To SPB or not to SPB? A mixed methods analysis of self-protective behaviours to prevent repeat victimisation from cyber abuse

Abstract This paper presents the findings from a mixed-methods examination of self-protective behaviours (SPBs) adopted by victims of cyber abuse from the rational choice perspective. The data from a sample of the U.S. adults ( $$N = 746$$ N = 746 ), members of an online opt-in panel, were analysed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zarina I. Vakhitova, Rob I. Mawby, Clair L. Alston-Knox, Callum A. Stephens
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-11-01
Series:Crime Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40163-020-00134-5
id doaj-3461a6135dfb40a997e2a2603f687003
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3461a6135dfb40a997e2a2603f6870032020-11-25T04:04:00ZengBMCCrime Science2193-76802020-11-019111810.1186/s40163-020-00134-5To SPB or not to SPB? A mixed methods analysis of self-protective behaviours to prevent repeat victimisation from cyber abuseZarina I. Vakhitova0Rob I. Mawby1Clair L. Alston-Knox2Callum A. Stephens3Monash UniversityHarper Adams UniversityPredictive Analytics GroupMonash UniversityAbstract This paper presents the findings from a mixed-methods examination of self-protective behaviours (SPBs) adopted by victims of cyber abuse from the rational choice perspective. The data from a sample of the U.S. adults ( $$N = 746$$ N = 746 ), members of an online opt-in panel, were analysed to first distinguish the types of SPBs adopted by victims of cyber abuse using a thematic analysis of open-ended responses. We then identified the factors associated with an increased likelihood of adopting SPBs and the specific identified types of SPBs using logistic regression with Bayesian variable selection and a stochastic search algorithm. Of the six identified types of SPBs, adjusting privacy settings was the most commonly reported response, and improving security (e.g. changing passwords, etc.) was the least common SPB. Older victims who reported higher than the average perceived impact from victimisation, were abused by a stranger and experienced either surveillance of their online activities or multiple types of abuse, were significantly more likely to adopt an SPB. Our findings inform strategies for both Internet user education and for preventing cyber abuse victimisation.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40163-020-00134-5Cyber abuseSelf-protective behavioursRepeat victimisationBayesian variable selectionStochastic search algorithm
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zarina I. Vakhitova
Rob I. Mawby
Clair L. Alston-Knox
Callum A. Stephens
spellingShingle Zarina I. Vakhitova
Rob I. Mawby
Clair L. Alston-Knox
Callum A. Stephens
To SPB or not to SPB? A mixed methods analysis of self-protective behaviours to prevent repeat victimisation from cyber abuse
Crime Science
Cyber abuse
Self-protective behaviours
Repeat victimisation
Bayesian variable selection
Stochastic search algorithm
author_facet Zarina I. Vakhitova
Rob I. Mawby
Clair L. Alston-Knox
Callum A. Stephens
author_sort Zarina I. Vakhitova
title To SPB or not to SPB? A mixed methods analysis of self-protective behaviours to prevent repeat victimisation from cyber abuse
title_short To SPB or not to SPB? A mixed methods analysis of self-protective behaviours to prevent repeat victimisation from cyber abuse
title_full To SPB or not to SPB? A mixed methods analysis of self-protective behaviours to prevent repeat victimisation from cyber abuse
title_fullStr To SPB or not to SPB? A mixed methods analysis of self-protective behaviours to prevent repeat victimisation from cyber abuse
title_full_unstemmed To SPB or not to SPB? A mixed methods analysis of self-protective behaviours to prevent repeat victimisation from cyber abuse
title_sort to spb or not to spb? a mixed methods analysis of self-protective behaviours to prevent repeat victimisation from cyber abuse
publisher BMC
series Crime Science
issn 2193-7680
publishDate 2020-11-01
description Abstract This paper presents the findings from a mixed-methods examination of self-protective behaviours (SPBs) adopted by victims of cyber abuse from the rational choice perspective. The data from a sample of the U.S. adults ( $$N = 746$$ N = 746 ), members of an online opt-in panel, were analysed to first distinguish the types of SPBs adopted by victims of cyber abuse using a thematic analysis of open-ended responses. We then identified the factors associated with an increased likelihood of adopting SPBs and the specific identified types of SPBs using logistic regression with Bayesian variable selection and a stochastic search algorithm. Of the six identified types of SPBs, adjusting privacy settings was the most commonly reported response, and improving security (e.g. changing passwords, etc.) was the least common SPB. Older victims who reported higher than the average perceived impact from victimisation, were abused by a stranger and experienced either surveillance of their online activities or multiple types of abuse, were significantly more likely to adopt an SPB. Our findings inform strategies for both Internet user education and for preventing cyber abuse victimisation.
topic Cyber abuse
Self-protective behaviours
Repeat victimisation
Bayesian variable selection
Stochastic search algorithm
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40163-020-00134-5
work_keys_str_mv AT zarinaivakhitova tospbornottospbamixedmethodsanalysisofselfprotectivebehaviourstopreventrepeatvictimisationfromcyberabuse
AT robimawby tospbornottospbamixedmethodsanalysisofselfprotectivebehaviourstopreventrepeatvictimisationfromcyberabuse
AT clairlalstonknox tospbornottospbamixedmethodsanalysisofselfprotectivebehaviourstopreventrepeatvictimisationfromcyberabuse
AT callumastephens tospbornottospbamixedmethodsanalysisofselfprotectivebehaviourstopreventrepeatvictimisationfromcyberabuse
_version_ 1724438128595304448