Imaging Patterns in MRI in Recent Bone Injuries Following Negative or Inconclusive Plain Radiographs

• Main Authors: Raghu Teja Sadineni, Ashirwad Pasumarthy, Narayan Chander Bellapa, Sandeep Velicheti
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2015-10-01
• Series: Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
• Subjects: bone contusions; bone marrow edema; mri of fractures; occult bone injuries
• Online Access: https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/6685/15451_CE(RA1)_F(T)_PF1(EKAK)_PFA(AK)_PF2(PAG).pdf

Background: Few bony injuries and most soft tissue injuries cannot be detected on plain radiography. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can detect such occult bony injuries due to signal changes in bone marrow. In addition to excluding serious bony injuries, it can also identify tendon, ligament, cartilage and other soft tissue injuries and thus help in localizing the cause of morbidity. Aims and Objectives: To determine the MRI imaging patterns in recent bone injuries (less than 4 weeks) following negative or inconclusive plain radiographs. To determine the role of MRI in recent fractures. Results: Out of the 75 individuals with history of recent injury of less than 4 weeks duration, fracture line was demonstrated in 16 patients (21%) who had no obvious evidence of bone injury on plain radiographs. Bone contusion or bruising of the bone was demonstrated in 39 (52%) patients. This was the commonest abnormality detected in MRI. The remaining 20 patients did not show any obvious injury to the bone on MR imaging however, soft tissue injury could be demonstrated in 12 (16%) patients which show that the extent of soft tissue injury was relatively well demonstrated by MR imaging. The present study showed that occult injuries commonly occur at the Knee followed by Ankle, Wrist, Foot, Elbow, Leg, Hands, Hips & Spine. Conclusion: The study showed that MR is efficient in the detection of occult bone injuries which are missed on radiography. Compared to radiographs, MRI clearly depicted the extent of injuries and associated soft tissue involvement. MRI demonstrates both acute and chronic injuries and also differentiates both, whereas radiography has poor sensitivity for acute injuries. Also, the soft tissue injuries like tendionous and ligamentous injuries cannot be identified on radiographs.