Rangelands: Where Anthromes Meet Their Limits

Defining rangelands as anthromes enabled Ellis and Ramankutty (2008) to conclude that more than three-quarters of Earth’s land is anthropogenic; without rangelands, this figure would have been less than half. They classified all lands grazed by domestic livestock as rangelands, provided that human p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nathan F. Sayre, Diana K. Davis, Brandon Bestelmeyer, Jeb C. Williamson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-05-01
Series:Land
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/6/2/31
id doaj-34ebb7e65eb348f586e7128f8d5c28db
record_format Article
spelling doaj-34ebb7e65eb348f586e7128f8d5c28db2020-11-24T21:59:03ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2017-05-01623110.3390/land6020031land6020031Rangelands: Where Anthromes Meet Their LimitsNathan F. Sayre0Diana K. Davis1Brandon Bestelmeyer2Jeb C. Williamson3Department of Geography, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USADepartment of History, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USAUSDA-ARS-Jornada Experimental Range, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USAUSDA-ARS-Jornada Experimental Range, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USADefining rangelands as anthromes enabled Ellis and Ramankutty (2008) to conclude that more than three-quarters of Earth’s land is anthropogenic; without rangelands, this figure would have been less than half. They classified all lands grazed by domestic livestock as rangelands, provided that human population densities were low; similar areas without livestock were excluded and classified instead as ‘wildlands’. This paper examines the empirical basis and conceptual assumptions of defining and categorizing rangelands in this fashion. Empirically, we conclude that a large proportion of rangelands, although used to varying degrees by domesticated livestock, are not altered significantly by this use, especially in arid, highly variable environments and in settings with long evolutionary histories of herbivory by wild animals. Even where changes have occurred, the dynamics and components of many rangelands remain structurally and functionally equivalent to those that preceded domestic livestock grazing or would be found in its absence. In much of Africa and Asia, grazing is so longstanding as to be inextricable from ‘natural’ or reference conditions for those sites. Thus, the extent of anthropogenic biomes is significantly overstated. Conceptually, rangelands reveal the dependence of the anthromes thesis on outdated assumptions of ecological climax and equilibrium. Coming to terms with rangelands—how they can be classified, understood, and managed sustainably—thus offers important lessons for understanding anthromes and the Anthropocene as a whole. At the root of these lessons, we argue, is not the question of human impacts on ecosystems but property relations among humans.http://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/6/2/31pastoralismgrazing landsdrylandslivestock grazingnon-equilibrium ecologydesertificationvariability
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nathan F. Sayre
Diana K. Davis
Brandon Bestelmeyer
Jeb C. Williamson
spellingShingle Nathan F. Sayre
Diana K. Davis
Brandon Bestelmeyer
Jeb C. Williamson
Rangelands: Where Anthromes Meet Their Limits
Land
pastoralism
grazing lands
drylands
livestock grazing
non-equilibrium ecology
desertification
variability
author_facet Nathan F. Sayre
Diana K. Davis
Brandon Bestelmeyer
Jeb C. Williamson
author_sort Nathan F. Sayre
title Rangelands: Where Anthromes Meet Their Limits
title_short Rangelands: Where Anthromes Meet Their Limits
title_full Rangelands: Where Anthromes Meet Their Limits
title_fullStr Rangelands: Where Anthromes Meet Their Limits
title_full_unstemmed Rangelands: Where Anthromes Meet Their Limits
title_sort rangelands: where anthromes meet their limits
publisher MDPI AG
series Land
issn 2073-445X
publishDate 2017-05-01
description Defining rangelands as anthromes enabled Ellis and Ramankutty (2008) to conclude that more than three-quarters of Earth’s land is anthropogenic; without rangelands, this figure would have been less than half. They classified all lands grazed by domestic livestock as rangelands, provided that human population densities were low; similar areas without livestock were excluded and classified instead as ‘wildlands’. This paper examines the empirical basis and conceptual assumptions of defining and categorizing rangelands in this fashion. Empirically, we conclude that a large proportion of rangelands, although used to varying degrees by domesticated livestock, are not altered significantly by this use, especially in arid, highly variable environments and in settings with long evolutionary histories of herbivory by wild animals. Even where changes have occurred, the dynamics and components of many rangelands remain structurally and functionally equivalent to those that preceded domestic livestock grazing or would be found in its absence. In much of Africa and Asia, grazing is so longstanding as to be inextricable from ‘natural’ or reference conditions for those sites. Thus, the extent of anthropogenic biomes is significantly overstated. Conceptually, rangelands reveal the dependence of the anthromes thesis on outdated assumptions of ecological climax and equilibrium. Coming to terms with rangelands—how they can be classified, understood, and managed sustainably—thus offers important lessons for understanding anthromes and the Anthropocene as a whole. At the root of these lessons, we argue, is not the question of human impacts on ecosystems but property relations among humans.
topic pastoralism
grazing lands
drylands
livestock grazing
non-equilibrium ecology
desertification
variability
url http://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/6/2/31
work_keys_str_mv AT nathanfsayre rangelandswhereanthromesmeettheirlimits
AT dianakdavis rangelandswhereanthromesmeettheirlimits
AT brandonbestelmeyer rangelandswhereanthromesmeettheirlimits
AT jebcwilliamson rangelandswhereanthromesmeettheirlimits
_version_ 1725849458655100928