Suction catheter guided insertion of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: Experience by untrained physicians

Background: The use of suction catheter (SC) has been shown to improve success rate during ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) insertion in expert users. Aims: The aim of this study was to compare insertion of PLMA performed by untrained physicians using a SC or the digital technique (DT) in anaest...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Valter Perilli, Paola Aceto, Teresa Sacco, Nunzia Martella, Maria Teresa Cazzato, Liliana Sollazzi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2014-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2014;volume=58;issue=1;spage=25;epage=29;aulast=Perilli
id doaj-33f81bd0da69436c8e1cd91cc95caeec
record_format Article
spelling doaj-33f81bd0da69436c8e1cd91cc95caeec2020-11-24T21:06:57ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Anaesthesia0019-50492014-01-01581252910.4103/0019-5049.126784Suction catheter guided insertion of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: Experience by untrained physiciansValter PerilliPaola AcetoTeresa SaccoNunzia MartellaMaria Teresa CazzatoLiliana SollazziBackground: The use of suction catheter (SC) has been shown to improve success rate during ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) insertion in expert users. Aims: The aim of this study was to compare insertion of PLMA performed by untrained physicians using a SC or the digital technique (DT) in anaesthetised non-paralysed patients. Methods: In this prospective randomised double-blind study, conducted in the operating setting, 254 patients (American Society of Anaesthesiologists I-II, aged 18-65 years), undergoing minor surgery were enrolled. Exclusion criteria were body mass index >35 kg/m 2 , laryngeal or oesophageal varices, risk of aspiration or difficult face mask ventilation either referred or suspected (Langeron′s criteria ≥2) and modified Mallampati classification score >2. Participants were randomly allocated to one of the two groups in which PLMA was inserted using DT (DT-group) or SC (SC-group). Statistical Analysis: Chi-square test with Yates′ correction, Mann-Whitney U-test or Student′s t-test were carried-out as appropriate. Results: The final insertion success rate was greater in SC-groupcompared with DT-group 90.1% (n = 109) versus 74.4% (n = 99) respectively (P = 0.002). Mean airway leak pressure was higher in SC-group compared to DT-group (23.7 ± 3.9 vs. 21.4 ± 3.2 respectively; (P = 0.001). There were no differences in insertion time, post-operative airway morbidity and complications. Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that SC-technique improves the success rate of PLMA insertion by untrained physicians.http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2014;volume=58;issue=1;spage=25;epage=29;aulast=PerilliDigital techniqueProSeal laryngeal mask airwaysuction catheter techniqueuntrained physicians
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Valter Perilli
Paola Aceto
Teresa Sacco
Nunzia Martella
Maria Teresa Cazzato
Liliana Sollazzi
spellingShingle Valter Perilli
Paola Aceto
Teresa Sacco
Nunzia Martella
Maria Teresa Cazzato
Liliana Sollazzi
Suction catheter guided insertion of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: Experience by untrained physicians
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
Digital technique
ProSeal laryngeal mask airway
suction catheter technique
untrained physicians
author_facet Valter Perilli
Paola Aceto
Teresa Sacco
Nunzia Martella
Maria Teresa Cazzato
Liliana Sollazzi
author_sort Valter Perilli
title Suction catheter guided insertion of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: Experience by untrained physicians
title_short Suction catheter guided insertion of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: Experience by untrained physicians
title_full Suction catheter guided insertion of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: Experience by untrained physicians
title_fullStr Suction catheter guided insertion of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: Experience by untrained physicians
title_full_unstemmed Suction catheter guided insertion of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: Experience by untrained physicians
title_sort suction catheter guided insertion of proseal laryngeal mask airway: experience by untrained physicians
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
issn 0019-5049
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Background: The use of suction catheter (SC) has been shown to improve success rate during ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) insertion in expert users. Aims: The aim of this study was to compare insertion of PLMA performed by untrained physicians using a SC or the digital technique (DT) in anaesthetised non-paralysed patients. Methods: In this prospective randomised double-blind study, conducted in the operating setting, 254 patients (American Society of Anaesthesiologists I-II, aged 18-65 years), undergoing minor surgery were enrolled. Exclusion criteria were body mass index >35 kg/m 2 , laryngeal or oesophageal varices, risk of aspiration or difficult face mask ventilation either referred or suspected (Langeron′s criteria ≥2) and modified Mallampati classification score >2. Participants were randomly allocated to one of the two groups in which PLMA was inserted using DT (DT-group) or SC (SC-group). Statistical Analysis: Chi-square test with Yates′ correction, Mann-Whitney U-test or Student′s t-test were carried-out as appropriate. Results: The final insertion success rate was greater in SC-groupcompared with DT-group 90.1% (n = 109) versus 74.4% (n = 99) respectively (P = 0.002). Mean airway leak pressure was higher in SC-group compared to DT-group (23.7 ± 3.9 vs. 21.4 ± 3.2 respectively; (P = 0.001). There were no differences in insertion time, post-operative airway morbidity and complications. Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that SC-technique improves the success rate of PLMA insertion by untrained physicians.
topic Digital technique
ProSeal laryngeal mask airway
suction catheter technique
untrained physicians
url http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2014;volume=58;issue=1;spage=25;epage=29;aulast=Perilli
work_keys_str_mv AT valterperilli suctioncatheterguidedinsertionofproseallaryngealmaskairwayexperiencebyuntrainedphysicians
AT paolaaceto suctioncatheterguidedinsertionofproseallaryngealmaskairwayexperiencebyuntrainedphysicians
AT teresasacco suctioncatheterguidedinsertionofproseallaryngealmaskairwayexperiencebyuntrainedphysicians
AT nunziamartella suctioncatheterguidedinsertionofproseallaryngealmaskairwayexperiencebyuntrainedphysicians
AT mariateresacazzato suctioncatheterguidedinsertionofproseallaryngealmaskairwayexperiencebyuntrainedphysicians
AT lilianasollazzi suctioncatheterguidedinsertionofproseallaryngealmaskairwayexperiencebyuntrainedphysicians
_version_ 1716764189213589504