Stated-preference research in HIV: A scoping review.

Discrete choice experiments (DCE), conjoint analysis (CA), and best-worst scaling (BWS) are quantitative techniques for estimating consumer preferences for products or services. These methods are increasingly used in healthcare research, but their applications within the field of HIV research have n...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John M Humphrey, Violet Naanyu, Katherine R MacDonald, Kara Wools-Kaloustian, Gregory D Zimet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224566
id doaj-347cbbea68504e86adb0f1cb23b78263
record_format Article
spelling doaj-347cbbea68504e86adb0f1cb23b782632021-03-03T21:13:53ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-011410e022456610.1371/journal.pone.0224566Stated-preference research in HIV: A scoping review.John M HumphreyViolet NaanyuKatherine R MacDonaldKara Wools-KaloustianGregory D ZimetDiscrete choice experiments (DCE), conjoint analysis (CA), and best-worst scaling (BWS) are quantitative techniques for estimating consumer preferences for products or services. These methods are increasingly used in healthcare research, but their applications within the field of HIV research have not yet been described. The objective of this scoping review was to systematically map the extent and nature of published DCE, CA, and BWS studies in the field of HIV and identify priority areas where these methods can be used in the future. Online databases were searched to identify published HIV-related DCE, CA and BWS studies in any country and year as the primary outcome. After screening 1,496 citations, 57 studies were identified that were conducted in 26 countries from 2000-2017. The frequency of published studies increased over time and covered HIV themes relating to prevention (n = 25), counselling and testing (n = 10), service delivery (n = 10), and antiretroviral therapy (n = 12). Most studies were DCEs (63%) followed by CA (37%) and BWS (4%). The median [IQR] sample size was 288 [138-496] participants, and 74% of studies used primary qualitative data to develop attributes. Only 30% of studies were conducted in sub-Saharan Africa where the burden of HIV is highest. Moreover, few studies surveyed key populations including men who have sex with men, transgender people, pregnant and postpartum women, adolescents, and people who inject drugs. These populations represent priorities for future stated-preference research. This scoping review can help researchers, policy makers, program implementers, and health economists to better understand the various applications of stated-preference research methods in the field of HIV.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224566
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author John M Humphrey
Violet Naanyu
Katherine R MacDonald
Kara Wools-Kaloustian
Gregory D Zimet
spellingShingle John M Humphrey
Violet Naanyu
Katherine R MacDonald
Kara Wools-Kaloustian
Gregory D Zimet
Stated-preference research in HIV: A scoping review.
PLoS ONE
author_facet John M Humphrey
Violet Naanyu
Katherine R MacDonald
Kara Wools-Kaloustian
Gregory D Zimet
author_sort John M Humphrey
title Stated-preference research in HIV: A scoping review.
title_short Stated-preference research in HIV: A scoping review.
title_full Stated-preference research in HIV: A scoping review.
title_fullStr Stated-preference research in HIV: A scoping review.
title_full_unstemmed Stated-preference research in HIV: A scoping review.
title_sort stated-preference research in hiv: a scoping review.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Discrete choice experiments (DCE), conjoint analysis (CA), and best-worst scaling (BWS) are quantitative techniques for estimating consumer preferences for products or services. These methods are increasingly used in healthcare research, but their applications within the field of HIV research have not yet been described. The objective of this scoping review was to systematically map the extent and nature of published DCE, CA, and BWS studies in the field of HIV and identify priority areas where these methods can be used in the future. Online databases were searched to identify published HIV-related DCE, CA and BWS studies in any country and year as the primary outcome. After screening 1,496 citations, 57 studies were identified that were conducted in 26 countries from 2000-2017. The frequency of published studies increased over time and covered HIV themes relating to prevention (n = 25), counselling and testing (n = 10), service delivery (n = 10), and antiretroviral therapy (n = 12). Most studies were DCEs (63%) followed by CA (37%) and BWS (4%). The median [IQR] sample size was 288 [138-496] participants, and 74% of studies used primary qualitative data to develop attributes. Only 30% of studies were conducted in sub-Saharan Africa where the burden of HIV is highest. Moreover, few studies surveyed key populations including men who have sex with men, transgender people, pregnant and postpartum women, adolescents, and people who inject drugs. These populations represent priorities for future stated-preference research. This scoping review can help researchers, policy makers, program implementers, and health economists to better understand the various applications of stated-preference research methods in the field of HIV.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224566
work_keys_str_mv AT johnmhumphrey statedpreferenceresearchinhivascopingreview
AT violetnaanyu statedpreferenceresearchinhivascopingreview
AT katherinermacdonald statedpreferenceresearchinhivascopingreview
AT karawoolskaloustian statedpreferenceresearchinhivascopingreview
AT gregorydzimet statedpreferenceresearchinhivascopingreview
_version_ 1714818051219652608