Collaborating for resilience: conflict, collective action, and transformation on Cambodia's Tonle Sap Lake

We report on outcomes and lessons learned from a 15-month initiative in Cambodia's Tonle Sap Lake. Employing the appreciation-influence-control (AIC) model of participatory stakeholder engagement, the initiative built shared understanding of the sources of vulnerability in fisheries livelihood...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Blake D. Ratner, Kosal Mam, Guy Halpern
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2014-09-01
Series:Ecology and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss3/art31/
id doaj-348d1510a85e400981fc10f15f1ac5bd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-348d1510a85e400981fc10f15f1ac5bd2020-11-24T21:52:46ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872014-09-011933110.5751/ES-06400-1903316400Collaborating for resilience: conflict, collective action, and transformation on Cambodia's Tonle Sap LakeBlake D. Ratner0Kosal Mam1Guy Halpern2WorldFishWorldFishWorldFishWe report on outcomes and lessons learned from a 15-month initiative in Cambodia's Tonle Sap Lake. Employing the appreciation-influence-control (AIC) model of participatory stakeholder engagement, the initiative built shared understanding of the sources of vulnerability in fisheries livelihoods and catalyzed collective action to support resilience in this valuable and productive social-ecological system. Outcomes include the transfer of a large, commercial fishing concession to community access, and resolution of a boundary dispute involving community fishery organizations in neighboring provinces. Motivated by these successes, the main national grassroots network representing fishing communities also modified its internal governance and strategy of engagement to emphasize constructive links with government and the formal NGO sector. The AIC approach, we argue, provides an effective route to enable collective action in ways that strengthen dialogue and collaboration across scales, fostering the conditions for local-level transformations that can contribute to improvement in governance. We conclude with a discussion of the broader implications for resilience practice.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss3/art31/Cambodiacivil societycollective actioncommunity-based managementfisheriesgovernanceresilienceresource conflictSoutheast Asiastakeholder collaborationtransformation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Blake D. Ratner
Kosal Mam
Guy Halpern
spellingShingle Blake D. Ratner
Kosal Mam
Guy Halpern
Collaborating for resilience: conflict, collective action, and transformation on Cambodia's Tonle Sap Lake
Ecology and Society
Cambodia
civil society
collective action
community-based management
fisheries
governance
resilience
resource conflict
Southeast Asia
stakeholder collaboration
transformation
author_facet Blake D. Ratner
Kosal Mam
Guy Halpern
author_sort Blake D. Ratner
title Collaborating for resilience: conflict, collective action, and transformation on Cambodia's Tonle Sap Lake
title_short Collaborating for resilience: conflict, collective action, and transformation on Cambodia's Tonle Sap Lake
title_full Collaborating for resilience: conflict, collective action, and transformation on Cambodia's Tonle Sap Lake
title_fullStr Collaborating for resilience: conflict, collective action, and transformation on Cambodia's Tonle Sap Lake
title_full_unstemmed Collaborating for resilience: conflict, collective action, and transformation on Cambodia's Tonle Sap Lake
title_sort collaborating for resilience: conflict, collective action, and transformation on cambodia's tonle sap lake
publisher Resilience Alliance
series Ecology and Society
issn 1708-3087
publishDate 2014-09-01
description We report on outcomes and lessons learned from a 15-month initiative in Cambodia's Tonle Sap Lake. Employing the appreciation-influence-control (AIC) model of participatory stakeholder engagement, the initiative built shared understanding of the sources of vulnerability in fisheries livelihoods and catalyzed collective action to support resilience in this valuable and productive social-ecological system. Outcomes include the transfer of a large, commercial fishing concession to community access, and resolution of a boundary dispute involving community fishery organizations in neighboring provinces. Motivated by these successes, the main national grassroots network representing fishing communities also modified its internal governance and strategy of engagement to emphasize constructive links with government and the formal NGO sector. The AIC approach, we argue, provides an effective route to enable collective action in ways that strengthen dialogue and collaboration across scales, fostering the conditions for local-level transformations that can contribute to improvement in governance. We conclude with a discussion of the broader implications for resilience practice.
topic Cambodia
civil society
collective action
community-based management
fisheries
governance
resilience
resource conflict
Southeast Asia
stakeholder collaboration
transformation
url http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss3/art31/
work_keys_str_mv AT blakedratner collaboratingforresilienceconflictcollectiveactionandtransformationoncambodiastonlesaplake
AT kosalmam collaboratingforresilienceconflictcollectiveactionandtransformationoncambodiastonlesaplake
AT guyhalpern collaboratingforresilienceconflictcollectiveactionandtransformationoncambodiastonlesaplake
_version_ 1716633778724536320