Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with rare disease
Abstract Background There has been a growing emphasis on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as an important outcome in rare disease drug development, although its assessment may be useful outside the drug development context, including in clinical applications or natural history studies. Central...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2021-07-01
|
Series: | Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-021-00336-8 |
id |
doaj-33e20763b7ad4099b3574a7557381c8e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-33e20763b7ad4099b3574a7557381c8e2021-07-25T11:32:36ZengSpringerOpenJournal of Patient-Reported Outcomes2509-80202021-07-01511710.1186/s41687-021-00336-8Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with rare diseaseWilliam R. Lenderking0Milena Anatchkova1Robin Pokrzywinski2Anne Skalicky3Mona L. Martin4Heather Gelhorn5Patient-centered Research, EvideraPatient-centered Research, EvideraPatient-centered Research, EvideraPatient-centered Research, EvideraPatient-centered Research, EvideraPatient-centered Research, EvideraAbstract Background There has been a growing emphasis on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as an important outcome in rare disease drug development, although its assessment may be useful outside the drug development context, including in clinical applications or natural history studies. Central to assessing quality of life in health research is utilizing outcome measures that capture symptoms and impacts of the disease and treatment that are important and relevant to patients. Identifying and implementing valid and reliable tools to measure HRQoL in rare diseases poses unique challenges that often require creative solutions. Main body In this commentary, we explore some of the challenges in HRQoL assessment in rare disease, propose solutions, and consider regulatory issues. Some of the solutions discussed entail the use of item banks, adapting existing measures from phenotypically similar disease contexts, use of multi-domain measurement indices, and adapting methods for assessing content validity of existing measures. Current regulatory considerations are discussed and resources outlined. Conclusion Quality of life may be the most important endpoint for patients with rare diseases, and the challenges of valid assessment require effort and innovative thinking specific to each context to improve measurement and clinical outcomes.https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-021-00336-8Rare diseaseHRQoLClinical outcome assessment (COA)Item banksMeasure adaptationFDA |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
William R. Lenderking Milena Anatchkova Robin Pokrzywinski Anne Skalicky Mona L. Martin Heather Gelhorn |
spellingShingle |
William R. Lenderking Milena Anatchkova Robin Pokrzywinski Anne Skalicky Mona L. Martin Heather Gelhorn Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with rare disease Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes Rare disease HRQoL Clinical outcome assessment (COA) Item banks Measure adaptation FDA |
author_facet |
William R. Lenderking Milena Anatchkova Robin Pokrzywinski Anne Skalicky Mona L. Martin Heather Gelhorn |
author_sort |
William R. Lenderking |
title |
Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with rare disease |
title_short |
Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with rare disease |
title_full |
Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with rare disease |
title_fullStr |
Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with rare disease |
title_full_unstemmed |
Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with rare disease |
title_sort |
measuring health-related quality of life in patients with rare disease |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes |
issn |
2509-8020 |
publishDate |
2021-07-01 |
description |
Abstract Background There has been a growing emphasis on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as an important outcome in rare disease drug development, although its assessment may be useful outside the drug development context, including in clinical applications or natural history studies. Central to assessing quality of life in health research is utilizing outcome measures that capture symptoms and impacts of the disease and treatment that are important and relevant to patients. Identifying and implementing valid and reliable tools to measure HRQoL in rare diseases poses unique challenges that often require creative solutions. Main body In this commentary, we explore some of the challenges in HRQoL assessment in rare disease, propose solutions, and consider regulatory issues. Some of the solutions discussed entail the use of item banks, adapting existing measures from phenotypically similar disease contexts, use of multi-domain measurement indices, and adapting methods for assessing content validity of existing measures. Current regulatory considerations are discussed and resources outlined. Conclusion Quality of life may be the most important endpoint for patients with rare diseases, and the challenges of valid assessment require effort and innovative thinking specific to each context to improve measurement and clinical outcomes. |
topic |
Rare disease HRQoL Clinical outcome assessment (COA) Item banks Measure adaptation FDA |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-021-00336-8 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT williamrlenderking measuringhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithraredisease AT milenaanatchkova measuringhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithraredisease AT robinpokrzywinski measuringhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithraredisease AT anneskalicky measuringhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithraredisease AT monalmartin measuringhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithraredisease AT heathergelhorn measuringhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithraredisease |
_version_ |
1721283059413680128 |