Global Explorers Journaling and Reflection Initiative

Research suggests that journaling will increase reflection and improve program outcomes (Bain, et al, 1999; Duerden, et al, 2012) This study involved a partnership with a non-profit, Global Explorers (GEx), which provides international immersion experiences for youth. Their programs are designed to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John Bennion, Mat Duerden, Anne Whitehouse
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2016-12-01
Series:Journal of Youth Development
Online Access:http://jyd.pitt.edu/ojs/jyd/article/view/445
id doaj-344edbaeb27a4ce3b8ec3d169077632d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-344edbaeb27a4ce3b8ec3d169077632d2020-11-25T01:55:52ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghJournal of Youth Development2325-40172016-12-0111210.5195/jyd.2016.445420Global Explorers Journaling and Reflection InitiativeJohn Bennion0Mat Duerden1Anne Whitehouse2Department of English, Brigham Young UniversityDepartment of Recreation Management, Brigham Young UniversityDepartment of Biology, Brigham Young UniversityResearch suggests that journaling will increase reflection and improve program outcomes (Bain, et al, 1999; Duerden, et al, 2012) This study involved a partnership with a non-profit, Global Explorers (GEx), which provides international immersion experiences for youth. Their programs are designed to teach youth participants principles of leadership, environmental awareness, service, and science. This study, which tested whether teaching journaling techniques to youth program facilitators would have a positive impact on participant outcomes, addressed the following hypotheses: 1) Greater training in reflective thinking among participants would be associated with higher outcome scores, and 2) Participants in the intervention group (facilitators trained in journaling pedagogy) would show greater increases in reflective thinking than comparison group members. Results based on participant self-assessment were significant in testing the first hypothesis; reflective thinking is positively associated with outcome measures, but the intervention group did not show increases in reflective thinking.http://jyd.pitt.edu/ojs/jyd/article/view/445
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author John Bennion
Mat Duerden
Anne Whitehouse
spellingShingle John Bennion
Mat Duerden
Anne Whitehouse
Global Explorers Journaling and Reflection Initiative
Journal of Youth Development
author_facet John Bennion
Mat Duerden
Anne Whitehouse
author_sort John Bennion
title Global Explorers Journaling and Reflection Initiative
title_short Global Explorers Journaling and Reflection Initiative
title_full Global Explorers Journaling and Reflection Initiative
title_fullStr Global Explorers Journaling and Reflection Initiative
title_full_unstemmed Global Explorers Journaling and Reflection Initiative
title_sort global explorers journaling and reflection initiative
publisher University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
series Journal of Youth Development
issn 2325-4017
publishDate 2016-12-01
description Research suggests that journaling will increase reflection and improve program outcomes (Bain, et al, 1999; Duerden, et al, 2012) This study involved a partnership with a non-profit, Global Explorers (GEx), which provides international immersion experiences for youth. Their programs are designed to teach youth participants principles of leadership, environmental awareness, service, and science. This study, which tested whether teaching journaling techniques to youth program facilitators would have a positive impact on participant outcomes, addressed the following hypotheses: 1) Greater training in reflective thinking among participants would be associated with higher outcome scores, and 2) Participants in the intervention group (facilitators trained in journaling pedagogy) would show greater increases in reflective thinking than comparison group members. Results based on participant self-assessment were significant in testing the first hypothesis; reflective thinking is positively associated with outcome measures, but the intervention group did not show increases in reflective thinking.
url http://jyd.pitt.edu/ojs/jyd/article/view/445
work_keys_str_mv AT johnbennion globalexplorersjournalingandreflectioninitiative
AT matduerden globalexplorersjournalingandreflectioninitiative
AT annewhitehouse globalexplorersjournalingandreflectioninitiative
_version_ 1724982867457474560