Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background and Aims</p> <p>As our population ages and life expectancy increases the number of people aged over 80 and more referred for cardiac surgery is growing. This study sought to identify the outcome of aortic valve replacement (AVR) in octogena...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dark John H, Aitchison James D, Bose Amal K
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2007-07-01
Series:Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Online Access:http://www.cardiothoracicsurgery.org/content/2/1/33
id doaj-34254065a7e7443dbabd680787f23d23
record_format Article
spelling doaj-34254065a7e7443dbabd680787f23d232020-11-25T02:09:17ZengBMCJournal of Cardiothoracic Surgery1749-80902007-07-01213310.1186/1749-8090-2-33Aortic valve replacement in octogenariansDark John HAitchison James DBose Amal K<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background and Aims</p> <p>As our population ages and life expectancy increases the number of people aged over 80 and more referred for cardiac surgery is growing. This study sought to identify the outcome of aortic valve replacement (AVR) in octogenarians.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>68 patients aged 80 years or more underwent AVR at the Freeman Hospital, between April 2001 and April 2004. A retrospective review of the notes and outcomes from the patients' GP and the NHS strategic tracking service was performed. 54% (37) underwent isolated AVR whilst 46% (31) underwent combined AVR and CABG.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Follow up was 100% complete. The mean age was 83.1 ± s.d. 2.9 years, a mean gradient of 83 ± s.d. 31 mmHg and mean AVA of 0.56 cm<sup>2</sup>. The mean additive EuroSCORE was 8.6 ± s.d. 1.2, the logistic EuroSCORE mean 12.0 ± s.d. 5.9. In hospital 30 day mortality was 13 %. Survival was 80% at 1 year and 78% at 2 years. Median follow up was for 712 days. Stepwise logistic regression identified chronic obstructive airways disease as an independent predictor of mortality (p < 0.05). Survival was not adversely affected by the addition of coronary artery bypass grafts to aortic valve replacement, the presence of peripheral vascular disease, hypertension or diabetes. In this study duration of cross clamp or bypass time were not found to reach significance as independent predictors of mortality.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our study demonstrates that the operative mortality for AVR in the over eighties is good, whilst the mid to long term outcome is excellent There is a very low attrition rate with those undergoing the procedure living as long than their age matched population. This study confirms AVR is a safe, acceptable treatment for octogenarians with excellent mid term outcomes.</p> http://www.cardiothoracicsurgery.org/content/2/1/33
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dark John H
Aitchison James D
Bose Amal K
spellingShingle Dark John H
Aitchison James D
Bose Amal K
Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
author_facet Dark John H
Aitchison James D
Bose Amal K
author_sort Dark John H
title Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians
title_short Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians
title_full Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians
title_fullStr Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians
title_full_unstemmed Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians
title_sort aortic valve replacement in octogenarians
publisher BMC
series Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
issn 1749-8090
publishDate 2007-07-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background and Aims</p> <p>As our population ages and life expectancy increases the number of people aged over 80 and more referred for cardiac surgery is growing. This study sought to identify the outcome of aortic valve replacement (AVR) in octogenarians.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>68 patients aged 80 years or more underwent AVR at the Freeman Hospital, between April 2001 and April 2004. A retrospective review of the notes and outcomes from the patients' GP and the NHS strategic tracking service was performed. 54% (37) underwent isolated AVR whilst 46% (31) underwent combined AVR and CABG.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Follow up was 100% complete. The mean age was 83.1 ± s.d. 2.9 years, a mean gradient of 83 ± s.d. 31 mmHg and mean AVA of 0.56 cm<sup>2</sup>. The mean additive EuroSCORE was 8.6 ± s.d. 1.2, the logistic EuroSCORE mean 12.0 ± s.d. 5.9. In hospital 30 day mortality was 13 %. Survival was 80% at 1 year and 78% at 2 years. Median follow up was for 712 days. Stepwise logistic regression identified chronic obstructive airways disease as an independent predictor of mortality (p < 0.05). Survival was not adversely affected by the addition of coronary artery bypass grafts to aortic valve replacement, the presence of peripheral vascular disease, hypertension or diabetes. In this study duration of cross clamp or bypass time were not found to reach significance as independent predictors of mortality.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our study demonstrates that the operative mortality for AVR in the over eighties is good, whilst the mid to long term outcome is excellent There is a very low attrition rate with those undergoing the procedure living as long than their age matched population. This study confirms AVR is a safe, acceptable treatment for octogenarians with excellent mid term outcomes.</p>
url http://www.cardiothoracicsurgery.org/content/2/1/33
work_keys_str_mv AT darkjohnh aorticvalvereplacementinoctogenarians
AT aitchisonjamesd aorticvalvereplacementinoctogenarians
AT boseamalk aorticvalvereplacementinoctogenarians
_version_ 1724924756014137344