U.S. Migration and Reproductive Health among Mexican Women: Assessing the Evidence for Health Selectivity

Health selectivity posits that individuals who practice preventive health behaviors are more likely to migrate to the United States, and this has been proposed as one explanation of the Latino Paradox. This paper examines evidence for health selection in the context of reproductive health using nati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alexandra M. Minnis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institut Veolia Environnement 2010-10-01
Series:Field Actions Science Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/factsreports/523
id doaj-34bd754a121a4a5a91cbfa103f7f2373
record_format Article
spelling doaj-34bd754a121a4a5a91cbfa103f7f23732020-11-24T20:48:14ZengInstitut Veolia EnvironnementField Actions Science Reports1867-139X1867-85212010-10-01U.S. Migration and Reproductive Health among Mexican Women: Assessing the Evidence for Health SelectivityAlexandra M. MinnisHealth selectivity posits that individuals who practice preventive health behaviors are more likely to migrate to the United States, and this has been proposed as one explanation of the Latino Paradox. This paper examines evidence for health selection in the context of reproductive health using national survey data from Mexico (the longitudinal Mexico Family Life Survey [MxFLS], 2002 and 2005 waves) and the United States (the National Survey of Family Growth [NSFG], 2002). We compared sexual behaviors and contraceptive practices of Mexican women residing in Mexico who subsequently migrated to the United States with those who remained in Mexico and with Mexican immigrants in the United States. MxFLS respondents who migrated to the United States had a younger mean age, and a larger proportion had no children compared to MxFLS nonmigrants. Within the MxFLS sample, a smaller proportion of women who migrated had ever had vaginal sex, though this difference was nonsignificant with adjustment for sociodemographic factors. No sexual behavior or contraceptive use measures varied between Mexican migrants and nonmigrants within the MxFLS. The mean lifetime number of sexual partners was lower for MxFLS respondents than for Mexican immigrants in the NSFG. Smaller proportions of MxFLS respondents reported using hormonal methods or condoms relative to NSFG respondents. We found no evidence for health selectivity with regard to sexual behaviors or contraceptive practices, underscoring the importance of continued attention to the factors that influence the adaptation trajectories following U.S. migration.http://journals.openedition.org/factsreports/523contraceptionhealth selectionimmigrant healthLatino ParadoxMexican womensexual risk behaviour
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alexandra M. Minnis
spellingShingle Alexandra M. Minnis
U.S. Migration and Reproductive Health among Mexican Women: Assessing the Evidence for Health Selectivity
Field Actions Science Reports
contraception
health selection
immigrant health
Latino Paradox
Mexican women
sexual risk behaviour
author_facet Alexandra M. Minnis
author_sort Alexandra M. Minnis
title U.S. Migration and Reproductive Health among Mexican Women: Assessing the Evidence for Health Selectivity
title_short U.S. Migration and Reproductive Health among Mexican Women: Assessing the Evidence for Health Selectivity
title_full U.S. Migration and Reproductive Health among Mexican Women: Assessing the Evidence for Health Selectivity
title_fullStr U.S. Migration and Reproductive Health among Mexican Women: Assessing the Evidence for Health Selectivity
title_full_unstemmed U.S. Migration and Reproductive Health among Mexican Women: Assessing the Evidence for Health Selectivity
title_sort u.s. migration and reproductive health among mexican women: assessing the evidence for health selectivity
publisher Institut Veolia Environnement
series Field Actions Science Reports
issn 1867-139X
1867-8521
publishDate 2010-10-01
description Health selectivity posits that individuals who practice preventive health behaviors are more likely to migrate to the United States, and this has been proposed as one explanation of the Latino Paradox. This paper examines evidence for health selection in the context of reproductive health using national survey data from Mexico (the longitudinal Mexico Family Life Survey [MxFLS], 2002 and 2005 waves) and the United States (the National Survey of Family Growth [NSFG], 2002). We compared sexual behaviors and contraceptive practices of Mexican women residing in Mexico who subsequently migrated to the United States with those who remained in Mexico and with Mexican immigrants in the United States. MxFLS respondents who migrated to the United States had a younger mean age, and a larger proportion had no children compared to MxFLS nonmigrants. Within the MxFLS sample, a smaller proportion of women who migrated had ever had vaginal sex, though this difference was nonsignificant with adjustment for sociodemographic factors. No sexual behavior or contraceptive use measures varied between Mexican migrants and nonmigrants within the MxFLS. The mean lifetime number of sexual partners was lower for MxFLS respondents than for Mexican immigrants in the NSFG. Smaller proportions of MxFLS respondents reported using hormonal methods or condoms relative to NSFG respondents. We found no evidence for health selectivity with regard to sexual behaviors or contraceptive practices, underscoring the importance of continued attention to the factors that influence the adaptation trajectories following U.S. migration.
topic contraception
health selection
immigrant health
Latino Paradox
Mexican women
sexual risk behaviour
url http://journals.openedition.org/factsreports/523
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandramminnis usmigrationandreproductivehealthamongmexicanwomenassessingtheevidenceforhealthselectivity
_version_ 1716808556158648320