Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with rare disease

Abstract Background There has been a growing emphasis on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as an important outcome in rare disease drug development, although its assessment may be useful outside the drug development context, including in clinical applications or natural history studies. Central...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: William R. Lenderking, Milena Anatchkova, Robin Pokrzywinski, Anne Skalicky, Mona L. Martin, Heather Gelhorn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2021-07-01
Series:Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Subjects:
FDA
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-021-00336-8
id doaj-33e20763b7ad4099b3574a7557381c8e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-33e20763b7ad4099b3574a7557381c8e2021-07-25T11:32:36ZengSpringerOpenJournal of Patient-Reported Outcomes2509-80202021-07-01511710.1186/s41687-021-00336-8Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with rare diseaseWilliam R. Lenderking0Milena Anatchkova1Robin Pokrzywinski2Anne Skalicky3Mona L. Martin4Heather Gelhorn5Patient-centered Research, EvideraPatient-centered Research, EvideraPatient-centered Research, EvideraPatient-centered Research, EvideraPatient-centered Research, EvideraPatient-centered Research, EvideraAbstract Background There has been a growing emphasis on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as an important outcome in rare disease drug development, although its assessment may be useful outside the drug development context, including in clinical applications or natural history studies. Central to assessing quality of life in health research is utilizing outcome measures that capture symptoms and impacts of the disease and treatment that are important and relevant to patients. Identifying and implementing valid and reliable tools to measure HRQoL in rare diseases poses unique challenges that often require creative solutions. Main body In this commentary, we explore some of the challenges in HRQoL assessment in rare disease, propose solutions, and consider regulatory issues. Some of the solutions discussed entail the use of item banks, adapting existing measures from phenotypically similar disease contexts, use of multi-domain measurement indices, and adapting methods for assessing content validity of existing measures. Current regulatory considerations are discussed and resources outlined. Conclusion Quality of life may be the most important endpoint for patients with rare diseases, and the challenges of valid assessment require effort and innovative thinking specific to each context to improve measurement and clinical outcomes.https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-021-00336-8Rare diseaseHRQoLClinical outcome assessment (COA)Item banksMeasure adaptationFDA
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author William R. Lenderking
Milena Anatchkova
Robin Pokrzywinski
Anne Skalicky
Mona L. Martin
Heather Gelhorn
spellingShingle William R. Lenderking
Milena Anatchkova
Robin Pokrzywinski
Anne Skalicky
Mona L. Martin
Heather Gelhorn
Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with rare disease
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Rare disease
HRQoL
Clinical outcome assessment (COA)
Item banks
Measure adaptation
FDA
author_facet William R. Lenderking
Milena Anatchkova
Robin Pokrzywinski
Anne Skalicky
Mona L. Martin
Heather Gelhorn
author_sort William R. Lenderking
title Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with rare disease
title_short Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with rare disease
title_full Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with rare disease
title_fullStr Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with rare disease
title_full_unstemmed Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with rare disease
title_sort measuring health-related quality of life in patients with rare disease
publisher SpringerOpen
series Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
issn 2509-8020
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Abstract Background There has been a growing emphasis on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as an important outcome in rare disease drug development, although its assessment may be useful outside the drug development context, including in clinical applications or natural history studies. Central to assessing quality of life in health research is utilizing outcome measures that capture symptoms and impacts of the disease and treatment that are important and relevant to patients. Identifying and implementing valid and reliable tools to measure HRQoL in rare diseases poses unique challenges that often require creative solutions. Main body In this commentary, we explore some of the challenges in HRQoL assessment in rare disease, propose solutions, and consider regulatory issues. Some of the solutions discussed entail the use of item banks, adapting existing measures from phenotypically similar disease contexts, use of multi-domain measurement indices, and adapting methods for assessing content validity of existing measures. Current regulatory considerations are discussed and resources outlined. Conclusion Quality of life may be the most important endpoint for patients with rare diseases, and the challenges of valid assessment require effort and innovative thinking specific to each context to improve measurement and clinical outcomes.
topic Rare disease
HRQoL
Clinical outcome assessment (COA)
Item banks
Measure adaptation
FDA
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-021-00336-8
work_keys_str_mv AT williamrlenderking measuringhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithraredisease
AT milenaanatchkova measuringhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithraredisease
AT robinpokrzywinski measuringhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithraredisease
AT anneskalicky measuringhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithraredisease
AT monalmartin measuringhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithraredisease
AT heathergelhorn measuringhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithraredisease
_version_ 1721283059413680128