Preparation of Synthesis Gas from CO<sub>2</sub> for Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis—Comparison of Alternative Process Configurations
We compare different approaches for the preparation of carbon monoxide-rich synthesis gas (syngas) for Fischer–Tropsch (FT) synthesis from carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) using a self-consistent design and process simulation framework. Three alternative methods for suppling heat to the s...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-09-01
|
Series: | C |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5629/6/3/55 |
id |
doaj-3508255b10d74c81bdf7beb3db01d631 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3508255b10d74c81bdf7beb3db01d6312020-11-25T02:30:08ZengMDPI AGC2311-56292020-09-016555510.3390/c6030055Preparation of Synthesis Gas from CO<sub>2</sub> for Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis—Comparison of Alternative Process ConfigurationsIlkka Hannula0Noora Kaisalo1Pekka Simell2VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., P.O. Box 1000, FI-02044 VTT Espoo, FinlandVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., P.O. Box 1000, FI-02044 VTT Espoo, FinlandVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., P.O. Box 1000, FI-02044 VTT Espoo, FinlandWe compare different approaches for the preparation of carbon monoxide-rich synthesis gas (syngas) for Fischer–Tropsch (FT) synthesis from carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) using a self-consistent design and process simulation framework. Three alternative methods for suppling heat to the syngas preparation step are investigated, namely: allothermal from combustion (COMB), autothermal from partial oxidation (POX) and autothermal from electric resistance (ER) heating. In addition, two alternative design approaches for the syngas preparation step are investigated, namely: once-through (OT) and recycle (RC). The combination of these alternatives gives six basic configurations, each characterized by distinctive plant designs that have been individually modelled and analyzed. Carbon efficiencies (from CO<sub>2</sub> to FT syncrude) are 50–55% for the OT designs and 65–89% for the RC designs, depending on the heat supply method. Thermal efficiencies (from electricity to FT syncrude) are 33–41% for configurations when using low temperature electrolyzer, and 48–59% when using high temperature electrolyzer. Of the RC designs, both the highest carbon efficiency and thermal efficiency was observed for the ER configuration, followed by POX and COMB configurations.https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5629/6/3/55CCUCO<sub>2</sub> utilizationelectrofuelspower-to-fuelssynfuelsreforming |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ilkka Hannula Noora Kaisalo Pekka Simell |
spellingShingle |
Ilkka Hannula Noora Kaisalo Pekka Simell Preparation of Synthesis Gas from CO<sub>2</sub> for Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis—Comparison of Alternative Process Configurations C CCU CO<sub>2</sub> utilization electrofuels power-to-fuels synfuels reforming |
author_facet |
Ilkka Hannula Noora Kaisalo Pekka Simell |
author_sort |
Ilkka Hannula |
title |
Preparation of Synthesis Gas from CO<sub>2</sub> for Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis—Comparison of Alternative Process Configurations |
title_short |
Preparation of Synthesis Gas from CO<sub>2</sub> for Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis—Comparison of Alternative Process Configurations |
title_full |
Preparation of Synthesis Gas from CO<sub>2</sub> for Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis—Comparison of Alternative Process Configurations |
title_fullStr |
Preparation of Synthesis Gas from CO<sub>2</sub> for Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis—Comparison of Alternative Process Configurations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Preparation of Synthesis Gas from CO<sub>2</sub> for Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis—Comparison of Alternative Process Configurations |
title_sort |
preparation of synthesis gas from co<sub>2</sub> for fischer–tropsch synthesis—comparison of alternative process configurations |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
C |
issn |
2311-5629 |
publishDate |
2020-09-01 |
description |
We compare different approaches for the preparation of carbon monoxide-rich synthesis gas (syngas) for Fischer–Tropsch (FT) synthesis from carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) using a self-consistent design and process simulation framework. Three alternative methods for suppling heat to the syngas preparation step are investigated, namely: allothermal from combustion (COMB), autothermal from partial oxidation (POX) and autothermal from electric resistance (ER) heating. In addition, two alternative design approaches for the syngas preparation step are investigated, namely: once-through (OT) and recycle (RC). The combination of these alternatives gives six basic configurations, each characterized by distinctive plant designs that have been individually modelled and analyzed. Carbon efficiencies (from CO<sub>2</sub> to FT syncrude) are 50–55% for the OT designs and 65–89% for the RC designs, depending on the heat supply method. Thermal efficiencies (from electricity to FT syncrude) are 33–41% for configurations when using low temperature electrolyzer, and 48–59% when using high temperature electrolyzer. Of the RC designs, both the highest carbon efficiency and thermal efficiency was observed for the ER configuration, followed by POX and COMB configurations. |
topic |
CCU CO<sub>2</sub> utilization electrofuels power-to-fuels synfuels reforming |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5629/6/3/55 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ilkkahannula preparationofsynthesisgasfromcosub2subforfischertropschsynthesiscomparisonofalternativeprocessconfigurations AT noorakaisalo preparationofsynthesisgasfromcosub2subforfischertropschsynthesiscomparisonofalternativeprocessconfigurations AT pekkasimell preparationofsynthesisgasfromcosub2subforfischertropschsynthesiscomparisonofalternativeprocessconfigurations |
_version_ |
1724829721785532416 |