Collaborating for resilience: conflict, collective action, and transformation on Cambodia's Tonle Sap Lake
We report on outcomes and lessons learned from a 15-month initiative in Cambodia's Tonle Sap Lake. Employing the appreciation-influence-control (AIC) model of participatory stakeholder engagement, the initiative built shared understanding of the sources of vulnerability in fisheries livelihood...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Resilience Alliance
2014-09-01
|
Series: | Ecology and Society |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss3/art31/ |
id |
doaj-348d1510a85e400981fc10f15f1ac5bd |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-348d1510a85e400981fc10f15f1ac5bd2020-11-24T21:52:46ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872014-09-011933110.5751/ES-06400-1903316400Collaborating for resilience: conflict, collective action, and transformation on Cambodia's Tonle Sap LakeBlake D. Ratner0Kosal Mam1Guy Halpern2WorldFishWorldFishWorldFishWe report on outcomes and lessons learned from a 15-month initiative in Cambodia's Tonle Sap Lake. Employing the appreciation-influence-control (AIC) model of participatory stakeholder engagement, the initiative built shared understanding of the sources of vulnerability in fisheries livelihoods and catalyzed collective action to support resilience in this valuable and productive social-ecological system. Outcomes include the transfer of a large, commercial fishing concession to community access, and resolution of a boundary dispute involving community fishery organizations in neighboring provinces. Motivated by these successes, the main national grassroots network representing fishing communities also modified its internal governance and strategy of engagement to emphasize constructive links with government and the formal NGO sector. The AIC approach, we argue, provides an effective route to enable collective action in ways that strengthen dialogue and collaboration across scales, fostering the conditions for local-level transformations that can contribute to improvement in governance. We conclude with a discussion of the broader implications for resilience practice.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss3/art31/Cambodiacivil societycollective actioncommunity-based managementfisheriesgovernanceresilienceresource conflictSoutheast Asiastakeholder collaborationtransformation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Blake D. Ratner Kosal Mam Guy Halpern |
spellingShingle |
Blake D. Ratner Kosal Mam Guy Halpern Collaborating for resilience: conflict, collective action, and transformation on Cambodia's Tonle Sap Lake Ecology and Society Cambodia civil society collective action community-based management fisheries governance resilience resource conflict Southeast Asia stakeholder collaboration transformation |
author_facet |
Blake D. Ratner Kosal Mam Guy Halpern |
author_sort |
Blake D. Ratner |
title |
Collaborating for resilience: conflict, collective action, and transformation on Cambodia's Tonle Sap Lake |
title_short |
Collaborating for resilience: conflict, collective action, and transformation on Cambodia's Tonle Sap Lake |
title_full |
Collaborating for resilience: conflict, collective action, and transformation on Cambodia's Tonle Sap Lake |
title_fullStr |
Collaborating for resilience: conflict, collective action, and transformation on Cambodia's Tonle Sap Lake |
title_full_unstemmed |
Collaborating for resilience: conflict, collective action, and transformation on Cambodia's Tonle Sap Lake |
title_sort |
collaborating for resilience: conflict, collective action, and transformation on cambodia's tonle sap lake |
publisher |
Resilience Alliance |
series |
Ecology and Society |
issn |
1708-3087 |
publishDate |
2014-09-01 |
description |
We report on outcomes and lessons learned from a 15-month initiative in Cambodia's Tonle Sap Lake. Employing the appreciation-influence-control (AIC) model of participatory stakeholder engagement, the initiative built shared understanding of the sources of vulnerability in fisheries livelihoods and catalyzed collective action to support resilience in this valuable and productive social-ecological system. Outcomes include the transfer of a large, commercial fishing concession to community access, and resolution of a boundary dispute involving community fishery organizations in neighboring provinces. Motivated by these successes, the main national grassroots network representing fishing communities also modified its internal governance and strategy of engagement to emphasize constructive links with government and the formal NGO sector. The AIC approach, we argue, provides an effective route to enable collective action in ways that strengthen dialogue and collaboration across scales, fostering the conditions for local-level transformations that can contribute to improvement in governance. We conclude with a discussion of the broader implications for resilience practice. |
topic |
Cambodia civil society collective action community-based management fisheries governance resilience resource conflict Southeast Asia stakeholder collaboration transformation |
url |
http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss3/art31/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT blakedratner collaboratingforresilienceconflictcollectiveactionandtransformationoncambodiastonlesaplake AT kosalmam collaboratingforresilienceconflictcollectiveactionandtransformationoncambodiastonlesaplake AT guyhalpern collaboratingforresilienceconflictcollectiveactionandtransformationoncambodiastonlesaplake |
_version_ |
1716633778724536320 |