Temporal Trends in X-Ray Exposure during Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background. Percutaneous coronary intervention exposes patient and staff to ionizing radiation. Although staff only receive a small fraction of patient dose through scatter radiation, there are concerns about the potential health effects of repeated exposure. Minimizing both patient and occupational...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cedric Davidsen, Kirsten Bolstad, Ellisif Nygaard, Kjell Vikenes, Svein Rotevatn, Vegard Tuseth
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi-Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Interventional Cardiology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9602942
id doaj-349685341f434fba99d0f9714250528c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-349685341f434fba99d0f9714250528c2020-11-25T03:47:55ZengHindawi-WileyJournal of Interventional Cardiology0896-43271540-81832020-01-01202010.1155/2020/96029429602942Temporal Trends in X-Ray Exposure during Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary InterventionCedric Davidsen0Kirsten Bolstad1Ellisif Nygaard2Kjell Vikenes3Svein Rotevatn4Vegard Tuseth5Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, NorwayDepartment of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, NorwayDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, NorwayDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, NorwayDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, NorwayDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, NorwayBackground. Percutaneous coronary intervention exposes patient and staff to ionizing radiation. Although staff only receive a small fraction of patient dose through scatter radiation, there are concerns about the potential health effects of repeated exposure. Minimizing both patient and occupational exposure is needed. Objective. This article investigates patient and operator X-ray exposure over time in coronary intervention in relation to upgraded X-ray equipment, improved shielding, and enhanced operator awareness. Materials and Methods. Data regarding irradiation time, patient dose, and patient characteristics were extracted from the Norwegian Registry for Invasive Cardiology (NORIC) for procedures performed from 2013 to mid-2019. Personal operator dosimetry records were provided by the Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority. Improved operator shielding and awareness measures were introduced in 2018. Results. In the period 2013 through June 2019, 21499 procedures were recorded in our institution. Mean dose area product (DAP) for coronary angiography decreased 37% from 2981 μGy·m2 in 2013 to 1891 μGy·m2 in 2019 (p<0.001). For coronary intervention, DAP decreased 39% from 8358 μGy·m2 to 5055 μGy·m2. Personal dosimetry data indicate a 70% reduction in operator dose per procedure in 2019 compared to 2013. The most pronounced reduction occurred after improved radiation protection measures were implemented in 2018 (−48%). Conclusions. This study shows a temporal trend towards considerable reduction in X-ray doses received by the patient and operator during cardiac catheterization. Upgraded X-ray equipment, improved shielding, and enhanced operator awareness are likely contributors to this development.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9602942
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cedric Davidsen
Kirsten Bolstad
Ellisif Nygaard
Kjell Vikenes
Svein Rotevatn
Vegard Tuseth
spellingShingle Cedric Davidsen
Kirsten Bolstad
Ellisif Nygaard
Kjell Vikenes
Svein Rotevatn
Vegard Tuseth
Temporal Trends in X-Ray Exposure during Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Journal of Interventional Cardiology
author_facet Cedric Davidsen
Kirsten Bolstad
Ellisif Nygaard
Kjell Vikenes
Svein Rotevatn
Vegard Tuseth
author_sort Cedric Davidsen
title Temporal Trends in X-Ray Exposure during Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_short Temporal Trends in X-Ray Exposure during Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_full Temporal Trends in X-Ray Exposure during Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_fullStr Temporal Trends in X-Ray Exposure during Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_full_unstemmed Temporal Trends in X-Ray Exposure during Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
title_sort temporal trends in x-ray exposure during coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention
publisher Hindawi-Wiley
series Journal of Interventional Cardiology
issn 0896-4327
1540-8183
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Background. Percutaneous coronary intervention exposes patient and staff to ionizing radiation. Although staff only receive a small fraction of patient dose through scatter radiation, there are concerns about the potential health effects of repeated exposure. Minimizing both patient and occupational exposure is needed. Objective. This article investigates patient and operator X-ray exposure over time in coronary intervention in relation to upgraded X-ray equipment, improved shielding, and enhanced operator awareness. Materials and Methods. Data regarding irradiation time, patient dose, and patient characteristics were extracted from the Norwegian Registry for Invasive Cardiology (NORIC) for procedures performed from 2013 to mid-2019. Personal operator dosimetry records were provided by the Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority. Improved operator shielding and awareness measures were introduced in 2018. Results. In the period 2013 through June 2019, 21499 procedures were recorded in our institution. Mean dose area product (DAP) for coronary angiography decreased 37% from 2981 μGy·m2 in 2013 to 1891 μGy·m2 in 2019 (p<0.001). For coronary intervention, DAP decreased 39% from 8358 μGy·m2 to 5055 μGy·m2. Personal dosimetry data indicate a 70% reduction in operator dose per procedure in 2019 compared to 2013. The most pronounced reduction occurred after improved radiation protection measures were implemented in 2018 (−48%). Conclusions. This study shows a temporal trend towards considerable reduction in X-ray doses received by the patient and operator during cardiac catheterization. Upgraded X-ray equipment, improved shielding, and enhanced operator awareness are likely contributors to this development.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9602942
work_keys_str_mv AT cedricdavidsen temporaltrendsinxrayexposureduringcoronaryangiographyandpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT kirstenbolstad temporaltrendsinxrayexposureduringcoronaryangiographyandpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT ellisifnygaard temporaltrendsinxrayexposureduringcoronaryangiographyandpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT kjellvikenes temporaltrendsinxrayexposureduringcoronaryangiographyandpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT sveinrotevatn temporaltrendsinxrayexposureduringcoronaryangiographyandpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT vegardtuseth temporaltrendsinxrayexposureduringcoronaryangiographyandpercutaneouscoronaryintervention
_version_ 1715116065930870784