Characterising the incidence and mode of visceral stent failure after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR)
Background In FEVAR, visceral stents provide continuity and maintain perfusion between the main body of the stent and the respective visceral artery. The aim of this study was to characterise the incidence and mode of visceral stent failure (type Ic endoleak, type IIIa endoleak, stenosis/kink, fract...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2021-04-01
|
Series: | JRSM Cardiovascular Disease |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/20480040211012503 |
id |
doaj-34a73ec6be814d779877db6fd42d84e1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-34a73ec6be814d779877db6fd42d84e12021-05-08T21:33:23ZengSAGE PublishingJRSM Cardiovascular Disease2048-00402021-04-011010.1177/20480040211012503Characterising the incidence and mode of visceral stent failure after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR)Shaneel R PatelIain N RoyRichard G McWilliamsJohn A BrennanSrinivasa R VallabhaneniSimon K NeequayeJonathan D SmoutRobert K FisherBackground In FEVAR, visceral stents provide continuity and maintain perfusion between the main body of the stent and the respective visceral artery. The aim of this study was to characterise the incidence and mode of visceral stent failure (type Ic endoleak, type IIIa endoleak, stenosis/kink, fracture, crush and occlusion) after FEVAR in a large cohort of patients at a high-volume centre. Methods A retrospective review of visceral stents placed during FEVAR over 15 years (February 2003-December 2018) was performed. Kaplan-Meier analyses of freedom from visceral stent-related complications were performed. The outcomes between graft configurations of varying complexity were compared, as were the outcomes of different stent types and different visceral vessels. Results Visceral stent complications occurred in 47/236 patients (19.9%) and 54/653 stents (8.3%). Median follow up was 3.7 years (IQR 1.7–5.3 years). There was no difference in visceral stent complication rate between renal, SMA and coeliac arteries. Visceral stent complications were more frequent in more complex grafts compared to less complex grafts. Visceral stent complications were more frequent in uncovered stents compared to covered stents. Visceral stent-related endoleaks (type Ic and type IIIa) occurred exclusively around renal artery stents. The most common modes of failure with SMA stents were kinking and fracture, whereas with coeliac artery stents it was external crush. Conclusion Visceral stent complications after FEVAR are common and merit continued and close long-term surveillance. The mode of visceral stent failure varies across the vessels in which the stents are located.https://doi.org/10.1177/20480040211012503 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Shaneel R Patel Iain N Roy Richard G McWilliams John A Brennan Srinivasa R Vallabhaneni Simon K Neequaye Jonathan D Smout Robert K Fisher |
spellingShingle |
Shaneel R Patel Iain N Roy Richard G McWilliams John A Brennan Srinivasa R Vallabhaneni Simon K Neequaye Jonathan D Smout Robert K Fisher Characterising the incidence and mode of visceral stent failure after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) JRSM Cardiovascular Disease |
author_facet |
Shaneel R Patel Iain N Roy Richard G McWilliams John A Brennan Srinivasa R Vallabhaneni Simon K Neequaye Jonathan D Smout Robert K Fisher |
author_sort |
Shaneel R Patel |
title |
Characterising the incidence and mode of visceral stent failure after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) |
title_short |
Characterising the incidence and mode of visceral stent failure after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) |
title_full |
Characterising the incidence and mode of visceral stent failure after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) |
title_fullStr |
Characterising the incidence and mode of visceral stent failure after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Characterising the incidence and mode of visceral stent failure after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) |
title_sort |
characterising the incidence and mode of visceral stent failure after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (fevar) |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease |
issn |
2048-0040 |
publishDate |
2021-04-01 |
description |
Background In FEVAR, visceral stents provide continuity and maintain perfusion between the main body of the stent and the respective visceral artery. The aim of this study was to characterise the incidence and mode of visceral stent failure (type Ic endoleak, type IIIa endoleak, stenosis/kink, fracture, crush and occlusion) after FEVAR in a large cohort of patients at a high-volume centre. Methods A retrospective review of visceral stents placed during FEVAR over 15 years (February 2003-December 2018) was performed. Kaplan-Meier analyses of freedom from visceral stent-related complications were performed. The outcomes between graft configurations of varying complexity were compared, as were the outcomes of different stent types and different visceral vessels. Results Visceral stent complications occurred in 47/236 patients (19.9%) and 54/653 stents (8.3%). Median follow up was 3.7 years (IQR 1.7–5.3 years). There was no difference in visceral stent complication rate between renal, SMA and coeliac arteries. Visceral stent complications were more frequent in more complex grafts compared to less complex grafts. Visceral stent complications were more frequent in uncovered stents compared to covered stents. Visceral stent-related endoleaks (type Ic and type IIIa) occurred exclusively around renal artery stents. The most common modes of failure with SMA stents were kinking and fracture, whereas with coeliac artery stents it was external crush. Conclusion Visceral stent complications after FEVAR are common and merit continued and close long-term surveillance. The mode of visceral stent failure varies across the vessels in which the stents are located. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/20480040211012503 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shaneelrpatel characterisingtheincidenceandmodeofvisceralstentfailureafterfenestratedendovascularaneurysmrepairfevar AT iainnroy characterisingtheincidenceandmodeofvisceralstentfailureafterfenestratedendovascularaneurysmrepairfevar AT richardgmcwilliams characterisingtheincidenceandmodeofvisceralstentfailureafterfenestratedendovascularaneurysmrepairfevar AT johnabrennan characterisingtheincidenceandmodeofvisceralstentfailureafterfenestratedendovascularaneurysmrepairfevar AT srinivasarvallabhaneni characterisingtheincidenceandmodeofvisceralstentfailureafterfenestratedendovascularaneurysmrepairfevar AT simonkneequaye characterisingtheincidenceandmodeofvisceralstentfailureafterfenestratedendovascularaneurysmrepairfevar AT jonathandsmout characterisingtheincidenceandmodeofvisceralstentfailureafterfenestratedendovascularaneurysmrepairfevar AT robertkfisher characterisingtheincidenceandmodeofvisceralstentfailureafterfenestratedendovascularaneurysmrepairfevar |
_version_ |
1721454910521737216 |