Screening women with a personal history of breast cancer: overview of the evidence on breast imaging surveillance

This work reviews the evidence on breast imaging for screening (surveillance) in women with a history of breast cancer (BC). Early detection of second BCs in these women improves their prognosis based on studies using mammography (usually with clinical examinations) for surveillance. Cohort studies...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nehmat Houssami, Nariya Cho
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine 2018-10-01
Series:Ultrasonography
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.e-ultrasonography.org/upload/usg-18017.pdf
id doaj-34434504041c41b99e17e2ddc144d1a7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-34434504041c41b99e17e2ddc144d1a72020-11-25T02:27:31ZengKorean Society of Ultrasound in MedicineUltrasonography2288-59192288-59432018-10-0137427728710.14366/usg.18017231Screening women with a personal history of breast cancer: overview of the evidence on breast imaging surveillanceNehmat Houssami0Nariya Cho1 Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, KoreaThis work reviews the evidence on breast imaging for screening (surveillance) in women with a history of breast cancer (BC). Early detection of second BCs in these women improves their prognosis based on studies using mammography (usually with clinical examinations) for surveillance. Cohort studies have estimated that mammography surveillance has moderate sensitivity (65.4%) and good specificity (98.3%), and have shown that these women are at a higher risk of interval BC than age- and breast density-matched women without a history of BC. Studies of adjunct imaging (ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging) for surveillance that have reported detection and accuracy measures have generally shown that adjunct imaging detected more second BCs than mammography and added substantially to the amount of false-positive results; however, little evidence exists regarding screening efficacy of adjunct imaging as part of routine surveillance.http://www.e-ultrasonography.org/upload/usg-18017.pdfBreast neoplasmsMammographyMass screening
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nehmat Houssami
Nariya Cho
spellingShingle Nehmat Houssami
Nariya Cho
Screening women with a personal history of breast cancer: overview of the evidence on breast imaging surveillance
Ultrasonography
Breast neoplasms
Mammography
Mass screening
author_facet Nehmat Houssami
Nariya Cho
author_sort Nehmat Houssami
title Screening women with a personal history of breast cancer: overview of the evidence on breast imaging surveillance
title_short Screening women with a personal history of breast cancer: overview of the evidence on breast imaging surveillance
title_full Screening women with a personal history of breast cancer: overview of the evidence on breast imaging surveillance
title_fullStr Screening women with a personal history of breast cancer: overview of the evidence on breast imaging surveillance
title_full_unstemmed Screening women with a personal history of breast cancer: overview of the evidence on breast imaging surveillance
title_sort screening women with a personal history of breast cancer: overview of the evidence on breast imaging surveillance
publisher Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine
series Ultrasonography
issn 2288-5919
2288-5943
publishDate 2018-10-01
description This work reviews the evidence on breast imaging for screening (surveillance) in women with a history of breast cancer (BC). Early detection of second BCs in these women improves their prognosis based on studies using mammography (usually with clinical examinations) for surveillance. Cohort studies have estimated that mammography surveillance has moderate sensitivity (65.4%) and good specificity (98.3%), and have shown that these women are at a higher risk of interval BC than age- and breast density-matched women without a history of BC. Studies of adjunct imaging (ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging) for surveillance that have reported detection and accuracy measures have generally shown that adjunct imaging detected more second BCs than mammography and added substantially to the amount of false-positive results; however, little evidence exists regarding screening efficacy of adjunct imaging as part of routine surveillance.
topic Breast neoplasms
Mammography
Mass screening
url http://www.e-ultrasonography.org/upload/usg-18017.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nehmathoussami screeningwomenwithapersonalhistoryofbreastcanceroverviewoftheevidenceonbreastimagingsurveillance
AT nariyacho screeningwomenwithapersonalhistoryofbreastcanceroverviewoftheevidenceonbreastimagingsurveillance
_version_ 1724842671015460864