Genome-Wide Comparative Analysis of Chemosensory Gene Families in Five Tsetse Fly Species.

For decades, odour-baited traps have been used for control of tsetse flies (Diptera; Glossinidae), vectors of African trypanosomes. However, differential responses to known attractants have been reported in different Glossina species, hindering establishment of a universal vector control tool. Avail...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rosaline Macharia, Paul Mireji, Edwin Murungi, Grace Murilla, Alan Christoffels, Serap Aksoy, Daniel Masiga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-02-01
Series:PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4757090?pdf=render
id doaj-3441984bf2904f2ba5f606e9fa10315a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3441984bf2904f2ba5f606e9fa10315a2020-11-25T02:42:36ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases1935-27271935-27352016-02-01102e000442110.1371/journal.pntd.0004421Genome-Wide Comparative Analysis of Chemosensory Gene Families in Five Tsetse Fly Species.Rosaline MachariaPaul MirejiEdwin MurungiGrace MurillaAlan ChristoffelsSerap AksoyDaniel MasigaFor decades, odour-baited traps have been used for control of tsetse flies (Diptera; Glossinidae), vectors of African trypanosomes. However, differential responses to known attractants have been reported in different Glossina species, hindering establishment of a universal vector control tool. Availability of full genome sequences of five Glossina species offers an opportunity to compare their chemosensory repertoire and enhance our understanding of their biology in relation to chemosensation. Here, we identified and annotated the major chemosensory gene families in Glossina. We identified a total of 118, 115, 124, and 123 chemosensory genes in Glossina austeni, G. brevipalpis, G. f. fuscipes, G. pallidipes, respectively, relative to 127 reported in G. m. morsitans. Our results show that tsetse fly genomes have fewer chemosensory genes when compared to other dipterans such as Musca domestica (n>393), Drosophila melanogaster (n = 246) and Anopheles gambiae (n>247). We also found that Glossina chemosensory genes are dispersed across distantly located scaffolds in their respective genomes, in contrast to other insects like D. melanogaster whose genes occur in clusters. Further, Glossina appears to be devoid of sugar receptors and to have expanded CO2 associated receptors, potentially reflecting Glossina's obligate hematophagy and the need to detect hosts that may be out of sight. We also identified, in all species, homologs of Ir84a; a Drosophila-specific ionotropic receptor that promotes male courtship suggesting that this is a conserved trait in tsetse flies. Notably, our selection analysis revealed that a total of four gene loci (Gr21a, GluRIIA, Gr28b, and Obp83a) were under positive selection, which confers fitness advantage to species. These findings provide a platform for studies to further define the language of communication of tsetse with their environment, and influence development of novel approaches for control.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4757090?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rosaline Macharia
Paul Mireji
Edwin Murungi
Grace Murilla
Alan Christoffels
Serap Aksoy
Daniel Masiga
spellingShingle Rosaline Macharia
Paul Mireji
Edwin Murungi
Grace Murilla
Alan Christoffels
Serap Aksoy
Daniel Masiga
Genome-Wide Comparative Analysis of Chemosensory Gene Families in Five Tsetse Fly Species.
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
author_facet Rosaline Macharia
Paul Mireji
Edwin Murungi
Grace Murilla
Alan Christoffels
Serap Aksoy
Daniel Masiga
author_sort Rosaline Macharia
title Genome-Wide Comparative Analysis of Chemosensory Gene Families in Five Tsetse Fly Species.
title_short Genome-Wide Comparative Analysis of Chemosensory Gene Families in Five Tsetse Fly Species.
title_full Genome-Wide Comparative Analysis of Chemosensory Gene Families in Five Tsetse Fly Species.
title_fullStr Genome-Wide Comparative Analysis of Chemosensory Gene Families in Five Tsetse Fly Species.
title_full_unstemmed Genome-Wide Comparative Analysis of Chemosensory Gene Families in Five Tsetse Fly Species.
title_sort genome-wide comparative analysis of chemosensory gene families in five tsetse fly species.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
issn 1935-2727
1935-2735
publishDate 2016-02-01
description For decades, odour-baited traps have been used for control of tsetse flies (Diptera; Glossinidae), vectors of African trypanosomes. However, differential responses to known attractants have been reported in different Glossina species, hindering establishment of a universal vector control tool. Availability of full genome sequences of five Glossina species offers an opportunity to compare their chemosensory repertoire and enhance our understanding of their biology in relation to chemosensation. Here, we identified and annotated the major chemosensory gene families in Glossina. We identified a total of 118, 115, 124, and 123 chemosensory genes in Glossina austeni, G. brevipalpis, G. f. fuscipes, G. pallidipes, respectively, relative to 127 reported in G. m. morsitans. Our results show that tsetse fly genomes have fewer chemosensory genes when compared to other dipterans such as Musca domestica (n>393), Drosophila melanogaster (n = 246) and Anopheles gambiae (n>247). We also found that Glossina chemosensory genes are dispersed across distantly located scaffolds in their respective genomes, in contrast to other insects like D. melanogaster whose genes occur in clusters. Further, Glossina appears to be devoid of sugar receptors and to have expanded CO2 associated receptors, potentially reflecting Glossina's obligate hematophagy and the need to detect hosts that may be out of sight. We also identified, in all species, homologs of Ir84a; a Drosophila-specific ionotropic receptor that promotes male courtship suggesting that this is a conserved trait in tsetse flies. Notably, our selection analysis revealed that a total of four gene loci (Gr21a, GluRIIA, Gr28b, and Obp83a) were under positive selection, which confers fitness advantage to species. These findings provide a platform for studies to further define the language of communication of tsetse with their environment, and influence development of novel approaches for control.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4757090?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT rosalinemacharia genomewidecomparativeanalysisofchemosensorygenefamiliesinfivetsetseflyspecies
AT paulmireji genomewidecomparativeanalysisofchemosensorygenefamiliesinfivetsetseflyspecies
AT edwinmurungi genomewidecomparativeanalysisofchemosensorygenefamiliesinfivetsetseflyspecies
AT gracemurilla genomewidecomparativeanalysisofchemosensorygenefamiliesinfivetsetseflyspecies
AT alanchristoffels genomewidecomparativeanalysisofchemosensorygenefamiliesinfivetsetseflyspecies
AT serapaksoy genomewidecomparativeanalysisofchemosensorygenefamiliesinfivetsetseflyspecies
AT danielmasiga genomewidecomparativeanalysisofchemosensorygenefamiliesinfivetsetseflyspecies
_version_ 1724772753495556096