Maritime Transport in a Life Cycle Perspective: How Fuels, Vessel Types, and Operational Profiles Influence Energy Demand and Greenhouse Gas Emissions

A “Well-to-Propeller” Life Cycle Assessment of maritime transport was performed with a European geographical focus. Four typical types of vessels with specific operational profiles were assessed: a container vessel and a tanker (both with 2-stroke engines), a passenger roll-on/roll-off (Ro-Pax) and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Grusche J. Seithe, Alexandra Bonou, Dimitrios Giannopoulos, Chariklia A. Georgopoulou, Maria Founti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-05-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/11/2739
id doaj-34f8e5c84df247aabc155c3c61e1c05e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-34f8e5c84df247aabc155c3c61e1c05e2020-11-25T03:20:35ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732020-05-01132739273910.3390/en13112739Maritime Transport in a Life Cycle Perspective: How Fuels, Vessel Types, and Operational Profiles Influence Energy Demand and Greenhouse Gas EmissionsGrusche J. Seithe0Alexandra Bonou1Dimitrios Giannopoulos2Chariklia A. Georgopoulou3Maria Founti4DNV-GL Group Technology and Research, Maritime Transport,Veritasveien 1, 1363 Høvik, NorwayLaboratory Of Heterogeneous Mixtures and Combustion Systems, School of Mechanical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Polytechnioupoli-Zografou Heroon Polytechniou, 9-15780 Athens, GreeceLaboratory Of Heterogeneous Mixtures and Combustion Systems, School of Mechanical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Polytechnioupoli-Zografou Heroon Polytechniou, 9-15780 Athens, GreeceDNV-GL Maritime R&D and Advisory, South East Europe and Middle East, 5 Aitolikou Str., 18545 Piraeus, GreeceLaboratory Of Heterogeneous Mixtures and Combustion Systems, School of Mechanical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Polytechnioupoli-Zografou Heroon Polytechniou, 9-15780 Athens, GreeceA “Well-to-Propeller” Life Cycle Assessment of maritime transport was performed with a European geographical focus. Four typical types of vessels with specific operational profiles were assessed: a container vessel and a tanker (both with 2-stroke engines), a passenger roll-on/roll-off (Ro-Pax) and a cruise vessel (both with 4-stroke engines). All main engines were dual fuel operated with Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO) or Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG). Alternative onshore and offshore fuel supply chains were considered. Primary energy use and greenhouse gas emissions were assessed. Raw material extraction was found to be the most impactful life cycle stage (~90% of total energy use). Regarding greenhouse gases, liquefaction was the key issue. When transitioning from HFO to LNG, the systems were mainly influenced by a reduction in cargo capacity due to bunkering requirements and methane slip, which depends on the fuel supply chain (onshore has 64% more slip than offshore) and the engine type (4-stroke engines have 20% more slip than 2-stroke engines). The combination of alternative fuel supply chains and specific operational profiles allowed for a complete system assessment. The results demonstrated that multiple opposing drivers affect the environmental performance of maritime transport, a useful insight towards establishing emission abatement strategies.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/11/2739Life Cycle AssessmentGreen House GasesEnergy UseSustainable TransportLiquefied Natural GasHeavy Fuel Oil
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Grusche J. Seithe
Alexandra Bonou
Dimitrios Giannopoulos
Chariklia A. Georgopoulou
Maria Founti
spellingShingle Grusche J. Seithe
Alexandra Bonou
Dimitrios Giannopoulos
Chariklia A. Georgopoulou
Maria Founti
Maritime Transport in a Life Cycle Perspective: How Fuels, Vessel Types, and Operational Profiles Influence Energy Demand and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Energies
Life Cycle Assessment
Green House Gases
Energy Use
Sustainable Transport
Liquefied Natural Gas
Heavy Fuel Oil
author_facet Grusche J. Seithe
Alexandra Bonou
Dimitrios Giannopoulos
Chariklia A. Georgopoulou
Maria Founti
author_sort Grusche J. Seithe
title Maritime Transport in a Life Cycle Perspective: How Fuels, Vessel Types, and Operational Profiles Influence Energy Demand and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
title_short Maritime Transport in a Life Cycle Perspective: How Fuels, Vessel Types, and Operational Profiles Influence Energy Demand and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
title_full Maritime Transport in a Life Cycle Perspective: How Fuels, Vessel Types, and Operational Profiles Influence Energy Demand and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
title_fullStr Maritime Transport in a Life Cycle Perspective: How Fuels, Vessel Types, and Operational Profiles Influence Energy Demand and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
title_full_unstemmed Maritime Transport in a Life Cycle Perspective: How Fuels, Vessel Types, and Operational Profiles Influence Energy Demand and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
title_sort maritime transport in a life cycle perspective: how fuels, vessel types, and operational profiles influence energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions
publisher MDPI AG
series Energies
issn 1996-1073
publishDate 2020-05-01
description A “Well-to-Propeller” Life Cycle Assessment of maritime transport was performed with a European geographical focus. Four typical types of vessels with specific operational profiles were assessed: a container vessel and a tanker (both with 2-stroke engines), a passenger roll-on/roll-off (Ro-Pax) and a cruise vessel (both with 4-stroke engines). All main engines were dual fuel operated with Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO) or Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG). Alternative onshore and offshore fuel supply chains were considered. Primary energy use and greenhouse gas emissions were assessed. Raw material extraction was found to be the most impactful life cycle stage (~90% of total energy use). Regarding greenhouse gases, liquefaction was the key issue. When transitioning from HFO to LNG, the systems were mainly influenced by a reduction in cargo capacity due to bunkering requirements and methane slip, which depends on the fuel supply chain (onshore has 64% more slip than offshore) and the engine type (4-stroke engines have 20% more slip than 2-stroke engines). The combination of alternative fuel supply chains and specific operational profiles allowed for a complete system assessment. The results demonstrated that multiple opposing drivers affect the environmental performance of maritime transport, a useful insight towards establishing emission abatement strategies.
topic Life Cycle Assessment
Green House Gases
Energy Use
Sustainable Transport
Liquefied Natural Gas
Heavy Fuel Oil
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/11/2739
work_keys_str_mv AT gruschejseithe maritimetransportinalifecycleperspectivehowfuelsvesseltypesandoperationalprofilesinfluenceenergydemandandgreenhousegasemissions
AT alexandrabonou maritimetransportinalifecycleperspectivehowfuelsvesseltypesandoperationalprofilesinfluenceenergydemandandgreenhousegasemissions
AT dimitriosgiannopoulos maritimetransportinalifecycleperspectivehowfuelsvesseltypesandoperationalprofilesinfluenceenergydemandandgreenhousegasemissions
AT charikliaageorgopoulou maritimetransportinalifecycleperspectivehowfuelsvesseltypesandoperationalprofilesinfluenceenergydemandandgreenhousegasemissions
AT mariafounti maritimetransportinalifecycleperspectivehowfuelsvesseltypesandoperationalprofilesinfluenceenergydemandandgreenhousegasemissions
_version_ 1724617891841572864