Cathodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the right Temporo-Parietal Junction modulates the use of mitigating circumstances during moral judgments

Recently, a few transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) studies have shown that the right temporo-parietal junction (rTPJ) plays a causal role in moral reasoning especially in cases of accidental harms or failed attempted harms. The profile of result...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laëtitia Leloup, Diana Dongo Miletich, Gaëlle Andriet, Yves VANDERMEEREN, Dana Samson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00355/full
id doaj-34696267b28b4fc498beff117cd3469b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-34696267b28b4fc498beff117cd3469b2020-11-25T02:52:58ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612016-07-011010.3389/fnhum.2016.00355204175Cathodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the right Temporo-Parietal Junction modulates the use of mitigating circumstances during moral judgmentsLaëtitia Leloup0Diana Dongo Miletich1Gaëlle Andriet2Yves VANDERMEEREN3Yves VANDERMEEREN4Dana Samson5Dana Samson6Université catholique de Louvain (UCL)Université catholique de Louvain (UCL)Université catholique de Louvain (UCL)Université catholique de Louvain (UCL)Université catholique de Louvain (UCL)Université catholique de Louvain (UCL)Université catholique de Louvain (UCL)Recently, a few transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) studies have shown that the right temporo-parietal junction (rTPJ) plays a causal role in moral reasoning especially in cases of accidental harms or failed attempted harms. The profile of results across studies is however not entirely consistent: sometimes the stimulation affects predominantly failed attempted harms while sometimes the stimulation affects predominantly accidental harms. We argue that such discrepancy could reflect different functional contributions of the rTPJ in moral judgments and that the chosen design parameters or stimulation method may differentially bring to light one or the other functional role of the rTPJ. In the current study, we found that tDCS specifically affected accidental harms but not failed attempted harms. Low cathodal stimulation of the rTPJ led to a marginally significant increase in the severity of judgments of accidental harms (Experiment 1) while higher cathodal current intensity led to a highly significant decrease in the severity of judgments of accidental harms (Experiment 2). Our pattern of results in the context of our experimental design can best be explained by a causal role of the rTPJ in processing the mitigating circumstances which reduce a protagonist’s moral responsibility. We discuss these results in relation to the idea that the rTPJ may play multiple roles in moral cognition and in relation to methodological aspects related to the use of tDCS.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00355/fulltDCSmoral judgmentmoral responsibilitymitigating circumstancesRTPJ
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laëtitia Leloup
Diana Dongo Miletich
Gaëlle Andriet
Yves VANDERMEEREN
Yves VANDERMEEREN
Dana Samson
Dana Samson
spellingShingle Laëtitia Leloup
Diana Dongo Miletich
Gaëlle Andriet
Yves VANDERMEEREN
Yves VANDERMEEREN
Dana Samson
Dana Samson
Cathodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the right Temporo-Parietal Junction modulates the use of mitigating circumstances during moral judgments
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
tDCS
moral judgment
moral responsibility
mitigating circumstances
RTPJ
author_facet Laëtitia Leloup
Diana Dongo Miletich
Gaëlle Andriet
Yves VANDERMEEREN
Yves VANDERMEEREN
Dana Samson
Dana Samson
author_sort Laëtitia Leloup
title Cathodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the right Temporo-Parietal Junction modulates the use of mitigating circumstances during moral judgments
title_short Cathodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the right Temporo-Parietal Junction modulates the use of mitigating circumstances during moral judgments
title_full Cathodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the right Temporo-Parietal Junction modulates the use of mitigating circumstances during moral judgments
title_fullStr Cathodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the right Temporo-Parietal Junction modulates the use of mitigating circumstances during moral judgments
title_full_unstemmed Cathodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the right Temporo-Parietal Junction modulates the use of mitigating circumstances during moral judgments
title_sort cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on the right temporo-parietal junction modulates the use of mitigating circumstances during moral judgments
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
issn 1662-5161
publishDate 2016-07-01
description Recently, a few transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) studies have shown that the right temporo-parietal junction (rTPJ) plays a causal role in moral reasoning especially in cases of accidental harms or failed attempted harms. The profile of results across studies is however not entirely consistent: sometimes the stimulation affects predominantly failed attempted harms while sometimes the stimulation affects predominantly accidental harms. We argue that such discrepancy could reflect different functional contributions of the rTPJ in moral judgments and that the chosen design parameters or stimulation method may differentially bring to light one or the other functional role of the rTPJ. In the current study, we found that tDCS specifically affected accidental harms but not failed attempted harms. Low cathodal stimulation of the rTPJ led to a marginally significant increase in the severity of judgments of accidental harms (Experiment 1) while higher cathodal current intensity led to a highly significant decrease in the severity of judgments of accidental harms (Experiment 2). Our pattern of results in the context of our experimental design can best be explained by a causal role of the rTPJ in processing the mitigating circumstances which reduce a protagonist’s moral responsibility. We discuss these results in relation to the idea that the rTPJ may play multiple roles in moral cognition and in relation to methodological aspects related to the use of tDCS.
topic tDCS
moral judgment
moral responsibility
mitigating circumstances
RTPJ
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00355/full
work_keys_str_mv AT laetitialeloup cathodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationontherighttemporoparietaljunctionmodulatestheuseofmitigatingcircumstancesduringmoraljudgments
AT dianadongomiletich cathodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationontherighttemporoparietaljunctionmodulatestheuseofmitigatingcircumstancesduringmoraljudgments
AT gaelleandriet cathodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationontherighttemporoparietaljunctionmodulatestheuseofmitigatingcircumstancesduringmoraljudgments
AT yvesvandermeeren cathodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationontherighttemporoparietaljunctionmodulatestheuseofmitigatingcircumstancesduringmoraljudgments
AT yvesvandermeeren cathodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationontherighttemporoparietaljunctionmodulatestheuseofmitigatingcircumstancesduringmoraljudgments
AT danasamson cathodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationontherighttemporoparietaljunctionmodulatestheuseofmitigatingcircumstancesduringmoraljudgments
AT danasamson cathodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationontherighttemporoparietaljunctionmodulatestheuseofmitigatingcircumstancesduringmoraljudgments
_version_ 1724727566151974912