Series:EFSA Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4450
id doaj-353dc9f2c4a243908ecec2d1fa0ba11b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-353dc9f2c4a243908ecec2d1fa0ba11b2021-09-09T18:10:27ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322016-03-01143n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4450Four statements questioning the EU control strategy against Xylella fastidiosaEFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH)Abstract This opinion addresses questions concerning the EU control strategy against Xylella fastidiosa: i) factors affecting symptom expression and spread of X. fastidiosa; ii) the aetiology of the CoDiRO (Complesso del Disseccamento Rapido dell'Olivo) disease; iii) host plant removal as an option for containment or eradication; and iv) secondary effects of pesticides. Xylella fastidiosa subsp. pauca was shown to be the causal agent of the CoDiRO disease of olives by recent biological assays fulfilling Koch's postulates. Symptoms in X. fastidiosa infected plants develop because of wilting from water stress induced by bacteria clogging the xylem vessels. Therefore, interventions supporting vigorous growth and development of the plant may improve its health status, its resilience, prolong its productive phase and extend the symptomless phase of the disease. The Panel considers removal of infected plants, in a system‐based approach, as the only option to prevent further spread of the pathogen to new areas. In the outer strip of the containment area bordering the buffer zone, removal of infected plants and stringent monitoring can be effective in preventing pathogen spread into the buffer zone. In areas of recent introduction, such as new outbreaks in the buffer zone, the stringent removal of both infected plants and all host plants irrespective of their health status within a radius, as described in current EU legislation, can be effective in reducing pathogen spread, when rigorously administered and new infections are detected in time. Finally, the reduction of vector populations by application of chemical or biological means, mechanical treatments, or other sustainable methods, can have effects in slowing down the pathogen spread. Concerning the use of pesticides, there is currently no evidence of negative effects of such treatments on the interaction of X. fastidiosa with infected olive trees, the severity of symptoms and the outcome of the infection.https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4450CoDiRO straincontainmenteradicationKoch's postulatepesticidessoil
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH)
spellingShingle EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH)
Four statements questioning the EU control strategy against Xylella fastidiosa
EFSA Journal
CoDiRO strain
containment
eradication
Koch's postulate
pesticides
soil
author_facet EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH)
author_sort EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH)
title Four statements questioning the EU control strategy against Xylella fastidiosa
title_short Four statements questioning the EU control strategy against Xylella fastidiosa
title_full Four statements questioning the EU control strategy against Xylella fastidiosa
title_fullStr Four statements questioning the EU control strategy against Xylella fastidiosa
title_full_unstemmed Four statements questioning the EU control strategy against Xylella fastidiosa
title_sort four statements questioning the eu control strategy against xylella fastidiosa
publisher Wiley
series EFSA Journal
issn 1831-4732
publishDate 2016-03-01
description Abstract This opinion addresses questions concerning the EU control strategy against Xylella fastidiosa: i) factors affecting symptom expression and spread of X. fastidiosa; ii) the aetiology of the CoDiRO (Complesso del Disseccamento Rapido dell'Olivo) disease; iii) host plant removal as an option for containment or eradication; and iv) secondary effects of pesticides. Xylella fastidiosa subsp. pauca was shown to be the causal agent of the CoDiRO disease of olives by recent biological assays fulfilling Koch's postulates. Symptoms in X. fastidiosa infected plants develop because of wilting from water stress induced by bacteria clogging the xylem vessels. Therefore, interventions supporting vigorous growth and development of the plant may improve its health status, its resilience, prolong its productive phase and extend the symptomless phase of the disease. The Panel considers removal of infected plants, in a system‐based approach, as the only option to prevent further spread of the pathogen to new areas. In the outer strip of the containment area bordering the buffer zone, removal of infected plants and stringent monitoring can be effective in preventing pathogen spread into the buffer zone. In areas of recent introduction, such as new outbreaks in the buffer zone, the stringent removal of both infected plants and all host plants irrespective of their health status within a radius, as described in current EU legislation, can be effective in reducing pathogen spread, when rigorously administered and new infections are detected in time. Finally, the reduction of vector populations by application of chemical or biological means, mechanical treatments, or other sustainable methods, can have effects in slowing down the pathogen spread. Concerning the use of pesticides, there is currently no evidence of negative effects of such treatments on the interaction of X. fastidiosa with infected olive trees, the severity of symptoms and the outcome of the infection.
topic CoDiRO strain
containment
eradication
Koch's postulate
pesticides
soil
url https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4450
work_keys_str_mv AT efsapanelonplanthealthplh fourstatementsquestioningtheeucontrolstrategyagainstxylellafastidiosa
_version_ 1717758929481498624