The Capitalist World-System and U.S. Cold War Policies in the Core and the Periphery: A Comparative Analysis of Post-World War II American Nation-building in Germany and Korea
In response to the emerging cold war, why did the United States stress industrial expansion in Western Europe but focus on primary production alongside policing operations in the non-western world? Examining US postwar occupation in Germany and Korea from a world-systems perspective, this article ar...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
2015-08-01
|
Series: | Journal of World-Systems Research |
Online Access: | http://jwsr.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/jwsr/article/view/420 |
id |
doaj-34a02682775043b8937fa078d129559c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-34a02682775043b8937fa078d129559c2020-11-24T23:58:01ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghJournal of World-Systems Research1076-156X2015-08-0117242845510.5195/jwsr.2011.420414The Capitalist World-System and U.S. Cold War Policies in the Core and the Periphery: A Comparative Analysis of Post-World War II American Nation-building in Germany and KoreaY. Hugh Jo0Westfield State UniversityIn response to the emerging cold war, why did the United States stress industrial expansion in Western Europe but focus on primary production alongside policing operations in the non-western world? Examining US postwar occupation in Germany and Korea from a world-systems perspective, this article argues that a given countrys standing in the capitalist economy generally shapes American foreign policy toward that particular country in the early cold war years. A paladin of system-wide prosperity and peace, the United States sought to restore the international division of labor after World War II. Reactions varied across the system, however, because of distinct socio-economic developments. The presence of capital-intensive export-dependent industry afforded western Germany flexible labor-management relations. Politics was overall stable there, and America dispensed with heavy-handed intervention. In southern Korea, labor-exploitive tenancy farming rendered interclass compromise virtually impossible. As intransigent peasants threatened the market economy, the United States used force to keep the ally in the system.http://jwsr.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/jwsr/article/view/420 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Y. Hugh Jo |
spellingShingle |
Y. Hugh Jo The Capitalist World-System and U.S. Cold War Policies in the Core and the Periphery: A Comparative Analysis of Post-World War II American Nation-building in Germany and Korea Journal of World-Systems Research |
author_facet |
Y. Hugh Jo |
author_sort |
Y. Hugh Jo |
title |
The Capitalist World-System and U.S. Cold War Policies in the Core and the Periphery: A Comparative Analysis of Post-World War II American Nation-building in Germany and Korea |
title_short |
The Capitalist World-System and U.S. Cold War Policies in the Core and the Periphery: A Comparative Analysis of Post-World War II American Nation-building in Germany and Korea |
title_full |
The Capitalist World-System and U.S. Cold War Policies in the Core and the Periphery: A Comparative Analysis of Post-World War II American Nation-building in Germany and Korea |
title_fullStr |
The Capitalist World-System and U.S. Cold War Policies in the Core and the Periphery: A Comparative Analysis of Post-World War II American Nation-building in Germany and Korea |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Capitalist World-System and U.S. Cold War Policies in the Core and the Periphery: A Comparative Analysis of Post-World War II American Nation-building in Germany and Korea |
title_sort |
capitalist world-system and u.s. cold war policies in the core and the periphery: a comparative analysis of post-world war ii american nation-building in germany and korea |
publisher |
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh |
series |
Journal of World-Systems Research |
issn |
1076-156X |
publishDate |
2015-08-01 |
description |
In response to the emerging cold war, why did the United States stress industrial expansion in Western Europe but focus on primary production alongside policing operations in the non-western world? Examining US postwar occupation in Germany and Korea from a world-systems perspective, this article argues that a given countrys standing in the capitalist economy generally shapes American foreign policy toward that particular country in the early cold war years. A paladin of system-wide prosperity and peace, the United States sought to restore the international division of labor after World War II. Reactions varied across the system, however, because of distinct socio-economic developments. The presence of capital-intensive export-dependent industry afforded western Germany flexible labor-management relations. Politics was overall stable there, and America dispensed with heavy-handed intervention. In southern Korea, labor-exploitive tenancy farming rendered interclass compromise virtually impossible. As intransigent peasants threatened the market economy, the United States used force to keep the ally in the system. |
url |
http://jwsr.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/jwsr/article/view/420 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yhughjo thecapitalistworldsystemanduscoldwarpoliciesinthecoreandtheperipheryacomparativeanalysisofpostworldwariiamericannationbuildingingermanyandkorea AT yhughjo capitalistworldsystemanduscoldwarpoliciesinthecoreandtheperipheryacomparativeanalysisofpostworldwariiamericannationbuildingingermanyandkorea |
_version_ |
1725452227285352448 |