Conflict Tasks of Different Types Divergently Affect the Attentional Processing of Gaze and Arrow

The present study explored the attentional processing mechanisms of gaze and arrow cues in two different types of conflict tasks. In Experiment 1, participants performed a flanker task in which gaze and arrow cues were presented as central targets or bilateral distractors. The congruency between the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lingxia Fan, Huan Yu, Xuemin Zhang, Qing Feng, Mengdan Sun, Mengsi Xu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2018-04-01
Series:i-Perception
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669518771713
id doaj-33cd6679692f4a8399fb67d176a894b6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-33cd6679692f4a8399fb67d176a894b62020-11-25T03:03:15ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952018-04-01910.1177/2041669518771713Conflict Tasks of Different Types Divergently Affect the Attentional Processing of Gaze and ArrowLingxia FanHuan YuXuemin ZhangQing FengMengdan SunMengsi XuThe present study explored the attentional processing mechanisms of gaze and arrow cues in two different types of conflict tasks. In Experiment 1, participants performed a flanker task in which gaze and arrow cues were presented as central targets or bilateral distractors. The congruency between the direction of the target and the distractors was manipulated. Results showed that arrow distractors greatly interfered with the attentional processing of gaze, while the processing of arrow direction was immune to conflict from gaze distractors. Using a spatial compatibility task, Experiment 2 explored the conflict effects exerted on gaze and arrow processing by their relative spatial locations. When the direction of the arrow was in conflict with its spatial layout on screen, response times were slowed; however, the encoding of gaze was unaffected by spatial location. In general, processing to an arrow cue is less influenced by bilateral gaze cues but is affected by irrelevant spatial information, while processing to a gaze cue is greatly disturbed by bilateral arrows but is unaffected by irrelevant spatial information. Different effects on gaze and arrow cues by different types of conflicts may reflect two relatively distinct specific modes of the attentional process.https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669518771713
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lingxia Fan
Huan Yu
Xuemin Zhang
Qing Feng
Mengdan Sun
Mengsi Xu
spellingShingle Lingxia Fan
Huan Yu
Xuemin Zhang
Qing Feng
Mengdan Sun
Mengsi Xu
Conflict Tasks of Different Types Divergently Affect the Attentional Processing of Gaze and Arrow
i-Perception
author_facet Lingxia Fan
Huan Yu
Xuemin Zhang
Qing Feng
Mengdan Sun
Mengsi Xu
author_sort Lingxia Fan
title Conflict Tasks of Different Types Divergently Affect the Attentional Processing of Gaze and Arrow
title_short Conflict Tasks of Different Types Divergently Affect the Attentional Processing of Gaze and Arrow
title_full Conflict Tasks of Different Types Divergently Affect the Attentional Processing of Gaze and Arrow
title_fullStr Conflict Tasks of Different Types Divergently Affect the Attentional Processing of Gaze and Arrow
title_full_unstemmed Conflict Tasks of Different Types Divergently Affect the Attentional Processing of Gaze and Arrow
title_sort conflict tasks of different types divergently affect the attentional processing of gaze and arrow
publisher SAGE Publishing
series i-Perception
issn 2041-6695
publishDate 2018-04-01
description The present study explored the attentional processing mechanisms of gaze and arrow cues in two different types of conflict tasks. In Experiment 1, participants performed a flanker task in which gaze and arrow cues were presented as central targets or bilateral distractors. The congruency between the direction of the target and the distractors was manipulated. Results showed that arrow distractors greatly interfered with the attentional processing of gaze, while the processing of arrow direction was immune to conflict from gaze distractors. Using a spatial compatibility task, Experiment 2 explored the conflict effects exerted on gaze and arrow processing by their relative spatial locations. When the direction of the arrow was in conflict with its spatial layout on screen, response times were slowed; however, the encoding of gaze was unaffected by spatial location. In general, processing to an arrow cue is less influenced by bilateral gaze cues but is affected by irrelevant spatial information, while processing to a gaze cue is greatly disturbed by bilateral arrows but is unaffected by irrelevant spatial information. Different effects on gaze and arrow cues by different types of conflicts may reflect two relatively distinct specific modes of the attentional process.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669518771713
work_keys_str_mv AT lingxiafan conflicttasksofdifferenttypesdivergentlyaffecttheattentionalprocessingofgazeandarrow
AT huanyu conflicttasksofdifferenttypesdivergentlyaffecttheattentionalprocessingofgazeandarrow
AT xueminzhang conflicttasksofdifferenttypesdivergentlyaffecttheattentionalprocessingofgazeandarrow
AT qingfeng conflicttasksofdifferenttypesdivergentlyaffecttheattentionalprocessingofgazeandarrow
AT mengdansun conflicttasksofdifferenttypesdivergentlyaffecttheattentionalprocessingofgazeandarrow
AT mengsixu conflicttasksofdifferenttypesdivergentlyaffecttheattentionalprocessingofgazeandarrow
_version_ 1724686777948569600