The Polar Silk Road: China’s Multilevel Arctic Strategy to Globalize the Far North

China has become an eminent Arctic actor in recent years due to its resource investments and bilateral diplomacies towards Russia and the Nordics. However, its arrival in the Arctic also aroused suspicion in foreign media and politics, which are distressed about China’s goals in the Far North and th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Reinhard Biedermann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: National Sun Yat-sen University 2020-09-01
Series:Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: An International Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://icaps.nsysu.edu.tw/var/file/131/1131/img/CCPS6(2)-Biedermann.pdf
id doaj-35371b75792a4264aa9e0f1444a7a62e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-35371b75792a4264aa9e0f1444a7a62e2021-03-19T02:50:23ZengNational Sun Yat-sen UniversityContemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: An International Journal2410-96812410-96812020-09-0162571615The Polar Silk Road: China’s Multilevel Arctic Strategy to Globalize the Far NorthReinhard Biedermann0Tamkang University, TaiwanChina has become an eminent Arctic actor in recent years due to its resource investments and bilateral diplomacies towards Russia and the Nordics. However, its arrival in the Arctic also aroused suspicion in foreign media and politics, which are distressed about China’s goals in the Far North and the Belt and Road Initiative in general. This article assumes that the precondition for an effective and welcome Arctic diplomacy is how China manages and approaches the different levels and actors involved in Arctic governance. It argues that it is the small but wealthy European Arctic states that are indispensable for China to increase and accommodate its Arctic status and to complete the announced Polar Silk Road (PSR) in the years to come. Russia is mainly a conduit for China in connecting the PSR with Western Europe. However, Beijing’s primary interests lie in robust and cooperative bilateral relations with the Arctic European states, enabling it to flexibly react to future external developments and opportunities, to promote the globalisation of, and China’s access to, the Arctic. Hence the Nordic societies should be aware that China’s Arctic rise may also entail severe environmental costs in the fragile Arctic environment. The article concludes that China has adapted to the Arctic governance system peacefully so far, although this system needs to react flexibly to the new challenges that arise.https://icaps.nsysu.edu.tw/var/file/131/1131/img/CCPS6(2)-Biedermann.pdfbarentsinternational political economyforeign policymultilevel governanceresourcesbelt and road initiative
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Reinhard Biedermann
spellingShingle Reinhard Biedermann
The Polar Silk Road: China’s Multilevel Arctic Strategy to Globalize the Far North
Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: An International Journal
barents
international political economy
foreign policy
multilevel governance
resources
belt and road initiative
author_facet Reinhard Biedermann
author_sort Reinhard Biedermann
title The Polar Silk Road: China’s Multilevel Arctic Strategy to Globalize the Far North
title_short The Polar Silk Road: China’s Multilevel Arctic Strategy to Globalize the Far North
title_full The Polar Silk Road: China’s Multilevel Arctic Strategy to Globalize the Far North
title_fullStr The Polar Silk Road: China’s Multilevel Arctic Strategy to Globalize the Far North
title_full_unstemmed The Polar Silk Road: China’s Multilevel Arctic Strategy to Globalize the Far North
title_sort polar silk road: china’s multilevel arctic strategy to globalize the far north
publisher National Sun Yat-sen University
series Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: An International Journal
issn 2410-9681
2410-9681
publishDate 2020-09-01
description China has become an eminent Arctic actor in recent years due to its resource investments and bilateral diplomacies towards Russia and the Nordics. However, its arrival in the Arctic also aroused suspicion in foreign media and politics, which are distressed about China’s goals in the Far North and the Belt and Road Initiative in general. This article assumes that the precondition for an effective and welcome Arctic diplomacy is how China manages and approaches the different levels and actors involved in Arctic governance. It argues that it is the small but wealthy European Arctic states that are indispensable for China to increase and accommodate its Arctic status and to complete the announced Polar Silk Road (PSR) in the years to come. Russia is mainly a conduit for China in connecting the PSR with Western Europe. However, Beijing’s primary interests lie in robust and cooperative bilateral relations with the Arctic European states, enabling it to flexibly react to future external developments and opportunities, to promote the globalisation of, and China’s access to, the Arctic. Hence the Nordic societies should be aware that China’s Arctic rise may also entail severe environmental costs in the fragile Arctic environment. The article concludes that China has adapted to the Arctic governance system peacefully so far, although this system needs to react flexibly to the new challenges that arise.
topic barents
international political economy
foreign policy
multilevel governance
resources
belt and road initiative
url https://icaps.nsysu.edu.tw/var/file/131/1131/img/CCPS6(2)-Biedermann.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT reinhardbiedermann thepolarsilkroadchinasmultilevelarcticstrategytoglobalizethefarnorth
AT reinhardbiedermann polarsilkroadchinasmultilevelarcticstrategytoglobalizethefarnorth
_version_ 1724214690178924544