Outcome assessment criteria and terminology should be consistent and reported clearly

Outcome assessment criteria and terminology should be consistent and reported clearly

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Lun Li, Jiong Wu
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Elsevier 2021-01-01
Series:	Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
Online Access:	http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0753332220312014

Similar Items

Technical Evaluation Report 7: Software Evaluation Criteria and Terminology
by: Diane Belyk, et al.
Published: (2002-04-01)

Validity and reliability of the simplified Chinese patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events
by: Shan-Shan Yang, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01)

Looking for a Consistent Terminology in European Contract Law
by: Barbara Pozzo
Published: (2020-07-01)

Basic Criteria for Terminology Selection in Compiling Lexicographic Model of Sociological Terminology in English
by: T A Maikova
Published: (2016-12-01)

Linguistic Validation of the US National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events in Korean
by: Juhee Cho, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01)

The consistent criteria of hypotheses
by: L. Aleksidze, et al.
Published: (2014-06-01)

Consistent and Clear Reporting of Results from Diverse Modeling Techniques: The A3 Method
by: Scott Fortmann-Roe
Published: (2015-08-01)

Should the Decisions of Institutional Review Boards Be Consistent?
by: Friesen, P., et al.
Published: (2019)

Routine Surveillance of Chemotherapy Toxicities in Cancer Patients Using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)
by: Tian Qi Wang, et al.
Published: (2018-10-01)

Dutch translation and linguistic validation of the U.S. National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE™)
by: Evalien Veldhuijzen, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01)

Japanese translation and linguistic validation of the US National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)
by: Tempei Miyaji, et al.
Published: (2017-12-01)

Assessing Software Cost Estimation Models: criteria for accuracy, consistency and regression
by: Bruce Lo, et al.
Published: (1997-11-01)

Terminology, criteria, and definitions in complex regional pain syndrome: challenges and solutions
by: Dutton K, et al.
Published: (2015-12-01)

Language planning and terminology management : assessment and dissemination of medical terminology in Jordan
by: Rababah, Hussein A. M.
Published: (2007)

The E-Design Assessment Tool: an evidence-informed approach towards a consistent terminology for quantifying online distance learning activities
by: Helen Walmsley-Smith, et al.
Published: (2019-02-01)

Introduction to Risk Assessment Terminology
by: Andrea Serraino
Published: (2014-02-01)

Establishing a common metric for patient-reported outcomes in cancer patients: linking patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS), numerical rating scale, and patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE)
by: Minji K. Lee, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01)

The Japanese version of the National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE): psychometric validation and discordance between clinician and patient assessments of adverse events
by: Takashi Kawaguchi, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

Teachers' Grading Practices: In Search for Clear Grading Criteria
by: Siti Zulaiha
Published: (2017-02-01)

Teachers' Grading Practices: In Search for Clear Grading Criteria
by: Siti Zulaiha
Published: (2017-01-01)

Correction to: Establishing a common metric for patient-reported outcomes in cancer patients: linking patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS), numerical rating scale, and patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE)
by: Minji K. Lee, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01)

Fieldwork and Public Archaeology (or: Why Even the Seemingly Clear Connections Should Be Examined?)
by: Tatjana Cvjetićanin
Published: (2019-11-01)

Classifications of good versus poor outcome following knee arthroplasty should not be defined using arbitrary criteria
by: Daniel L. Riddle, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01)

SYNONYMY AND TERMINOLOGICAL DOUBLET IN ECONOMIC TERMINOLOGY
by: Pllana, S., et al.
Published: (2020-09-01)

Accounting terminology and forms in forty annual reports
by: Schmitt, Ralph Peter
Published: (2016)

The Influence of Criteria Selection Method on Consistency of Pairwise Comparison
by: Vladimír Bureš, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01)

Takayasu Arteritis: Criteria for Surgical Intervention Should Not Be Ignored
by: A. H. Perera, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01)

Feasibility and acceptability of electronic symptom surveillance with clinician feedback using the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) in Danish prostate cancer patients
by: Christina Baeksted, et al.
Published: (2017-09-01)

Diagnosis of spondyloarthritis: should we need new criteria?
by: I. Z. Gaidukova, et al.
Published: (2015-03-01)

The consistency of outcome effect
by: Hancock, Alexander J.
Published: (2007)

Chapter 7 Ensuring Consistency and Accuracy of Legal Terms in Institutional Translation : The Role of Terminological Resources in International Organizations
by: Prieto Ramos, Fernando
Published: (2021)

DIAGNOSTIC AND CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA IN RHEUMATOLOGY: WHEN SHOULD THE CRITERIA BE USED AND HOW DO THEY DIFFER?
by: Yu. V. Muravyev
Published: (2017-03-01)

MEDIATION TERMINOLOGY AS A SECONDARY TERMINOLOGICAL SYSTEM
by: Vyushkina, E.G., et al.
Published: (2017-03-01)

Terminological synonyms in Czech and English sports terminologies
by: Michaela Cocca, et al.
Published: (2016-11-01)

Why Most Psychologists Should Assess and Report Personality
by: Adelson Pinon
Published: (2019-08-01)

Glossary of ecosystem services mapping and assessment terminology
by: Marion Potschin-Young, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01)

Cryptorchidism: a comprehensive assessment of the terminology and classification
by: V. V. Sizonov, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01)

What Should an Ideal Adult Spinal Deformity Classification System Consist of?: Review of the Factors Affecting Outcomes of Adult Spinal Deformity Management
by: J. Naresh-Babu, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01)

Consistency of Term <i>star</i>: a Statistical Analysis of the Productive Types of System Relations with Related Terminological Units
by: M. N. Latu, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01)

Classification Terminology and Definitions in Reporting of MRI in Axial Spondyloarthritis
by: Danishta Ramdin, et al.
Published: (2017-12-01)