A concise review of updated guidelines regarding the management of hepatocellular carcinoma around the world: 2010-2016

Many guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have been published and updated globally. In contrast to other cancers, there is a range of treatment options for HCC involving several multidisciplinary care of the patient. Consequently, enormous heterogeneity in management trends has been observe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Su Jong Yu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Association for the Study of the Liver 2016-03-01
Series:Clinical and Molecular Hepatology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://e-cmh.org/upload/pdf/cmh-22-1-7.pdf
id doaj-3403223285ec47d1b59710bca1d843ce
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3403223285ec47d1b59710bca1d843ce2020-11-24T23:22:37ZengKorean Association for the Study of the LiverClinical and Molecular Hepatology2287-27282287-285X2016-03-0122171710.3350/cmh.2016.22.1.71279A concise review of updated guidelines regarding the management of hepatocellular carcinoma around the world: 2010-2016Su Jong YuMany guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have been published and updated globally. In contrast to other cancers, there is a range of treatment options for HCC involving several multidisciplinary care of the patient. Consequently, enormous heterogeneity in management trends has been observed. To support standard care for HCC, we systematically appraised 8 current guidelines for HCC around the world, including 3 guidelines from Asia, 2 from Europe, and 3 from the United States according to the selection criteria of credibility influence and multi-faceted. After a systematic appraisal, we found that these guidelines have both similarities and dissimilarities in terms of surveillance and treatment allocation recommendations due to regional differences in disease and other variables (diagnosis, staging systems) secondary to the lack of a solid, high level of evidence. In contrast to other tumors, the geographic differences in tumor biology (i.e., areas of increased hepatitis B prevalence) and available resources (organ availability for transplantation, medical technology, accessibility to treatment, health systems, and health resources) make it impractical to have an internationally universal guideline for all patients with HCC. Although Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) has long been dominant system for treatment-guiding staging of HCC, many Asia-pacific experts do not fully agree with its principle. The concepts of BCLC, for surgical resection or other locoregional therapy, are considered too conservative. Asian guidelines represent consensus about surgical resection and TACE indication for more advanced tumor.http://e-cmh.org/upload/pdf/cmh-22-1-7.pdfHepatocellular carcinomaGuideline
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Su Jong Yu
spellingShingle Su Jong Yu
A concise review of updated guidelines regarding the management of hepatocellular carcinoma around the world: 2010-2016
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Guideline
author_facet Su Jong Yu
author_sort Su Jong Yu
title A concise review of updated guidelines regarding the management of hepatocellular carcinoma around the world: 2010-2016
title_short A concise review of updated guidelines regarding the management of hepatocellular carcinoma around the world: 2010-2016
title_full A concise review of updated guidelines regarding the management of hepatocellular carcinoma around the world: 2010-2016
title_fullStr A concise review of updated guidelines regarding the management of hepatocellular carcinoma around the world: 2010-2016
title_full_unstemmed A concise review of updated guidelines regarding the management of hepatocellular carcinoma around the world: 2010-2016
title_sort concise review of updated guidelines regarding the management of hepatocellular carcinoma around the world: 2010-2016
publisher Korean Association for the Study of the Liver
series Clinical and Molecular Hepatology
issn 2287-2728
2287-285X
publishDate 2016-03-01
description Many guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have been published and updated globally. In contrast to other cancers, there is a range of treatment options for HCC involving several multidisciplinary care of the patient. Consequently, enormous heterogeneity in management trends has been observed. To support standard care for HCC, we systematically appraised 8 current guidelines for HCC around the world, including 3 guidelines from Asia, 2 from Europe, and 3 from the United States according to the selection criteria of credibility influence and multi-faceted. After a systematic appraisal, we found that these guidelines have both similarities and dissimilarities in terms of surveillance and treatment allocation recommendations due to regional differences in disease and other variables (diagnosis, staging systems) secondary to the lack of a solid, high level of evidence. In contrast to other tumors, the geographic differences in tumor biology (i.e., areas of increased hepatitis B prevalence) and available resources (organ availability for transplantation, medical technology, accessibility to treatment, health systems, and health resources) make it impractical to have an internationally universal guideline for all patients with HCC. Although Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) has long been dominant system for treatment-guiding staging of HCC, many Asia-pacific experts do not fully agree with its principle. The concepts of BCLC, for surgical resection or other locoregional therapy, are considered too conservative. Asian guidelines represent consensus about surgical resection and TACE indication for more advanced tumor.
topic Hepatocellular carcinoma
Guideline
url http://e-cmh.org/upload/pdf/cmh-22-1-7.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sujongyu aconcisereviewofupdatedguidelinesregardingthemanagementofhepatocellularcarcinomaaroundtheworld20102016
AT sujongyu concisereviewofupdatedguidelinesregardingthemanagementofhepatocellularcarcinomaaroundtheworld20102016
_version_ 1725567235111518208