Duration of Treatment Effect Using IncobotulinumtoxinA for Upper-limb Spasticity: A Post-hoc Analysis

The efficacy and safety of incobotulinumtoxinA ≤400 U was demonstrated in subjects with post-stroke upper-limb spasticity in a randomized, double-blind Phase 3 study with an open-label extension (OLEX; EudraCT number 2005-003951-11, NCT00432666). We report a post-hoc analysis of the duration of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Petr Kaňovský, Elie P. Elovic, Angelika Hanschmann, Irena Pulte, Michael Althaus, Reinhard Hiersemenzel, Christina Marciniak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2020.615706/full
id doaj-3482843288bf4142acc4a52be0cb4946
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3482843288bf4142acc4a52be0cb49462021-01-22T05:53:05ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952021-01-011110.3389/fneur.2020.615706615706Duration of Treatment Effect Using IncobotulinumtoxinA for Upper-limb Spasticity: A Post-hoc AnalysisPetr Kaňovský0Elie P. Elovic1Angelika Hanschmann2Irena Pulte3Michael Althaus4Reinhard Hiersemenzel5Christina Marciniak6Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry and University Hospital, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, CzechiaMoss Rehabilitation, Philadelphia, PA, United StatesMerz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, GermanyMerz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, GermanyMerz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, GermanyMerz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, GermanyDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and the Department of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, United StatesThe efficacy and safety of incobotulinumtoxinA ≤400 U was demonstrated in subjects with post-stroke upper-limb spasticity in a randomized, double-blind Phase 3 study with an open-label extension (OLEX; EudraCT number 2005-003951-11, NCT00432666). We report a post-hoc analysis of the duration of the treatment effect. Subjects completing the placebo-controlled main period (single injection cycle with 12–20-week observation) entered the OLEX and received a maximum of five further treatments (maximum duration 69 weeks) with incobotulinumtoxinA ≤400 U at flexible intervals with a minimum duration of 12 weeks, based on clinical need. Intervals between two consecutive incobotulinumtoxinA injections, excluding treatment intervals prior to the end-of-study visit, were evaluated. Of 437 incobotulinumtoxinA treatment intervals, 415 received by 136 subjects were included in the post-hoc analysis. More than half (52.3%; 217/415) of all incobotulinumtoxinA reinjections were administered at Week ≥14, 31.1% (129/415) at Week ≥16, 19.0% (79/415) at Week ≥18, and 11.6% (48/415) at Week ≥20. The duration of effect may vary and can exceed 20 weeks or more, which was observed in at least one injection cycle in 29.4% (40/136) subjects over the course of their treatment. Data show that incobotulinumtoxinA retreatment for upper-limb spasticity may not be required at 12-week intervals and provides evidence for flexible treatment intervals beyond this time frame.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2020.615706/fullduration of effectincobotulinumtoxinApost-strokeupper-limb spasticitytreatment interval
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Petr Kaňovský
Elie P. Elovic
Angelika Hanschmann
Irena Pulte
Michael Althaus
Reinhard Hiersemenzel
Christina Marciniak
spellingShingle Petr Kaňovský
Elie P. Elovic
Angelika Hanschmann
Irena Pulte
Michael Althaus
Reinhard Hiersemenzel
Christina Marciniak
Duration of Treatment Effect Using IncobotulinumtoxinA for Upper-limb Spasticity: A Post-hoc Analysis
Frontiers in Neurology
duration of effect
incobotulinumtoxinA
post-stroke
upper-limb spasticity
treatment interval
author_facet Petr Kaňovský
Elie P. Elovic
Angelika Hanschmann
Irena Pulte
Michael Althaus
Reinhard Hiersemenzel
Christina Marciniak
author_sort Petr Kaňovský
title Duration of Treatment Effect Using IncobotulinumtoxinA for Upper-limb Spasticity: A Post-hoc Analysis
title_short Duration of Treatment Effect Using IncobotulinumtoxinA for Upper-limb Spasticity: A Post-hoc Analysis
title_full Duration of Treatment Effect Using IncobotulinumtoxinA for Upper-limb Spasticity: A Post-hoc Analysis
title_fullStr Duration of Treatment Effect Using IncobotulinumtoxinA for Upper-limb Spasticity: A Post-hoc Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Duration of Treatment Effect Using IncobotulinumtoxinA for Upper-limb Spasticity: A Post-hoc Analysis
title_sort duration of treatment effect using incobotulinumtoxina for upper-limb spasticity: a post-hoc analysis
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Neurology
issn 1664-2295
publishDate 2021-01-01
description The efficacy and safety of incobotulinumtoxinA ≤400 U was demonstrated in subjects with post-stroke upper-limb spasticity in a randomized, double-blind Phase 3 study with an open-label extension (OLEX; EudraCT number 2005-003951-11, NCT00432666). We report a post-hoc analysis of the duration of the treatment effect. Subjects completing the placebo-controlled main period (single injection cycle with 12–20-week observation) entered the OLEX and received a maximum of five further treatments (maximum duration 69 weeks) with incobotulinumtoxinA ≤400 U at flexible intervals with a minimum duration of 12 weeks, based on clinical need. Intervals between two consecutive incobotulinumtoxinA injections, excluding treatment intervals prior to the end-of-study visit, were evaluated. Of 437 incobotulinumtoxinA treatment intervals, 415 received by 136 subjects were included in the post-hoc analysis. More than half (52.3%; 217/415) of all incobotulinumtoxinA reinjections were administered at Week ≥14, 31.1% (129/415) at Week ≥16, 19.0% (79/415) at Week ≥18, and 11.6% (48/415) at Week ≥20. The duration of effect may vary and can exceed 20 weeks or more, which was observed in at least one injection cycle in 29.4% (40/136) subjects over the course of their treatment. Data show that incobotulinumtoxinA retreatment for upper-limb spasticity may not be required at 12-week intervals and provides evidence for flexible treatment intervals beyond this time frame.
topic duration of effect
incobotulinumtoxinA
post-stroke
upper-limb spasticity
treatment interval
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2020.615706/full
work_keys_str_mv AT petrkanovsky durationoftreatmenteffectusingincobotulinumtoxinaforupperlimbspasticityaposthocanalysis
AT eliepelovic durationoftreatmenteffectusingincobotulinumtoxinaforupperlimbspasticityaposthocanalysis
AT angelikahanschmann durationoftreatmenteffectusingincobotulinumtoxinaforupperlimbspasticityaposthocanalysis
AT irenapulte durationoftreatmenteffectusingincobotulinumtoxinaforupperlimbspasticityaposthocanalysis
AT michaelalthaus durationoftreatmenteffectusingincobotulinumtoxinaforupperlimbspasticityaposthocanalysis
AT reinhardhiersemenzel durationoftreatmenteffectusingincobotulinumtoxinaforupperlimbspasticityaposthocanalysis
AT christinamarciniak durationoftreatmenteffectusingincobotulinumtoxinaforupperlimbspasticityaposthocanalysis
_version_ 1724328528959242240