Field Test and Numerical Studies on Influences of PVD Spacing on Vacuum Treatment Effects of Dredged Slurry

A field test was conducted on vacuum treatment effects of a dredged slurry ground considering three PVD spacing, i.e., 700, 800, and 900 mm. The settlement and the pore water pressure dissipation were measured during the treatment period. As expected, the consolidation rate associated with closer PV...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yanming Yu, Junhui Sheng, Li Shi, Zhijun Hu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2021-01-01
Series:Advances in Civil Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9955857
id doaj-34d0138d797b4324afc8c855c1325eaa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-34d0138d797b4324afc8c855c1325eaa2021-07-05T00:01:43ZengHindawi LimitedAdvances in Civil Engineering1687-80942021-01-01202110.1155/2021/9955857Field Test and Numerical Studies on Influences of PVD Spacing on Vacuum Treatment Effects of Dredged SlurryYanming Yu0Junhui Sheng1Li Shi2Zhijun Hu3PowerChina Huadong Engineering Corporation LimitedCollege of Civil EngineeringCollege of Civil EngineeringPowerChina Huadong Engineering Corporation LimitedA field test was conducted on vacuum treatment effects of a dredged slurry ground considering three PVD spacing, i.e., 700, 800, and 900 mm. The settlement and the pore water pressure dissipation were measured during the treatment period. As expected, the consolidation rate associated with closer PVD spacing case is higher than that of the larger spacing case. However, it is observed that the final and stable values of the settlement and the pore pressure dissipation of the close spacing case (e.g., 700 mm) are about 17% higher than the case of larger PVD spacing (e.g., 900 mm). The differences imply that enlarging the PVD spacing not only impedes the consolidation rate but also decreases the vacuum pressure in slurry. Numerical models incorporating the vacuum pressure attenuation effect and the clogging effect were established to reproduce the vacuum treatment process under the three PVD spacing. Good comparisons between the numerical and test results can be obtained given a proper account of vacuum attenuation and the clogging effect along the PVD depth. The comparison clarifies that, for vacuum treatment of slurry ground, the PVD spacing should be determined by due considerations both on the desired consolidation rate and on the pore water pressure that needs to be dissipated.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9955857
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yanming Yu
Junhui Sheng
Li Shi
Zhijun Hu
spellingShingle Yanming Yu
Junhui Sheng
Li Shi
Zhijun Hu
Field Test and Numerical Studies on Influences of PVD Spacing on Vacuum Treatment Effects of Dredged Slurry
Advances in Civil Engineering
author_facet Yanming Yu
Junhui Sheng
Li Shi
Zhijun Hu
author_sort Yanming Yu
title Field Test and Numerical Studies on Influences of PVD Spacing on Vacuum Treatment Effects of Dredged Slurry
title_short Field Test and Numerical Studies on Influences of PVD Spacing on Vacuum Treatment Effects of Dredged Slurry
title_full Field Test and Numerical Studies on Influences of PVD Spacing on Vacuum Treatment Effects of Dredged Slurry
title_fullStr Field Test and Numerical Studies on Influences of PVD Spacing on Vacuum Treatment Effects of Dredged Slurry
title_full_unstemmed Field Test and Numerical Studies on Influences of PVD Spacing on Vacuum Treatment Effects of Dredged Slurry
title_sort field test and numerical studies on influences of pvd spacing on vacuum treatment effects of dredged slurry
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Advances in Civil Engineering
issn 1687-8094
publishDate 2021-01-01
description A field test was conducted on vacuum treatment effects of a dredged slurry ground considering three PVD spacing, i.e., 700, 800, and 900 mm. The settlement and the pore water pressure dissipation were measured during the treatment period. As expected, the consolidation rate associated with closer PVD spacing case is higher than that of the larger spacing case. However, it is observed that the final and stable values of the settlement and the pore pressure dissipation of the close spacing case (e.g., 700 mm) are about 17% higher than the case of larger PVD spacing (e.g., 900 mm). The differences imply that enlarging the PVD spacing not only impedes the consolidation rate but also decreases the vacuum pressure in slurry. Numerical models incorporating the vacuum pressure attenuation effect and the clogging effect were established to reproduce the vacuum treatment process under the three PVD spacing. Good comparisons between the numerical and test results can be obtained given a proper account of vacuum attenuation and the clogging effect along the PVD depth. The comparison clarifies that, for vacuum treatment of slurry ground, the PVD spacing should be determined by due considerations both on the desired consolidation rate and on the pore water pressure that needs to be dissipated.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9955857
work_keys_str_mv AT yanmingyu fieldtestandnumericalstudiesoninfluencesofpvdspacingonvacuumtreatmenteffectsofdredgedslurry
AT junhuisheng fieldtestandnumericalstudiesoninfluencesofpvdspacingonvacuumtreatmenteffectsofdredgedslurry
AT lishi fieldtestandnumericalstudiesoninfluencesofpvdspacingonvacuumtreatmenteffectsofdredgedslurry
AT zhijunhu fieldtestandnumericalstudiesoninfluencesofpvdspacingonvacuumtreatmenteffectsofdredgedslurry
_version_ 1721319460930846720