Moderating effects of corporate governance mechanism on the relation between capital structure and firm performance

The purpose of this study is to examine the moderating effect of corporate governance on the relationship between capital structure and firm performance. This study uses secondary data in the form of financial reports at the end of 2019 from micro-financial institutions (rural banks) with a total of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ngatno, Endang P. Apriatni, Arief Youlianto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2021-01-01
Series:Cogent Business & Management
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1866822
id doaj-33ba1e804d0f443cbef0dcf0f29b5a18
record_format Article
spelling doaj-33ba1e804d0f443cbef0dcf0f29b5a182021-01-15T14:43:44ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Business & Management2331-19752021-01-018110.1080/23311975.2020.18668221866822Moderating effects of corporate governance mechanism on the relation between capital structure and firm performanceNgatno0Endang P. Apriatni1Arief Youlianto2Diponegoro UniversitySemarang State UniversitySemarang State UniversityThe purpose of this study is to examine the moderating effect of corporate governance on the relationship between capital structure and firm performance. This study uses secondary data in the form of financial reports at the end of 2019 from micro-financial institutions (rural banks) with a total of 506 units. Data were analyzed using the Moderated Regression Analysis. Results indicate that capital structure financing decisions have a positive contribution to financial performance. However, this only applies to short-term debt. Otherwise, long-term debt has a negative and insignificant effect on both return on assets and return on equity. These results support the view of the pecking order theory, as empirical evidence that the opposite effect between firm profits and capital structure. The results of the moderation analysis show that only the size of the board of commissioners can strengthen the relationship between capital structure and company performance, while board size and ownership concentration are not able to moderate the relationship between capital structure and company performance.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1866822capital structureboard sizeboard of commissionersownership concentrationperformance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ngatno
Endang P. Apriatni
Arief Youlianto
spellingShingle Ngatno
Endang P. Apriatni
Arief Youlianto
Moderating effects of corporate governance mechanism on the relation between capital structure and firm performance
Cogent Business & Management
capital structure
board size
board of commissioners
ownership concentration
performance
author_facet Ngatno
Endang P. Apriatni
Arief Youlianto
author_sort Ngatno
title Moderating effects of corporate governance mechanism on the relation between capital structure and firm performance
title_short Moderating effects of corporate governance mechanism on the relation between capital structure and firm performance
title_full Moderating effects of corporate governance mechanism on the relation between capital structure and firm performance
title_fullStr Moderating effects of corporate governance mechanism on the relation between capital structure and firm performance
title_full_unstemmed Moderating effects of corporate governance mechanism on the relation between capital structure and firm performance
title_sort moderating effects of corporate governance mechanism on the relation between capital structure and firm performance
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Cogent Business & Management
issn 2331-1975
publishDate 2021-01-01
description The purpose of this study is to examine the moderating effect of corporate governance on the relationship between capital structure and firm performance. This study uses secondary data in the form of financial reports at the end of 2019 from micro-financial institutions (rural banks) with a total of 506 units. Data were analyzed using the Moderated Regression Analysis. Results indicate that capital structure financing decisions have a positive contribution to financial performance. However, this only applies to short-term debt. Otherwise, long-term debt has a negative and insignificant effect on both return on assets and return on equity. These results support the view of the pecking order theory, as empirical evidence that the opposite effect between firm profits and capital structure. The results of the moderation analysis show that only the size of the board of commissioners can strengthen the relationship between capital structure and company performance, while board size and ownership concentration are not able to moderate the relationship between capital structure and company performance.
topic capital structure
board size
board of commissioners
ownership concentration
performance
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1866822
work_keys_str_mv AT ngatno moderatingeffectsofcorporategovernancemechanismontherelationbetweencapitalstructureandfirmperformance
AT endangpapriatni moderatingeffectsofcorporategovernancemechanismontherelationbetweencapitalstructureandfirmperformance
AT ariefyoulianto moderatingeffectsofcorporategovernancemechanismontherelationbetweencapitalstructureandfirmperformance
_version_ 1724336692112916480