Athletes' and Coaches' Attitudes Toward Protective Headgear as Concussion and Head Injury Prevention: A Scoping Review

The purpose of this article is to map existing research literature on athletes and coaches' attitudes toward protective headgear in sport in relation to concussion and head injury prevention, and to identify and analyse knowledge gaps in the field. A scoping review was conducted in three databa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne Tjønndal, Frida Austmo Wågan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fspor.2021.680773/full
id doaj-344bf9cae62644cab7cd5d00cf070731
record_format Article
spelling doaj-344bf9cae62644cab7cd5d00cf0707312021-05-25T04:42:22ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Sports and Active Living2624-93672021-05-01310.3389/fspor.2021.680773680773Athletes' and Coaches' Attitudes Toward Protective Headgear as Concussion and Head Injury Prevention: A Scoping ReviewAnne TjønndalFrida Austmo WåganThe purpose of this article is to map existing research literature on athletes and coaches' attitudes toward protective headgear in sport in relation to concussion and head injury prevention, and to identify and analyse knowledge gaps in the field. A scoping review was conducted in three databases; PubMed, Scopus, SportDiscus, and reference lists were searched to identify relevant grey literature. This process lead to an in-depth analysis of 18 peer-reviewed journal articles. Of the 18 studies identified, the majority focused on athletes (n = 14), only two studies focused on coaches, and two studies included a sample of both athletes and coaches. The findings in this scoping review suggests that there is a discrepancy between attitudes and beliefs about the protective effects of headgear, athletes' behaviour as far as wearing protective headgear, and coaches' behaviour in terms of recommending use of protective headgear to their athletes. The majority of athletes in most of the reviewed literature believed that headgear had protective effects against concussion and other head injuries, however relatively few athletes report wearing this protective headgear unless it was mandatory by competition rules.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fspor.2021.680773/fullhelmetmouthguardheadguardsport and injury preventionsports related concussionprotective headgear and attitudes
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anne Tjønndal
Frida Austmo Wågan
spellingShingle Anne Tjønndal
Frida Austmo Wågan
Athletes' and Coaches' Attitudes Toward Protective Headgear as Concussion and Head Injury Prevention: A Scoping Review
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
helmet
mouthguard
headguard
sport and injury prevention
sports related concussion
protective headgear and attitudes
author_facet Anne Tjønndal
Frida Austmo Wågan
author_sort Anne Tjønndal
title Athletes' and Coaches' Attitudes Toward Protective Headgear as Concussion and Head Injury Prevention: A Scoping Review
title_short Athletes' and Coaches' Attitudes Toward Protective Headgear as Concussion and Head Injury Prevention: A Scoping Review
title_full Athletes' and Coaches' Attitudes Toward Protective Headgear as Concussion and Head Injury Prevention: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Athletes' and Coaches' Attitudes Toward Protective Headgear as Concussion and Head Injury Prevention: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Athletes' and Coaches' Attitudes Toward Protective Headgear as Concussion and Head Injury Prevention: A Scoping Review
title_sort athletes' and coaches' attitudes toward protective headgear as concussion and head injury prevention: a scoping review
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
issn 2624-9367
publishDate 2021-05-01
description The purpose of this article is to map existing research literature on athletes and coaches' attitudes toward protective headgear in sport in relation to concussion and head injury prevention, and to identify and analyse knowledge gaps in the field. A scoping review was conducted in three databases; PubMed, Scopus, SportDiscus, and reference lists were searched to identify relevant grey literature. This process lead to an in-depth analysis of 18 peer-reviewed journal articles. Of the 18 studies identified, the majority focused on athletes (n = 14), only two studies focused on coaches, and two studies included a sample of both athletes and coaches. The findings in this scoping review suggests that there is a discrepancy between attitudes and beliefs about the protective effects of headgear, athletes' behaviour as far as wearing protective headgear, and coaches' behaviour in terms of recommending use of protective headgear to their athletes. The majority of athletes in most of the reviewed literature believed that headgear had protective effects against concussion and other head injuries, however relatively few athletes report wearing this protective headgear unless it was mandatory by competition rules.
topic helmet
mouthguard
headguard
sport and injury prevention
sports related concussion
protective headgear and attitudes
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fspor.2021.680773/full
work_keys_str_mv AT annetjønndal athletesandcoachesattitudestowardprotectiveheadgearasconcussionandheadinjurypreventionascopingreview
AT fridaaustmowagan athletesandcoachesattitudestowardprotectiveheadgearasconcussionandheadinjurypreventionascopingreview
_version_ 1721427963535163392