Global Explorers Journaling and Reflection Initiative
Research suggests that journaling will increase reflection and improve program outcomes (Bain, et al, 1999; Duerden, et al, 2012) This study involved a partnership with a non-profit, Global Explorers (GEx), which provides international immersion experiences for youth. Their programs are designed to...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
2016-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Youth Development |
Online Access: | http://jyd.pitt.edu/ojs/jyd/article/view/445 |
id |
doaj-344edbaeb27a4ce3b8ec3d169077632d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-344edbaeb27a4ce3b8ec3d169077632d2020-11-25T01:55:52ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghJournal of Youth Development2325-40172016-12-0111210.5195/jyd.2016.445420Global Explorers Journaling and Reflection InitiativeJohn Bennion0Mat Duerden1Anne Whitehouse2Department of English, Brigham Young UniversityDepartment of Recreation Management, Brigham Young UniversityDepartment of Biology, Brigham Young UniversityResearch suggests that journaling will increase reflection and improve program outcomes (Bain, et al, 1999; Duerden, et al, 2012) This study involved a partnership with a non-profit, Global Explorers (GEx), which provides international immersion experiences for youth. Their programs are designed to teach youth participants principles of leadership, environmental awareness, service, and science. This study, which tested whether teaching journaling techniques to youth program facilitators would have a positive impact on participant outcomes, addressed the following hypotheses: 1) Greater training in reflective thinking among participants would be associated with higher outcome scores, and 2) Participants in the intervention group (facilitators trained in journaling pedagogy) would show greater increases in reflective thinking than comparison group members. Results based on participant self-assessment were significant in testing the first hypothesis; reflective thinking is positively associated with outcome measures, but the intervention group did not show increases in reflective thinking.http://jyd.pitt.edu/ojs/jyd/article/view/445 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
John Bennion Mat Duerden Anne Whitehouse |
spellingShingle |
John Bennion Mat Duerden Anne Whitehouse Global Explorers Journaling and Reflection Initiative Journal of Youth Development |
author_facet |
John Bennion Mat Duerden Anne Whitehouse |
author_sort |
John Bennion |
title |
Global Explorers Journaling and Reflection Initiative |
title_short |
Global Explorers Journaling and Reflection Initiative |
title_full |
Global Explorers Journaling and Reflection Initiative |
title_fullStr |
Global Explorers Journaling and Reflection Initiative |
title_full_unstemmed |
Global Explorers Journaling and Reflection Initiative |
title_sort |
global explorers journaling and reflection initiative |
publisher |
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh |
series |
Journal of Youth Development |
issn |
2325-4017 |
publishDate |
2016-12-01 |
description |
Research suggests that journaling will increase reflection and improve program outcomes (Bain, et al, 1999; Duerden, et al, 2012) This study involved a partnership with a non-profit, Global Explorers (GEx), which provides international immersion experiences for youth. Their programs are designed to teach youth participants principles of leadership, environmental awareness, service, and science. This study, which tested whether teaching journaling techniques to youth program facilitators would have a positive impact on participant outcomes, addressed the following hypotheses: 1) Greater training in reflective thinking among participants would be associated with higher outcome scores, and 2) Participants in the intervention group (facilitators trained in journaling pedagogy) would show greater increases in reflective thinking than comparison group members. Results based on participant self-assessment were significant in testing the first hypothesis; reflective thinking is positively associated with outcome measures, but the intervention group did not show increases in reflective thinking. |
url |
http://jyd.pitt.edu/ojs/jyd/article/view/445 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT johnbennion globalexplorersjournalingandreflectioninitiative AT matduerden globalexplorersjournalingandreflectioninitiative AT annewhitehouse globalexplorersjournalingandreflectioninitiative |
_version_ |
1724982867457474560 |