Preparation of Synthesis Gas from CO<sub>2</sub> for Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis—Comparison of Alternative Process Configurations

We compare different approaches for the preparation of carbon monoxide-rich synthesis gas (syngas) for Fischer–Tropsch (FT) synthesis from carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) using a self-consistent design and process simulation framework. Three alternative methods for suppling heat to the s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ilkka Hannula, Noora Kaisalo, Pekka Simell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-09-01
Series:C
Subjects:
CCU
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5629/6/3/55
id doaj-3508255b10d74c81bdf7beb3db01d631
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3508255b10d74c81bdf7beb3db01d6312020-11-25T02:30:08ZengMDPI AGC2311-56292020-09-016555510.3390/c6030055Preparation of Synthesis Gas from CO<sub>2</sub> for Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis—Comparison of Alternative Process ConfigurationsIlkka Hannula0Noora Kaisalo1Pekka Simell2VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., P.O. Box 1000, FI-02044 VTT Espoo, FinlandVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., P.O. Box 1000, FI-02044 VTT Espoo, FinlandVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., P.O. Box 1000, FI-02044 VTT Espoo, FinlandWe compare different approaches for the preparation of carbon monoxide-rich synthesis gas (syngas) for Fischer–Tropsch (FT) synthesis from carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) using a self-consistent design and process simulation framework. Three alternative methods for suppling heat to the syngas preparation step are investigated, namely: allothermal from combustion (COMB), autothermal from partial oxidation (POX) and autothermal from electric resistance (ER) heating. In addition, two alternative design approaches for the syngas preparation step are investigated, namely: once-through (OT) and recycle (RC). The combination of these alternatives gives six basic configurations, each characterized by distinctive plant designs that have been individually modelled and analyzed. Carbon efficiencies (from CO<sub>2</sub> to FT syncrude) are 50–55% for the OT designs and 65–89% for the RC designs, depending on the heat supply method. Thermal efficiencies (from electricity to FT syncrude) are 33–41% for configurations when using low temperature electrolyzer, and 48–59% when using high temperature electrolyzer. Of the RC designs, both the highest carbon efficiency and thermal efficiency was observed for the ER configuration, followed by POX and COMB configurations.https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5629/6/3/55CCUCO<sub>2</sub> utilizationelectrofuelspower-to-fuelssynfuelsreforming
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ilkka Hannula
Noora Kaisalo
Pekka Simell
spellingShingle Ilkka Hannula
Noora Kaisalo
Pekka Simell
Preparation of Synthesis Gas from CO<sub>2</sub> for Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis—Comparison of Alternative Process Configurations
C
CCU
CO<sub>2</sub> utilization
electrofuels
power-to-fuels
synfuels
reforming
author_facet Ilkka Hannula
Noora Kaisalo
Pekka Simell
author_sort Ilkka Hannula
title Preparation of Synthesis Gas from CO<sub>2</sub> for Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis—Comparison of Alternative Process Configurations
title_short Preparation of Synthesis Gas from CO<sub>2</sub> for Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis—Comparison of Alternative Process Configurations
title_full Preparation of Synthesis Gas from CO<sub>2</sub> for Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis—Comparison of Alternative Process Configurations
title_fullStr Preparation of Synthesis Gas from CO<sub>2</sub> for Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis—Comparison of Alternative Process Configurations
title_full_unstemmed Preparation of Synthesis Gas from CO<sub>2</sub> for Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis—Comparison of Alternative Process Configurations
title_sort preparation of synthesis gas from co<sub>2</sub> for fischer–tropsch synthesis—comparison of alternative process configurations
publisher MDPI AG
series C
issn 2311-5629
publishDate 2020-09-01
description We compare different approaches for the preparation of carbon monoxide-rich synthesis gas (syngas) for Fischer–Tropsch (FT) synthesis from carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) using a self-consistent design and process simulation framework. Three alternative methods for suppling heat to the syngas preparation step are investigated, namely: allothermal from combustion (COMB), autothermal from partial oxidation (POX) and autothermal from electric resistance (ER) heating. In addition, two alternative design approaches for the syngas preparation step are investigated, namely: once-through (OT) and recycle (RC). The combination of these alternatives gives six basic configurations, each characterized by distinctive plant designs that have been individually modelled and analyzed. Carbon efficiencies (from CO<sub>2</sub> to FT syncrude) are 50–55% for the OT designs and 65–89% for the RC designs, depending on the heat supply method. Thermal efficiencies (from electricity to FT syncrude) are 33–41% for configurations when using low temperature electrolyzer, and 48–59% when using high temperature electrolyzer. Of the RC designs, both the highest carbon efficiency and thermal efficiency was observed for the ER configuration, followed by POX and COMB configurations.
topic CCU
CO<sub>2</sub> utilization
electrofuels
power-to-fuels
synfuels
reforming
url https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5629/6/3/55
work_keys_str_mv AT ilkkahannula preparationofsynthesisgasfromcosub2subforfischertropschsynthesiscomparisonofalternativeprocessconfigurations
AT noorakaisalo preparationofsynthesisgasfromcosub2subforfischertropschsynthesiscomparisonofalternativeprocessconfigurations
AT pekkasimell preparationofsynthesisgasfromcosub2subforfischertropschsynthesiscomparisonofalternativeprocessconfigurations
_version_ 1724829721785532416