Reflections on Some Aspects of the Jurisdiction of the Federal High Court under the Nigerian 1979 and 1999 Constitutions: One or More High Courts?

This research makes enquiries on the jurisdictional conflicts under the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria. The central issues in the jurisdictional conflicts under CFRN are two-fold. They are: whether the Federal High Court has jurisdiction in all cases involving the Federal Government or any of its a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Taiwo Osiptan, Abiodun Odusote
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Danubius University 2016-11-01
Series:Acta Universitatis Danubius: Juridica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/juridica/article/view/3656/3697
id doaj-340569c816bb4ff2a9852c183d9e63bf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-340569c816bb4ff2a9852c183d9e63bf2021-10-02T09:09:57ZengDanubius UniversityActa Universitatis Danubius: Juridica1844-80622065-38912016-11-01123530Reflections on Some Aspects of the Jurisdiction of the Federal High Court under the Nigerian 1979 and 1999 Constitutions: One or More High Courts?Taiwo Osiptan0Abiodun Odusote1University of LagosUniversity of LagosThis research makes enquiries on the jurisdictional conflicts under the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria. The central issues in the jurisdictional conflicts under CFRN are two-fold. They are: whether the Federal High Court has jurisdiction in all cases involving the Federal Government or any of its agencies, irrespective of the subject matter of the case or whether the jurisdiction conferred on the Federal High Court is exclusive to the Court or is concurrently shared with other High Courts. A related problem is whether the jurisdiction conferred on the Federal High Court is restricted to those specific causes, listed in Section 251 or extends to all matters within the legislative competence of the National Assembly. The interpretation and application of this provision have generated, and continues to generate the jurisdictional crisis. The conflicts have further deepened with the recognition of the National Industrial Court as a Court of co-ordinate status as the Federal and State High Courts. This paper examines some of the jurisdictional conflicts which have arisen in the jurisprudence of these courts. The problems associated with adoption of dual system of High Courts are thereafter examined. The paper ends with a discourse on the desirability of one or two or three High Courts within the Nigerian judicial system. The paper concludes that the existence of three High Courts within the Nation’s judicature raises question of desirability or otherwise of more than one High Court in a judicature which has only one Court of Appeal and only one Apex Court which entertains appeals from the three trial Courts. In the final analysis, the paper makes a proposal for the merger of all trial courts to form a National High Court or High Court of the Federation.http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/juridica/article/view/3656/3697Jurisdictional conflicts; Federal High Court; State High Court; National Industrial Court; Exclusive List
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Taiwo Osiptan
Abiodun Odusote
spellingShingle Taiwo Osiptan
Abiodun Odusote
Reflections on Some Aspects of the Jurisdiction of the Federal High Court under the Nigerian 1979 and 1999 Constitutions: One or More High Courts?
Acta Universitatis Danubius: Juridica
Jurisdictional conflicts; Federal High Court; State High Court; National Industrial Court; Exclusive List
author_facet Taiwo Osiptan
Abiodun Odusote
author_sort Taiwo Osiptan
title Reflections on Some Aspects of the Jurisdiction of the Federal High Court under the Nigerian 1979 and 1999 Constitutions: One or More High Courts?
title_short Reflections on Some Aspects of the Jurisdiction of the Federal High Court under the Nigerian 1979 and 1999 Constitutions: One or More High Courts?
title_full Reflections on Some Aspects of the Jurisdiction of the Federal High Court under the Nigerian 1979 and 1999 Constitutions: One or More High Courts?
title_fullStr Reflections on Some Aspects of the Jurisdiction of the Federal High Court under the Nigerian 1979 and 1999 Constitutions: One or More High Courts?
title_full_unstemmed Reflections on Some Aspects of the Jurisdiction of the Federal High Court under the Nigerian 1979 and 1999 Constitutions: One or More High Courts?
title_sort reflections on some aspects of the jurisdiction of the federal high court under the nigerian 1979 and 1999 constitutions: one or more high courts?
publisher Danubius University
series Acta Universitatis Danubius: Juridica
issn 1844-8062
2065-3891
publishDate 2016-11-01
description This research makes enquiries on the jurisdictional conflicts under the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria. The central issues in the jurisdictional conflicts under CFRN are two-fold. They are: whether the Federal High Court has jurisdiction in all cases involving the Federal Government or any of its agencies, irrespective of the subject matter of the case or whether the jurisdiction conferred on the Federal High Court is exclusive to the Court or is concurrently shared with other High Courts. A related problem is whether the jurisdiction conferred on the Federal High Court is restricted to those specific causes, listed in Section 251 or extends to all matters within the legislative competence of the National Assembly. The interpretation and application of this provision have generated, and continues to generate the jurisdictional crisis. The conflicts have further deepened with the recognition of the National Industrial Court as a Court of co-ordinate status as the Federal and State High Courts. This paper examines some of the jurisdictional conflicts which have arisen in the jurisprudence of these courts. The problems associated with adoption of dual system of High Courts are thereafter examined. The paper ends with a discourse on the desirability of one or two or three High Courts within the Nigerian judicial system. The paper concludes that the existence of three High Courts within the Nation’s judicature raises question of desirability or otherwise of more than one High Court in a judicature which has only one Court of Appeal and only one Apex Court which entertains appeals from the three trial Courts. In the final analysis, the paper makes a proposal for the merger of all trial courts to form a National High Court or High Court of the Federation.
topic Jurisdictional conflicts; Federal High Court; State High Court; National Industrial Court; Exclusive List
url http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/juridica/article/view/3656/3697
work_keys_str_mv AT taiwoosiptan reflectionsonsomeaspectsofthejurisdictionofthefederalhighcourtunderthenigerian1979and1999constitutionsoneormorehighcourts
AT abiodunodusote reflectionsonsomeaspectsofthejurisdictionofthefederalhighcourtunderthenigerian1979and1999constitutionsoneormorehighcourts
_version_ 1716856672101597184