Needle acquisition patterns, network risk and social capital among rural PWID in Puerto Rico

Abstract Background People who inject drugs (PWID) take on significant risks of contracting blood-borne infection, including injecting with a large number of partners and acquiring needles from unsafe sources. When combined, risk of infection can be magnified. Methods Using a sample of PWID in rural...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ian Duncan, Patrick Habecker, Roberto Abadie, Ric Curtis, Bilal Khan, Kirk Dombrowski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-10-01
Series:Harm Reduction Journal
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12954-017-0195-5
id doaj-34fa0a6126e04fdca849fd9b7e9f2681
record_format Article
spelling doaj-34fa0a6126e04fdca849fd9b7e9f26812020-11-25T00:40:52ZengBMCHarm Reduction Journal1477-75172017-10-0114111110.1186/s12954-017-0195-5Needle acquisition patterns, network risk and social capital among rural PWID in Puerto RicoIan Duncan0Patrick Habecker1Roberto Abadie2Ric Curtis3Bilal Khan4Kirk Dombrowski5University of NebraskaUniversity of NebraskaUniversity of NebraskaJohn Jay College of Criminal JusticeUniversity of NebraskaUniversity of NebraskaAbstract Background People who inject drugs (PWID) take on significant risks of contracting blood-borne infection, including injecting with a large number of partners and acquiring needles from unsafe sources. When combined, risk of infection can be magnified. Methods Using a sample of PWID in rural Puerto Rico, we model the relationship between a subject’s number of injection partners and the likelihood of having used an unsafe source of injection syringes. Data collection with 315 current injectors identified six sources of needles. Results Of the six possible sources, only acquisition from a seller (paid or free), or using syringes found on the street, was significantly related to number of partners. Conclusions These results suggest that sources of syringes do serve to multiply risk of infection caused by multi-partner injection concurrency. They also suggest that prior research on distinct forms of social capital among PWID may need to be rethought.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12954-017-0195-5
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ian Duncan
Patrick Habecker
Roberto Abadie
Ric Curtis
Bilal Khan
Kirk Dombrowski
spellingShingle Ian Duncan
Patrick Habecker
Roberto Abadie
Ric Curtis
Bilal Khan
Kirk Dombrowski
Needle acquisition patterns, network risk and social capital among rural PWID in Puerto Rico
Harm Reduction Journal
author_facet Ian Duncan
Patrick Habecker
Roberto Abadie
Ric Curtis
Bilal Khan
Kirk Dombrowski
author_sort Ian Duncan
title Needle acquisition patterns, network risk and social capital among rural PWID in Puerto Rico
title_short Needle acquisition patterns, network risk and social capital among rural PWID in Puerto Rico
title_full Needle acquisition patterns, network risk and social capital among rural PWID in Puerto Rico
title_fullStr Needle acquisition patterns, network risk and social capital among rural PWID in Puerto Rico
title_full_unstemmed Needle acquisition patterns, network risk and social capital among rural PWID in Puerto Rico
title_sort needle acquisition patterns, network risk and social capital among rural pwid in puerto rico
publisher BMC
series Harm Reduction Journal
issn 1477-7517
publishDate 2017-10-01
description Abstract Background People who inject drugs (PWID) take on significant risks of contracting blood-borne infection, including injecting with a large number of partners and acquiring needles from unsafe sources. When combined, risk of infection can be magnified. Methods Using a sample of PWID in rural Puerto Rico, we model the relationship between a subject’s number of injection partners and the likelihood of having used an unsafe source of injection syringes. Data collection with 315 current injectors identified six sources of needles. Results Of the six possible sources, only acquisition from a seller (paid or free), or using syringes found on the street, was significantly related to number of partners. Conclusions These results suggest that sources of syringes do serve to multiply risk of infection caused by multi-partner injection concurrency. They also suggest that prior research on distinct forms of social capital among PWID may need to be rethought.
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12954-017-0195-5
work_keys_str_mv AT ianduncan needleacquisitionpatternsnetworkriskandsocialcapitalamongruralpwidinpuertorico
AT patrickhabecker needleacquisitionpatternsnetworkriskandsocialcapitalamongruralpwidinpuertorico
AT robertoabadie needleacquisitionpatternsnetworkriskandsocialcapitalamongruralpwidinpuertorico
AT riccurtis needleacquisitionpatternsnetworkriskandsocialcapitalamongruralpwidinpuertorico
AT bilalkhan needleacquisitionpatternsnetworkriskandsocialcapitalamongruralpwidinpuertorico
AT kirkdombrowski needleacquisitionpatternsnetworkriskandsocialcapitalamongruralpwidinpuertorico
_version_ 1725288346953973760