“Brutti, Sporchi & Cattivi”: Towards a Non-Abyssal Curriculum

The Western Cartesian Modernity model as an hegemonic model with its arrogant claim to address global social issues is not just moribund, it is dead. This article claims the twentieth century as ‘the last Eurocentric century’. Relying on the work of some key decolonial thinkers, such as Sousa Santos...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: João M. Paraskeva
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Universidade Federal de Sergipe 2016-04-01
Series:Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação
Online Access:https://seer.ufs.br/index.php/revtee/article/view/4966
id doaj-33b76d0911914eaba975371ee1966eec
record_format Article
spelling doaj-33b76d0911914eaba975371ee1966eec2020-11-25T02:22:52ZporUniversidade Federal de SergipeRevista Tempos e Espaços em Educação2358-14252016-04-01918759010.20952/revtee.v9i18.49663644“Brutti, Sporchi & Cattivi”: Towards a Non-Abyssal CurriculumJoão M. Paraskeva0Center for Portuguese Studies and Culture UMass Dartmouth, USAThe Western Cartesian Modernity model as an hegemonic model with its arrogant claim to address global social issues is not just moribund, it is dead. This article claims the twentieth century as ‘the last Eurocentric century’. Relying on the work of some key decolonial thinkers, such as Sousa Santos, the article denounces the way Western eugenic curriculum of modernity created an abyssal thinking in which ‘this side’ of the line is legitimate and ‘the other side’ has been produced as ‘non-existent’. In so doing curriculum as we knowing is part of the ‘epistemicide’. The article argues for an Itinerant Curriculum Theory that will help create new avenues to understand the field in the light of the classes within and beyond Eurocentrism, paying attention to other epistemologies beyond the Western framework. The article echoes Ettore Scola metaphor “Brutti, Sporchi Cattivi” to challenge how hegemonic and specific (or so called) counter hegemonic curriculum platforms – so connected with Western Eurocentric Modernity - have been able to colonize the field without any prudency to “fabricate” and impose a classed, raced and gendered philosophy of praxis, as unique, that drives the field to an ideological surrealism and collective suicide. The article challenges curriculum studies to assume a non-abyssal position one that respects epistemological diversity. This requires an Itinerant Curriculum Theory, which is a commitment with da ruthless epistemological critique of every existing epistemology.https://seer.ufs.br/index.php/revtee/article/view/4966
collection DOAJ
language Portuguese
format Article
sources DOAJ
author João M. Paraskeva
spellingShingle João M. Paraskeva
“Brutti, Sporchi & Cattivi”: Towards a Non-Abyssal Curriculum
Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação
author_facet João M. Paraskeva
author_sort João M. Paraskeva
title “Brutti, Sporchi & Cattivi”: Towards a Non-Abyssal Curriculum
title_short “Brutti, Sporchi & Cattivi”: Towards a Non-Abyssal Curriculum
title_full “Brutti, Sporchi & Cattivi”: Towards a Non-Abyssal Curriculum
title_fullStr “Brutti, Sporchi & Cattivi”: Towards a Non-Abyssal Curriculum
title_full_unstemmed “Brutti, Sporchi & Cattivi”: Towards a Non-Abyssal Curriculum
title_sort “brutti, sporchi & cattivi”: towards a non-abyssal curriculum
publisher Universidade Federal de Sergipe
series Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação
issn 2358-1425
publishDate 2016-04-01
description The Western Cartesian Modernity model as an hegemonic model with its arrogant claim to address global social issues is not just moribund, it is dead. This article claims the twentieth century as ‘the last Eurocentric century’. Relying on the work of some key decolonial thinkers, such as Sousa Santos, the article denounces the way Western eugenic curriculum of modernity created an abyssal thinking in which ‘this side’ of the line is legitimate and ‘the other side’ has been produced as ‘non-existent’. In so doing curriculum as we knowing is part of the ‘epistemicide’. The article argues for an Itinerant Curriculum Theory that will help create new avenues to understand the field in the light of the classes within and beyond Eurocentrism, paying attention to other epistemologies beyond the Western framework. The article echoes Ettore Scola metaphor “Brutti, Sporchi Cattivi” to challenge how hegemonic and specific (or so called) counter hegemonic curriculum platforms – so connected with Western Eurocentric Modernity - have been able to colonize the field without any prudency to “fabricate” and impose a classed, raced and gendered philosophy of praxis, as unique, that drives the field to an ideological surrealism and collective suicide. The article challenges curriculum studies to assume a non-abyssal position one that respects epistemological diversity. This requires an Itinerant Curriculum Theory, which is a commitment with da ruthless epistemological critique of every existing epistemology.
url https://seer.ufs.br/index.php/revtee/article/view/4966
work_keys_str_mv AT joaomparaskeva bruttisporchicattivitowardsanonabyssalcurriculum
_version_ 1724861441793589248