Couples extrinsic emotion regulation questionnaire: Psychometric validation in a Chilean population.

The way couples regulate their emotions affects the quality of their relationship. Despite this, no evidence-based scales of validity and reliability can measure the intention to regulate emotions in the romantic dyad. In order to address this gap, we developed the Couples Extrinsic Emotion Regulati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ana Kinkead, Susana Sanduvete-Chaves, Salvador Chacón-Moscoso, Christian E Salas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252329
id doaj-3539544ff614450d978682e6a20bcc83
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3539544ff614450d978682e6a20bcc832021-06-19T04:34:55ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01166e025232910.1371/journal.pone.0252329Couples extrinsic emotion regulation questionnaire: Psychometric validation in a Chilean population.Ana KinkeadSusana Sanduvete-ChavesSalvador Chacón-MoscosoChristian E SalasThe way couples regulate their emotions affects the quality of their relationship. Despite this, no evidence-based scales of validity and reliability can measure the intention to regulate emotions in the romantic dyad. In order to address this gap, we developed the Couples Extrinsic Emotion Regulation (CEER) questionnaire. First, we adapted the "Others" subscale from the Emotion Regulation of Others and Self questionnaire (EROS) for any close relationship to measure the intention to regulate emotions in couples; second, the psychometric properties of the CEER questionnaire were studied. For the content validity assessment, 23 experts (47.8% of whom worked in social and health psychology and the psychology of emotions, 17.4% in couples' therapy, and 34.8% in social science methodologies) participated. A total of 528 Chileans completed the online CEER questionnaire, the relationship satisfaction scale (RAS) and dyadic adjustment scale (DAS): 27.8% were male, age M = 38.7, SD = 10.05, and time of the relationships M = 11.27, SD = 9.82. The content-based validity study made it possible to determine which items to include in the final version. Two unrelated first-order factors structure of the original test fit (RMSEA = .052, GFI = .97, AGFI = .95; CFI = .99; NFI = .98; and NNFI = .98). The CEER+ and CEER- factors presented adequate internal consistency (α = .79; ω = .80 and α = .85; ω = .85, respectively). The discrimination index of the factors were excellent (CEER+ = .55 and CEER- = .63). Validity evidence based on the relations to other variables showed a direct positive relation between CEER+, RAS and overall DAS, as well as their factors; and a negative relation between CEER-, RAS overall DAS, as well as their factors. The use of this instrument is recommended for the identification of Chilean couples where at least one of the partners has a less favorable opinion of their relationship, providing relevant data for couple's therapy.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252329
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ana Kinkead
Susana Sanduvete-Chaves
Salvador Chacón-Moscoso
Christian E Salas
spellingShingle Ana Kinkead
Susana Sanduvete-Chaves
Salvador Chacón-Moscoso
Christian E Salas
Couples extrinsic emotion regulation questionnaire: Psychometric validation in a Chilean population.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Ana Kinkead
Susana Sanduvete-Chaves
Salvador Chacón-Moscoso
Christian E Salas
author_sort Ana Kinkead
title Couples extrinsic emotion regulation questionnaire: Psychometric validation in a Chilean population.
title_short Couples extrinsic emotion regulation questionnaire: Psychometric validation in a Chilean population.
title_full Couples extrinsic emotion regulation questionnaire: Psychometric validation in a Chilean population.
title_fullStr Couples extrinsic emotion regulation questionnaire: Psychometric validation in a Chilean population.
title_full_unstemmed Couples extrinsic emotion regulation questionnaire: Psychometric validation in a Chilean population.
title_sort couples extrinsic emotion regulation questionnaire: psychometric validation in a chilean population.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2021-01-01
description The way couples regulate their emotions affects the quality of their relationship. Despite this, no evidence-based scales of validity and reliability can measure the intention to regulate emotions in the romantic dyad. In order to address this gap, we developed the Couples Extrinsic Emotion Regulation (CEER) questionnaire. First, we adapted the "Others" subscale from the Emotion Regulation of Others and Self questionnaire (EROS) for any close relationship to measure the intention to regulate emotions in couples; second, the psychometric properties of the CEER questionnaire were studied. For the content validity assessment, 23 experts (47.8% of whom worked in social and health psychology and the psychology of emotions, 17.4% in couples' therapy, and 34.8% in social science methodologies) participated. A total of 528 Chileans completed the online CEER questionnaire, the relationship satisfaction scale (RAS) and dyadic adjustment scale (DAS): 27.8% were male, age M = 38.7, SD = 10.05, and time of the relationships M = 11.27, SD = 9.82. The content-based validity study made it possible to determine which items to include in the final version. Two unrelated first-order factors structure of the original test fit (RMSEA = .052, GFI = .97, AGFI = .95; CFI = .99; NFI = .98; and NNFI = .98). The CEER+ and CEER- factors presented adequate internal consistency (α = .79; ω = .80 and α = .85; ω = .85, respectively). The discrimination index of the factors were excellent (CEER+ = .55 and CEER- = .63). Validity evidence based on the relations to other variables showed a direct positive relation between CEER+, RAS and overall DAS, as well as their factors; and a negative relation between CEER-, RAS overall DAS, as well as their factors. The use of this instrument is recommended for the identification of Chilean couples where at least one of the partners has a less favorable opinion of their relationship, providing relevant data for couple's therapy.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252329
work_keys_str_mv AT anakinkead couplesextrinsicemotionregulationquestionnairepsychometricvalidationinachileanpopulation
AT susanasanduvetechaves couplesextrinsicemotionregulationquestionnairepsychometricvalidationinachileanpopulation
AT salvadorchaconmoscoso couplesextrinsicemotionregulationquestionnairepsychometricvalidationinachileanpopulation
AT christianesalas couplesextrinsicemotionregulationquestionnairepsychometricvalidationinachileanpopulation
_version_ 1721372094001840128