Inferring predator behavior from attack rates on prey-replicas that differ in conspicuousness.

Behavioral ecologists and evolutionary biologists have long studied how predators respond to prey items novel in color and pattern. Because a predatory response is influenced by both the predator's ability to detect the prey and a post-detection behavioral response, variation among prey types i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yoel E Stuart, Nathan Dappen, Neil Losin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3485355?pdf=render
id doaj-33e651896a964a02a3954dbe7193476f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-33e651896a964a02a3954dbe7193476f2020-11-24T20:40:21ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-01710e4849710.1371/journal.pone.0048497Inferring predator behavior from attack rates on prey-replicas that differ in conspicuousness.Yoel E StuartNathan DappenNeil LosinBehavioral ecologists and evolutionary biologists have long studied how predators respond to prey items novel in color and pattern. Because a predatory response is influenced by both the predator's ability to detect the prey and a post-detection behavioral response, variation among prey types in conspicuousness may confound inference about post-prey-detection predator behavior. That is, a relatively high attack rate on a given prey type may result primarily from enhanced conspicuousness and not predators' direct preference for that prey. Few studies, however, account for such variation in conspicuousness. In a field experiment, we measured predation rates on clay replicas of two aposematic forms of the poison dart frog Dendrobates pumilio, one novel and one familiar, and two cryptic controls. To ask whether predators prefer or avoid a novel aposematic prey form independently of conspicuousness differences among replicas, we first modeled the visual system of a typical avian predator. Then, we used this model to estimate replica contrast against a leaf litter background to test whether variation in contrast alone could explain variation in predator attack rate. We found that absolute predation rates did not differ among color forms. Predation rates relative to conspicuousness did, however, deviate significantly from expectation, suggesting that predators do make post-detection decisions to avoid or attack a given prey type. The direction of this deviation from expectation, though, depended on assumptions we made about how avian predators discriminate objects from the visual background. Our results show that it is important to account for prey conspicuousness when investigating predator behavior and also that existing models of predator visual systems need to be refined.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3485355?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yoel E Stuart
Nathan Dappen
Neil Losin
spellingShingle Yoel E Stuart
Nathan Dappen
Neil Losin
Inferring predator behavior from attack rates on prey-replicas that differ in conspicuousness.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Yoel E Stuart
Nathan Dappen
Neil Losin
author_sort Yoel E Stuart
title Inferring predator behavior from attack rates on prey-replicas that differ in conspicuousness.
title_short Inferring predator behavior from attack rates on prey-replicas that differ in conspicuousness.
title_full Inferring predator behavior from attack rates on prey-replicas that differ in conspicuousness.
title_fullStr Inferring predator behavior from attack rates on prey-replicas that differ in conspicuousness.
title_full_unstemmed Inferring predator behavior from attack rates on prey-replicas that differ in conspicuousness.
title_sort inferring predator behavior from attack rates on prey-replicas that differ in conspicuousness.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Behavioral ecologists and evolutionary biologists have long studied how predators respond to prey items novel in color and pattern. Because a predatory response is influenced by both the predator's ability to detect the prey and a post-detection behavioral response, variation among prey types in conspicuousness may confound inference about post-prey-detection predator behavior. That is, a relatively high attack rate on a given prey type may result primarily from enhanced conspicuousness and not predators' direct preference for that prey. Few studies, however, account for such variation in conspicuousness. In a field experiment, we measured predation rates on clay replicas of two aposematic forms of the poison dart frog Dendrobates pumilio, one novel and one familiar, and two cryptic controls. To ask whether predators prefer or avoid a novel aposematic prey form independently of conspicuousness differences among replicas, we first modeled the visual system of a typical avian predator. Then, we used this model to estimate replica contrast against a leaf litter background to test whether variation in contrast alone could explain variation in predator attack rate. We found that absolute predation rates did not differ among color forms. Predation rates relative to conspicuousness did, however, deviate significantly from expectation, suggesting that predators do make post-detection decisions to avoid or attack a given prey type. The direction of this deviation from expectation, though, depended on assumptions we made about how avian predators discriminate objects from the visual background. Our results show that it is important to account for prey conspicuousness when investigating predator behavior and also that existing models of predator visual systems need to be refined.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3485355?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT yoelestuart inferringpredatorbehaviorfromattackratesonpreyreplicasthatdifferinconspicuousness
AT nathandappen inferringpredatorbehaviorfromattackratesonpreyreplicasthatdifferinconspicuousness
AT neillosin inferringpredatorbehaviorfromattackratesonpreyreplicasthatdifferinconspicuousness
_version_ 1716827268772265984