Duration of Treatment Effect Using IncobotulinumtoxinA for Upper-limb Spasticity: A Post-hoc Analysis
The efficacy and safety of incobotulinumtoxinA ≤400 U was demonstrated in subjects with post-stroke upper-limb spasticity in a randomized, double-blind Phase 3 study with an open-label extension (OLEX; EudraCT number 2005-003951-11, NCT00432666). We report a post-hoc analysis of the duration of the...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Neurology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2020.615706/full |
id |
doaj-3482843288bf4142acc4a52be0cb4946 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3482843288bf4142acc4a52be0cb49462021-01-22T05:53:05ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952021-01-011110.3389/fneur.2020.615706615706Duration of Treatment Effect Using IncobotulinumtoxinA for Upper-limb Spasticity: A Post-hoc AnalysisPetr Kaňovský0Elie P. Elovic1Angelika Hanschmann2Irena Pulte3Michael Althaus4Reinhard Hiersemenzel5Christina Marciniak6Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry and University Hospital, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, CzechiaMoss Rehabilitation, Philadelphia, PA, United StatesMerz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, GermanyMerz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, GermanyMerz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, GermanyMerz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, GermanyDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and the Department of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, United StatesThe efficacy and safety of incobotulinumtoxinA ≤400 U was demonstrated in subjects with post-stroke upper-limb spasticity in a randomized, double-blind Phase 3 study with an open-label extension (OLEX; EudraCT number 2005-003951-11, NCT00432666). We report a post-hoc analysis of the duration of the treatment effect. Subjects completing the placebo-controlled main period (single injection cycle with 12–20-week observation) entered the OLEX and received a maximum of five further treatments (maximum duration 69 weeks) with incobotulinumtoxinA ≤400 U at flexible intervals with a minimum duration of 12 weeks, based on clinical need. Intervals between two consecutive incobotulinumtoxinA injections, excluding treatment intervals prior to the end-of-study visit, were evaluated. Of 437 incobotulinumtoxinA treatment intervals, 415 received by 136 subjects were included in the post-hoc analysis. More than half (52.3%; 217/415) of all incobotulinumtoxinA reinjections were administered at Week ≥14, 31.1% (129/415) at Week ≥16, 19.0% (79/415) at Week ≥18, and 11.6% (48/415) at Week ≥20. The duration of effect may vary and can exceed 20 weeks or more, which was observed in at least one injection cycle in 29.4% (40/136) subjects over the course of their treatment. Data show that incobotulinumtoxinA retreatment for upper-limb spasticity may not be required at 12-week intervals and provides evidence for flexible treatment intervals beyond this time frame.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2020.615706/fullduration of effectincobotulinumtoxinApost-strokeupper-limb spasticitytreatment interval |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Petr Kaňovský Elie P. Elovic Angelika Hanschmann Irena Pulte Michael Althaus Reinhard Hiersemenzel Christina Marciniak |
spellingShingle |
Petr Kaňovský Elie P. Elovic Angelika Hanschmann Irena Pulte Michael Althaus Reinhard Hiersemenzel Christina Marciniak Duration of Treatment Effect Using IncobotulinumtoxinA for Upper-limb Spasticity: A Post-hoc Analysis Frontiers in Neurology duration of effect incobotulinumtoxinA post-stroke upper-limb spasticity treatment interval |
author_facet |
Petr Kaňovský Elie P. Elovic Angelika Hanschmann Irena Pulte Michael Althaus Reinhard Hiersemenzel Christina Marciniak |
author_sort |
Petr Kaňovský |
title |
Duration of Treatment Effect Using IncobotulinumtoxinA for Upper-limb Spasticity: A Post-hoc Analysis |
title_short |
Duration of Treatment Effect Using IncobotulinumtoxinA for Upper-limb Spasticity: A Post-hoc Analysis |
title_full |
Duration of Treatment Effect Using IncobotulinumtoxinA for Upper-limb Spasticity: A Post-hoc Analysis |
title_fullStr |
Duration of Treatment Effect Using IncobotulinumtoxinA for Upper-limb Spasticity: A Post-hoc Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Duration of Treatment Effect Using IncobotulinumtoxinA for Upper-limb Spasticity: A Post-hoc Analysis |
title_sort |
duration of treatment effect using incobotulinumtoxina for upper-limb spasticity: a post-hoc analysis |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Neurology |
issn |
1664-2295 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
The efficacy and safety of incobotulinumtoxinA ≤400 U was demonstrated in subjects with post-stroke upper-limb spasticity in a randomized, double-blind Phase 3 study with an open-label extension (OLEX; EudraCT number 2005-003951-11, NCT00432666). We report a post-hoc analysis of the duration of the treatment effect. Subjects completing the placebo-controlled main period (single injection cycle with 12–20-week observation) entered the OLEX and received a maximum of five further treatments (maximum duration 69 weeks) with incobotulinumtoxinA ≤400 U at flexible intervals with a minimum duration of 12 weeks, based on clinical need. Intervals between two consecutive incobotulinumtoxinA injections, excluding treatment intervals prior to the end-of-study visit, were evaluated. Of 437 incobotulinumtoxinA treatment intervals, 415 received by 136 subjects were included in the post-hoc analysis. More than half (52.3%; 217/415) of all incobotulinumtoxinA reinjections were administered at Week ≥14, 31.1% (129/415) at Week ≥16, 19.0% (79/415) at Week ≥18, and 11.6% (48/415) at Week ≥20. The duration of effect may vary and can exceed 20 weeks or more, which was observed in at least one injection cycle in 29.4% (40/136) subjects over the course of their treatment. Data show that incobotulinumtoxinA retreatment for upper-limb spasticity may not be required at 12-week intervals and provides evidence for flexible treatment intervals beyond this time frame. |
topic |
duration of effect incobotulinumtoxinA post-stroke upper-limb spasticity treatment interval |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2020.615706/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT petrkanovsky durationoftreatmenteffectusingincobotulinumtoxinaforupperlimbspasticityaposthocanalysis AT eliepelovic durationoftreatmenteffectusingincobotulinumtoxinaforupperlimbspasticityaposthocanalysis AT angelikahanschmann durationoftreatmenteffectusingincobotulinumtoxinaforupperlimbspasticityaposthocanalysis AT irenapulte durationoftreatmenteffectusingincobotulinumtoxinaforupperlimbspasticityaposthocanalysis AT michaelalthaus durationoftreatmenteffectusingincobotulinumtoxinaforupperlimbspasticityaposthocanalysis AT reinhardhiersemenzel durationoftreatmenteffectusingincobotulinumtoxinaforupperlimbspasticityaposthocanalysis AT christinamarciniak durationoftreatmenteffectusingincobotulinumtoxinaforupperlimbspasticityaposthocanalysis |
_version_ |
1724328528959242240 |