Characterising the incidence and mode of visceral stent failure after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR)

Background In FEVAR, visceral stents provide continuity and maintain perfusion between the main body of the stent and the respective visceral artery. The aim of this study was to characterise the incidence and mode of visceral stent failure (type Ic endoleak, type IIIa endoleak, stenosis/kink, fract...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shaneel R Patel, Iain N Roy, Richard G McWilliams, John A Brennan, Srinivasa R Vallabhaneni, Simon K Neequaye, Jonathan D Smout, Robert K Fisher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-04-01
Series:JRSM Cardiovascular Disease
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/20480040211012503
id doaj-34a73ec6be814d779877db6fd42d84e1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-34a73ec6be814d779877db6fd42d84e12021-05-08T21:33:23ZengSAGE PublishingJRSM Cardiovascular Disease2048-00402021-04-011010.1177/20480040211012503Characterising the incidence and mode of visceral stent failure after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR)Shaneel R PatelIain N RoyRichard G McWilliamsJohn A BrennanSrinivasa R VallabhaneniSimon K NeequayeJonathan D SmoutRobert K FisherBackground In FEVAR, visceral stents provide continuity and maintain perfusion between the main body of the stent and the respective visceral artery. The aim of this study was to characterise the incidence and mode of visceral stent failure (type Ic endoleak, type IIIa endoleak, stenosis/kink, fracture, crush and occlusion) after FEVAR in a large cohort of patients at a high-volume centre. Methods A retrospective review of visceral stents placed during FEVAR over 15 years (February 2003-December 2018) was performed. Kaplan-Meier analyses of freedom from visceral stent-related complications were performed. The outcomes between graft configurations of varying complexity were compared, as were the outcomes of different stent types and different visceral vessels. Results Visceral stent complications occurred in 47/236 patients (19.9%) and 54/653 stents (8.3%). Median follow up was 3.7 years (IQR 1.7–5.3 years). There was no difference in visceral stent complication rate between renal, SMA and coeliac arteries. Visceral stent complications were more frequent in more complex grafts compared to less complex grafts. Visceral stent complications were more frequent in uncovered stents compared to covered stents. Visceral stent-related endoleaks (type Ic and type IIIa) occurred exclusively around renal artery stents. The most common modes of failure with SMA stents were kinking and fracture, whereas with coeliac artery stents it was external crush. Conclusion Visceral stent complications after FEVAR are common and merit continued and close long-term surveillance. The mode of visceral stent failure varies across the vessels in which the stents are located.https://doi.org/10.1177/20480040211012503
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shaneel R Patel
Iain N Roy
Richard G McWilliams
John A Brennan
Srinivasa R Vallabhaneni
Simon K Neequaye
Jonathan D Smout
Robert K Fisher
spellingShingle Shaneel R Patel
Iain N Roy
Richard G McWilliams
John A Brennan
Srinivasa R Vallabhaneni
Simon K Neequaye
Jonathan D Smout
Robert K Fisher
Characterising the incidence and mode of visceral stent failure after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR)
JRSM Cardiovascular Disease
author_facet Shaneel R Patel
Iain N Roy
Richard G McWilliams
John A Brennan
Srinivasa R Vallabhaneni
Simon K Neequaye
Jonathan D Smout
Robert K Fisher
author_sort Shaneel R Patel
title Characterising the incidence and mode of visceral stent failure after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR)
title_short Characterising the incidence and mode of visceral stent failure after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR)
title_full Characterising the incidence and mode of visceral stent failure after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR)
title_fullStr Characterising the incidence and mode of visceral stent failure after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR)
title_full_unstemmed Characterising the incidence and mode of visceral stent failure after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR)
title_sort characterising the incidence and mode of visceral stent failure after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (fevar)
publisher SAGE Publishing
series JRSM Cardiovascular Disease
issn 2048-0040
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Background In FEVAR, visceral stents provide continuity and maintain perfusion between the main body of the stent and the respective visceral artery. The aim of this study was to characterise the incidence and mode of visceral stent failure (type Ic endoleak, type IIIa endoleak, stenosis/kink, fracture, crush and occlusion) after FEVAR in a large cohort of patients at a high-volume centre. Methods A retrospective review of visceral stents placed during FEVAR over 15 years (February 2003-December 2018) was performed. Kaplan-Meier analyses of freedom from visceral stent-related complications were performed. The outcomes between graft configurations of varying complexity were compared, as were the outcomes of different stent types and different visceral vessels. Results Visceral stent complications occurred in 47/236 patients (19.9%) and 54/653 stents (8.3%). Median follow up was 3.7 years (IQR 1.7–5.3 years). There was no difference in visceral stent complication rate between renal, SMA and coeliac arteries. Visceral stent complications were more frequent in more complex grafts compared to less complex grafts. Visceral stent complications were more frequent in uncovered stents compared to covered stents. Visceral stent-related endoleaks (type Ic and type IIIa) occurred exclusively around renal artery stents. The most common modes of failure with SMA stents were kinking and fracture, whereas with coeliac artery stents it was external crush. Conclusion Visceral stent complications after FEVAR are common and merit continued and close long-term surveillance. The mode of visceral stent failure varies across the vessels in which the stents are located.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/20480040211012503
work_keys_str_mv AT shaneelrpatel characterisingtheincidenceandmodeofvisceralstentfailureafterfenestratedendovascularaneurysmrepairfevar
AT iainnroy characterisingtheincidenceandmodeofvisceralstentfailureafterfenestratedendovascularaneurysmrepairfevar
AT richardgmcwilliams characterisingtheincidenceandmodeofvisceralstentfailureafterfenestratedendovascularaneurysmrepairfevar
AT johnabrennan characterisingtheincidenceandmodeofvisceralstentfailureafterfenestratedendovascularaneurysmrepairfevar
AT srinivasarvallabhaneni characterisingtheincidenceandmodeofvisceralstentfailureafterfenestratedendovascularaneurysmrepairfevar
AT simonkneequaye characterisingtheincidenceandmodeofvisceralstentfailureafterfenestratedendovascularaneurysmrepairfevar
AT jonathandsmout characterisingtheincidenceandmodeofvisceralstentfailureafterfenestratedendovascularaneurysmrepairfevar
AT robertkfisher characterisingtheincidenceandmodeofvisceralstentfailureafterfenestratedendovascularaneurysmrepairfevar
_version_ 1721454910521737216