The Capitalist World-System and U.S. Cold War Policies in the Core and the Periphery: A Comparative Analysis of Post-World War II American Nation-building in Germany and Korea

In response to the emerging cold war, why did the United States stress industrial expansion in Western Europe but focus on primary production alongside policing operations in the non-western world? Examining US postwar occupation in Germany and Korea from a world-systems perspective, this article ar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Y. Hugh Jo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2015-08-01
Series:Journal of World-Systems Research
Online Access:http://jwsr.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/jwsr/article/view/420
id doaj-34a02682775043b8937fa078d129559c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-34a02682775043b8937fa078d129559c2020-11-24T23:58:01ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghJournal of World-Systems Research1076-156X2015-08-0117242845510.5195/jwsr.2011.420414The Capitalist World-System and U.S. Cold War Policies in the Core and the Periphery: A Comparative Analysis of Post-World War II American Nation-building in Germany and KoreaY. Hugh Jo0Westfield State UniversityIn response to the emerging cold war, why did the United States stress industrial expansion in Western Europe but focus on primary production alongside policing operations in the non-western world? Examining US postwar occupation in Germany and Korea from a world-systems perspective, this article argues that a given countrys standing in the capitalist economy generally shapes American foreign policy toward that particular country in the early cold war years. A paladin of system-wide prosperity and peace, the United States sought to restore the international division of labor after World War II. Reactions varied across the system, however, because of distinct socio-economic developments. The presence of capital-intensive export-dependent industry afforded western Germany flexible labor-management relations. Politics was overall stable there, and America dispensed with heavy-handed intervention. In southern Korea, labor-exploitive tenancy farming rendered interclass compromise virtually impossible. As intransigent peasants threatened the market economy, the United States used force to keep the ally in the system.http://jwsr.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/jwsr/article/view/420
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Y. Hugh Jo
spellingShingle Y. Hugh Jo
The Capitalist World-System and U.S. Cold War Policies in the Core and the Periphery: A Comparative Analysis of Post-World War II American Nation-building in Germany and Korea
Journal of World-Systems Research
author_facet Y. Hugh Jo
author_sort Y. Hugh Jo
title The Capitalist World-System and U.S. Cold War Policies in the Core and the Periphery: A Comparative Analysis of Post-World War II American Nation-building in Germany and Korea
title_short The Capitalist World-System and U.S. Cold War Policies in the Core and the Periphery: A Comparative Analysis of Post-World War II American Nation-building in Germany and Korea
title_full The Capitalist World-System and U.S. Cold War Policies in the Core and the Periphery: A Comparative Analysis of Post-World War II American Nation-building in Germany and Korea
title_fullStr The Capitalist World-System and U.S. Cold War Policies in the Core and the Periphery: A Comparative Analysis of Post-World War II American Nation-building in Germany and Korea
title_full_unstemmed The Capitalist World-System and U.S. Cold War Policies in the Core and the Periphery: A Comparative Analysis of Post-World War II American Nation-building in Germany and Korea
title_sort capitalist world-system and u.s. cold war policies in the core and the periphery: a comparative analysis of post-world war ii american nation-building in germany and korea
publisher University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
series Journal of World-Systems Research
issn 1076-156X
publishDate 2015-08-01
description In response to the emerging cold war, why did the United States stress industrial expansion in Western Europe but focus on primary production alongside policing operations in the non-western world? Examining US postwar occupation in Germany and Korea from a world-systems perspective, this article argues that a given countrys standing in the capitalist economy generally shapes American foreign policy toward that particular country in the early cold war years. A paladin of system-wide prosperity and peace, the United States sought to restore the international division of labor after World War II. Reactions varied across the system, however, because of distinct socio-economic developments. The presence of capital-intensive export-dependent industry afforded western Germany flexible labor-management relations. Politics was overall stable there, and America dispensed with heavy-handed intervention. In southern Korea, labor-exploitive tenancy farming rendered interclass compromise virtually impossible. As intransigent peasants threatened the market economy, the United States used force to keep the ally in the system.
url http://jwsr.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/jwsr/article/view/420
work_keys_str_mv AT yhughjo thecapitalistworldsystemanduscoldwarpoliciesinthecoreandtheperipheryacomparativeanalysisofpostworldwariiamericannationbuildingingermanyandkorea
AT yhughjo capitalistworldsystemanduscoldwarpoliciesinthecoreandtheperipheryacomparativeanalysisofpostworldwariiamericannationbuildingingermanyandkorea
_version_ 1725452227285352448