Multiple regression in fertility and family formation

Background: In the present study, attempt has been made to study the determinants of total fertility rate (TFR), by developing the model for TFR so to use TFR determinants for Family Welfare Planning and Programme implementation. Methodology: Principal component analysis was carried out to study the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anushri Pradip Patil, Naresh Kumar Tyagi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2017-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Health Sciences and Biomedical Research KLEU
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijournalhs.org/article.asp?issn=2542-6214;year=2017;volume=10;issue=3;spage=237;epage=240;aulast=Patil
id doaj-33e97760d7ca4e678178b665bfabab78
record_format Article
spelling doaj-33e97760d7ca4e678178b665bfabab782020-11-24T23:58:42ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Health Sciences and Biomedical Research KLEU2542-62142542-62222017-01-0110323724010.4103/kleuhsj.kleuhsj_116_17Multiple regression in fertility and family formationAnushri Pradip PatilNaresh Kumar TyagiBackground: In the present study, attempt has been made to study the determinants of total fertility rate (TFR), by developing the model for TFR so to use TFR determinants for Family Welfare Planning and Programme implementation. Methodology: Principal component analysis was carried out to study the correlates of TFR of Indian states. Further, regression analysis was carried out to estimate TFR, using relevant determinants by studying its correlates and principal components. Results: Two principal components were: (i) “Social Status of Women” explaining 58% of variation comprised “infant mortality rate” with correlation coefficient (−0.95), “Percentage of Literacy of Female” (0.94), “Life Expectancy at Birth” (0.93), “Age at Marriage of Women” (−0.90), and (ii) “Fertility Index” with 20% of variation explained, comprised “Employment Status of Female” (0.762) and “Desire of no more child after Two Living Children” (−0.759). The regression model for TFR with the coefficient of determination (0.466), using desire of no more child after Two Living Children was arrived, with utility to enhance health education and communication to achieve ideal family formation behavior. All Indian states were classified by the regression model (TFR = 3.58–0.019* “Desire of no more child after Two Living Children”) within 68% confidence interval except two states Mizoram and Meghalaya. Conclusions: 'Desire of no more children after two living Children's' has come out the main stay of family formation behavior. Hence, making realize the value of small family size with health education will stabilize the population.http://www.ijournalhs.org/article.asp?issn=2542-6214;year=2017;volume=10;issue=3;spage=237;epage=240;aulast=PatilMultiple regression analysisprincipal component analysistotal fertility rate
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anushri Pradip Patil
Naresh Kumar Tyagi
spellingShingle Anushri Pradip Patil
Naresh Kumar Tyagi
Multiple regression in fertility and family formation
Indian Journal of Health Sciences and Biomedical Research KLEU
Multiple regression analysis
principal component analysis
total fertility rate
author_facet Anushri Pradip Patil
Naresh Kumar Tyagi
author_sort Anushri Pradip Patil
title Multiple regression in fertility and family formation
title_short Multiple regression in fertility and family formation
title_full Multiple regression in fertility and family formation
title_fullStr Multiple regression in fertility and family formation
title_full_unstemmed Multiple regression in fertility and family formation
title_sort multiple regression in fertility and family formation
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Health Sciences and Biomedical Research KLEU
issn 2542-6214
2542-6222
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Background: In the present study, attempt has been made to study the determinants of total fertility rate (TFR), by developing the model for TFR so to use TFR determinants for Family Welfare Planning and Programme implementation. Methodology: Principal component analysis was carried out to study the correlates of TFR of Indian states. Further, regression analysis was carried out to estimate TFR, using relevant determinants by studying its correlates and principal components. Results: Two principal components were: (i) “Social Status of Women” explaining 58% of variation comprised “infant mortality rate” with correlation coefficient (−0.95), “Percentage of Literacy of Female” (0.94), “Life Expectancy at Birth” (0.93), “Age at Marriage of Women” (−0.90), and (ii) “Fertility Index” with 20% of variation explained, comprised “Employment Status of Female” (0.762) and “Desire of no more child after Two Living Children” (−0.759). The regression model for TFR with the coefficient of determination (0.466), using desire of no more child after Two Living Children was arrived, with utility to enhance health education and communication to achieve ideal family formation behavior. All Indian states were classified by the regression model (TFR = 3.58–0.019* “Desire of no more child after Two Living Children”) within 68% confidence interval except two states Mizoram and Meghalaya. Conclusions: 'Desire of no more children after two living Children's' has come out the main stay of family formation behavior. Hence, making realize the value of small family size with health education will stabilize the population.
topic Multiple regression analysis
principal component analysis
total fertility rate
url http://www.ijournalhs.org/article.asp?issn=2542-6214;year=2017;volume=10;issue=3;spage=237;epage=240;aulast=Patil
work_keys_str_mv AT anushripradippatil multipleregressioninfertilityandfamilyformation
AT nareshkumartyagi multipleregressioninfertilityandfamilyformation
_version_ 1725450210698592256