Long-term biases in geomagnetic <i>K</i> and <i>aa</i> indices

Analysis is made of the geomagnetic-activity <i>aa</i> index and its source <i>K</i>-index data from groups of ground-based observatories in Britain, and Australia, 1868.0–2009.0, solar cycles 11–23. The <i>K</i> data show persistent biases, especially for high...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: J. J. Love
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2011-08-01
Series:Annales Geophysicae
Online Access:https://www.ann-geophys.net/29/1365/2011/angeo-29-1365-2011.pdf
id doaj-351ec4b25dea4b4cbd1c2e152ce4c303
record_format Article
spelling doaj-351ec4b25dea4b4cbd1c2e152ce4c3032020-11-24T23:24:00ZengCopernicus PublicationsAnnales Geophysicae0992-76891432-05762011-08-01291365137510.5194/angeo-29-1365-2011Long-term biases in geomagnetic <i>K</i> and <i>aa</i> indicesJ. J. Love0Geomagnetism Program, US Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado, USAAnalysis is made of the geomagnetic-activity <i>aa</i> index and its source <i>K</i>-index data from groups of ground-based observatories in Britain, and Australia, 1868.0–2009.0, solar cycles 11–23. The <i>K</i> data show persistent biases, especially for high (low) <i>K</i>-activity levels at British (Australian) observatories. From examination of multiple subsets of the <i>K</i> data we infer that the biases are not predominantly the result of changes in observatory location, localized induced magnetotelluric currents, changes in magnetometer technology, or the modernization of <i>K</i>-value estimation methods. Instead, the biases appear to be artifacts of the latitude-dependent scaling used to assign <i>K</i> values to particular local levels of geomagnetic activity. The biases are not effectively removed by weighting factors used to estimate <i>aa</i>. We show that long-term averages of the <i>aa</i> index, such as annual averages, are dominated by medium-level geomagnetic activity levels having <i>K</i> values of 3 and 4.https://www.ann-geophys.net/29/1365/2011/angeo-29-1365-2011.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. J. Love
spellingShingle J. J. Love
Long-term biases in geomagnetic <i>K</i> and <i>aa</i> indices
Annales Geophysicae
author_facet J. J. Love
author_sort J. J. Love
title Long-term biases in geomagnetic <i>K</i> and <i>aa</i> indices
title_short Long-term biases in geomagnetic <i>K</i> and <i>aa</i> indices
title_full Long-term biases in geomagnetic <i>K</i> and <i>aa</i> indices
title_fullStr Long-term biases in geomagnetic <i>K</i> and <i>aa</i> indices
title_full_unstemmed Long-term biases in geomagnetic <i>K</i> and <i>aa</i> indices
title_sort long-term biases in geomagnetic <i>k</i> and <i>aa</i> indices
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Annales Geophysicae
issn 0992-7689
1432-0576
publishDate 2011-08-01
description Analysis is made of the geomagnetic-activity <i>aa</i> index and its source <i>K</i>-index data from groups of ground-based observatories in Britain, and Australia, 1868.0–2009.0, solar cycles 11–23. The <i>K</i> data show persistent biases, especially for high (low) <i>K</i>-activity levels at British (Australian) observatories. From examination of multiple subsets of the <i>K</i> data we infer that the biases are not predominantly the result of changes in observatory location, localized induced magnetotelluric currents, changes in magnetometer technology, or the modernization of <i>K</i>-value estimation methods. Instead, the biases appear to be artifacts of the latitude-dependent scaling used to assign <i>K</i> values to particular local levels of geomagnetic activity. The biases are not effectively removed by weighting factors used to estimate <i>aa</i>. We show that long-term averages of the <i>aa</i> index, such as annual averages, are dominated by medium-level geomagnetic activity levels having <i>K</i> values of 3 and 4.
url https://www.ann-geophys.net/29/1365/2011/angeo-29-1365-2011.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jjlove longtermbiasesingeomagneticikiandiaaiindices
_version_ 1725562464238567424